From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com>
Cc: Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
jwerner@chromium.org, kishon@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
Tao Huang <huangtao@rock-chips.com>,
william.wu@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: add a new driver for Rockchip usb2phy
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:00:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4065185.1IWsBDlcMJ@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABXOdTfzDeg3KOmEkJkeUWs76wFind89D-bSrs=7-jSxmdhSHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2016, 06:50:31 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016, 10:10:10 schrieb Frank Wang:
> >> The newer SoCs (rk3366, rk3399) take a different usb-phy IP block
> >> than rk3288 and before, and most of phy-related registers are also
> >> different from the past, so a new phy driver is required necessarily.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>
> >> ---
[...]
> >> +static int rockchip_usb2phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> >> +{
> >> + struct rockchip_usb2phy_port *rport = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> >> + struct rockchip_usb2phy *rphy = dev_get_drvdata(phy->dev.parent);
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >>
> > if (!rport->port_cfg)
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > Otherwise the currently empty otg-port will cause null-pointer
> > dereferences
> > when it gets assigned in the devicetree already.
>
> Not really, at least not here - that port should not have port_id set
> to USB2PHY_PORT_HOST.
>
> Does it even make sense to instantiate the otg port ? Is it going to
> do anything without port configuration ?
Ok, that would be the other option - not creating the phy in the driver.
Or from what I've seen, handling it as similar to the host-port should work
initially as well most likely, supplying the additional otg-parts later on.
[...]
> >> +static int rockchip_usb2phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
> >> +{
> >> + struct rockchip_usb2phy_port *rport = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> >> +
> >>
> > if (!rport->port_cfg)
> >
> > return 0;
>
> No access to port_cfg here ?
sorry, one copy'n'paste to many :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-13 2:10 [PATCH v5 0/2] Add a new Rockchip usb2 phy driver Frank Wang
2016-06-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] Documentation: bindings: add DT documentation for Rockchip USB2PHY Frank Wang
2016-06-13 8:38 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-14 13:28 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-15 1:24 ` Frank Wang
2016-06-14 22:26 ` Rob Herring
2016-06-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: add a new driver for Rockchip usb2phy Frank Wang
2016-06-14 13:27 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-14 13:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-14 14:00 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2016-06-15 1:14 ` Frank Wang
2016-06-15 15:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-16 1:47 ` Frank Wang
2016-06-16 13:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-17 0:57 ` Frank Wang
2016-06-15 3:23 ` Frank Wang
2016-06-15 9:04 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-15 10:58 ` Frank Wang
2016-06-15 18:49 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-14 14:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-14 15:20 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-17 11:54 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-06-17 16:46 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-29 14:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-06-29 14:27 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4065185.1IWsBDlcMJ@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=frank.wang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=groeck@google.com \
--cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=william.wu@rock-chips.com \
--cc=xzy.xu@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).