linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Satchell <satch@fluent-access.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	Jason McMullan <jmcmullan@linuxcare.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What are the VM motivations??
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:33:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20010624133249.00b95d10@mail.fluent-access.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106241525430.7419-100000@imladris.rielhome. conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <20010624140114.A10745@jmcmullan.resilience.com>

At 03:26 PM 6/24/01 -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Jason McMullan wrote:
>
> >       Uhh. That's not what I was ranting about. What I was
> > ranting about is that we have never 'put to paper' the
> > requirements ('motiviations') for a good VM, nor have we
> > looked at said nonexistent list and figured out what instrumentation
> > would be needed.
>
>But we have.  The fact that you missed the event doesn't
>make it any less true.

URL, please?

If the requirements/motivations were "put on paper" getting them on the Web 
is not a big deal.  If it's *only* on paper, I can give you my fax number 
and I'll be happy to put it up on the Web.

Satch


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-06-24 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <9h6916$4og$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-06-21 23:01 ` What are the VM motivations?? Jason McMullan
2001-06-21 23:32   ` [OT] " Justin Guyett
2001-06-22  1:13     ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-22  0:23   ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-23 20:23     ` watermodem
2001-07-01 23:58       ` Mark H. Wood
2001-06-23  2:03   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-06-24 15:04   ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 18:01     ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 18:26       ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 18:52         ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 19:29           ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 20:29             ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 20:49               ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 20:39             ` Jonathan Morton
2001-06-24 20:33       ` Stephen Satchell [this message]
2001-06-25  1:46       ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-25  2:53         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-25  3:44           ` Colonel
2001-06-25  4:04             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-25 15:46               ` Colonel
2001-06-25 16:25                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-25 17:53                 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-25 17:48             ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 16:15   ` Colonel
2001-06-24 16:34     ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 19:11       ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-25  3:40     ` Colonel
2001-07-01 14:43   ` Mark H. Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4.3.2.7.2.20010624133249.00b95d10@mail.fluent-access.com \
    --to=satch@fluent-access.com \
    --cc=jmcmullan@linuxcare.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).