From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: klink@clouddancer.com (Colonel), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What are the VM motivations??
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:25:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01062518253003.01008@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010621190103.A888@jmcmullan.resilience.com> <9h6d6b$509$1@ns1.clouddancer.com> <20010625154649.820E4784D9@mail.clouddancer.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010625154649.820E4784D9@mail.clouddancer.com>
On Monday 25 June 2001 17:46, Colonel wrote:
> >> POST IT. Give the rest of us some clues and the opportunity to check
> >> evaluator's replies.
> >
> >Well, if you try that strategy you'll find you never get around to posting
> > it because you'll be too worried about getting it right. The point is
> > not to get it right, it's to get a starting point down on (virtual)
> > paper. I'd strongly suggest passing something like that around for
> > comment privately first.
>
> Well, it does seem that some ego is involved here...
Not in this case. Do it whichever way you want, the point is: do it (don't
just talk about it)
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-25 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <9h6916$4og$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-06-21 23:01 ` What are the VM motivations?? Jason McMullan
2001-06-21 23:32 ` [OT] " Justin Guyett
2001-06-22 1:13 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-22 0:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-23 20:23 ` watermodem
2001-07-01 23:58 ` Mark H. Wood
2001-06-23 2:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-06-24 15:04 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 18:01 ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 18:26 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 18:52 ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 19:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 20:29 ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 20:49 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 20:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-06-24 20:33 ` Stephen Satchell
2001-06-25 1:46 ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-25 2:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-25 3:44 ` Colonel
2001-06-25 4:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-25 15:46 ` Colonel
2001-06-25 16:25 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-06-25 17:53 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-25 17:48 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 16:15 ` Colonel
2001-06-24 16:34 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 19:11 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-25 3:40 ` Colonel
2001-07-01 14:43 ` Mark H. Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01062518253003.01008@starship \
--to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=klink@clouddancer.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).