linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>,
	heiko@sntech.de, dianders@chromium.org, groeck@chromium.org,
	jwerner@chromium.org, kishon@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	xzy.xu@rock-chips.com, kever.yang@rock-chips.com,
	huangtao@rock-chips.com, william.wu@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: add a new driver for Rockchip usb2phy
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:52:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57601A1D.9020803@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465783810-18756-3-git-send-email-frank.wang@rock-chips.com>

On 06/12/2016 07:10 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
> The newer SoCs (rk3366, rk3399) take a different usb-phy IP block
> than rk3288 and before, and most of phy-related registers are also
> different from the past, so a new phy driver is required necessarily.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>

[ ... ]

> +
> +static int rockchip_usb2phy_resume(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_usb2phy_port *rport = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +	struct rockchip_usb2phy *rphy = dev_get_drvdata(phy->dev.parent);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(&rport->phy->dev, "port resume\n");
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rphy->clk480m);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = property_enable(rphy, &rport->port_cfg->phy_sus, false);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	rport->suspended = false;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_usb2phy_suspend(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_usb2phy_port *rport = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +	struct rockchip_usb2phy *rphy = dev_get_drvdata(phy->dev.parent);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(&rport->phy->dev, "port suspend\n");
> +
> +	ret = property_enable(rphy, &rport->port_cfg->phy_sus, true);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	rport->suspended = true;
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(rphy->clk480m);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

I am still quite confused by the clock handling.

The above will be called for each instantiated phy (user, otg).
Each time, clk_disable_unprepare() will be called. Yet, there
is no matching clk_prepare_enable() call during initialization.

How does this work ?

Thanks,
Guenter

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-14 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-13  2:10 [PATCH v5 0/2] Add a new Rockchip usb2 phy driver Frank Wang
2016-06-13  2:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] Documentation: bindings: add DT documentation for Rockchip USB2PHY Frank Wang
2016-06-13  8:38   ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-14 13:28     ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-15  1:24       ` Frank Wang
2016-06-14 22:26   ` Rob Herring
2016-06-13  2:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: add a new driver for Rockchip usb2phy Frank Wang
2016-06-14 13:27   ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-14 13:50     ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-14 14:00       ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-15  1:14         ` Frank Wang
2016-06-15 15:47           ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-16  1:47             ` Frank Wang
2016-06-16 13:12               ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-17  0:57                 ` Frank Wang
2016-06-15  3:23     ` Frank Wang
2016-06-15  9:04       ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-15 10:58         ` Frank Wang
2016-06-15 18:49           ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-14 14:52   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-06-14 15:20     ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-17 11:54   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-06-17 16:46     ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-29 14:14       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-06-29 14:27         ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57601A1D.9020803@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=frank.wang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=groeck@chromium.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
    --cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=william.wu@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=xzy.xu@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).