* Rate of change
@ 2004-10-19 21:16 Jeff Garzik
2004-10-19 21:31 ` Ben Dooks
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-10-19 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel
850 changesets and 3383 revisions since 2.6.9 was released,
a little over 24 hours ago.
That's pretty impressive.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Rate of change
2004-10-19 21:16 Rate of change Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-10-19 21:31 ` Ben Dooks
2004-10-19 21:37 ` Dave Jones
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2004-10-19 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Linux Kernel
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:16:00PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> 850 changesets and 3383 revisions since 2.6.9 was released,
> a little over 24 hours ago.
>
> That's pretty impressive.
well, i've had stuff waiting for a few days for this
release to happen, so some of us where prepared ;-)
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Rate of change
2004-10-19 21:16 Rate of change Jeff Garzik
2004-10-19 21:31 ` Ben Dooks
@ 2004-10-19 21:37 ` Dave Jones
2004-10-19 21:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-19 21:39 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-19 21:45 ` Matt Heler
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2004-10-19 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Linux Kernel
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:16:00PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> 850 changesets and 3383 revisions since 2.6.9 was released,
> a little over 24 hours ago.
>
> That's pretty impressive.
Given a lot of these are backlogs from folks being
conservative whilst we were in -rc, perhaps this is an
indication we need shorter -rc periods ?
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Rate of change
2004-10-19 21:37 ` Dave Jones
@ 2004-10-19 21:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-20 14:34 ` Russell King
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-10-19 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Jones, Linux Kernel
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:37:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:16:00PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > 850 changesets and 3383 revisions since 2.6.9 was released,
> > a little over 24 hours ago.
> >
> > That's pretty impressive.
>
> Given a lot of these are backlogs from folks being
> conservative whilst we were in -rc, perhaps this is an
> indication we need shorter -rc periods ?
Actually, we need longer non-rc periods :)
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Rate of change
2004-10-19 21:16 Rate of change Jeff Garzik
2004-10-19 21:31 ` Ben Dooks
2004-10-19 21:37 ` Dave Jones
@ 2004-10-19 21:39 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-19 21:45 ` Matt Heler
3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Måns Rullgård @ 2004-10-19 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> writes:
> 850 changesets and 3383 revisions since 2.6.9 was released,
> a little over 24 hours ago.
>
> That's pretty impressive.
It is, but I'm sure many of those changes were patches pending the
release before being committed.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@mru.ath.cx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Rate of change
2004-10-19 21:16 Rate of change Jeff Garzik
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-19 21:39 ` Måns Rullgård
@ 2004-10-19 21:45 ` Matt Heler
2004-10-19 22:04 ` Jeff Garzik
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Matt Heler @ 2004-10-19 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Linux Kernel
How many changes occured between 2.6.8 & 2.6.9 ?
-matt
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 2:16 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 850 changesets and 3383 revisions since 2.6.9 was released,
> a little over 24 hours ago.
>
> That's pretty impressive.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Rate of change
2004-10-19 21:45 ` Matt Heler
@ 2004-10-19 22:04 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-10-19 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lkml; +Cc: Linux Kernel
Matt Heler wrote:
> How many changes occured between 2.6.8 & 2.6.9 ?
'bk pull' says 4000 revisions to ChangeSet, for
15723 total revisions.
(these numbers include merge changesets, which inflate things)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Rate of change
2004-10-19 21:39 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-10-20 14:34 ` Russell King
2004-10-21 20:30 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-22 10:28 ` Pavel Machek
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2004-10-20 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Dave Jones, Linux Kernel
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:39:32PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:37:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:16:00PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > 850 changesets and 3383 revisions since 2.6.9 was released,
> > > a little over 24 hours ago.
> > >
> > > That's pretty impressive.
> >
> > Given a lot of these are backlogs from folks being
> > conservative whilst we were in -rc, perhaps this is an
> > indication we need shorter -rc periods ?
>
>
> Actually, we need longer non-rc periods :)
Personally, I think both of you are right. One major kernel release a
month seemed to be about the right rate. Maybe a week and a half of
non-rc plus two and a half weeks of -rc would be the right kind of
balance?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Rate of change
2004-10-19 21:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-20 14:34 ` Russell King
@ 2004-10-21 20:30 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-22 10:28 ` Pavel Machek
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2004-10-21 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Dave Jones, Linux Kernel
On Tue, Oct 19 2004, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:37:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:16:00PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > 850 changesets and 3383 revisions since 2.6.9 was released,
> > > a little over 24 hours ago.
> > >
> > > That's pretty impressive.
> >
> > Given a lot of these are backlogs from folks being
> > conservative whilst we were in -rc, perhaps this is an
> > indication we need shorter -rc periods ?
>
>
> Actually, we need longer non-rc periods :)
Agree. The rate of change is truly impressive (thank you Andrew and
BK!), but personally I'd like to see things settle down a lot more
quickly. Instead of having 2-3 weeks of continual patch flood, a week or
submitting the stuff that was already done by 2.6.9 by Andrews inclusion
criteria (which I completely agree with) results in -rc1, followed by
2-3 weeks of of truly stabilizing bug fixing. Since by virtue of this
inclusion criteria development for a particular feature/change is
already done by 2.6.9 release, this should be easy [1].
[1] Yeah right, but at least we can try.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Rate of change
2004-10-19 21:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-20 14:34 ` Russell King
2004-10-21 20:30 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2004-10-22 10:28 ` Pavel Machek
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2004-10-22 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Dave Jones, Linux Kernel
Hi!
> > > 850 changesets and 3383 revisions since 2.6.9 was released,
> > > a little over 24 hours ago.
> > >
> > > That's pretty impressive.
> >
> > Given a lot of these are backlogs from folks being
> > conservative whilst we were in -rc, perhaps this is an
> > indication we need shorter -rc periods ?
>
>
> Actually, we need longer non-rc periods :)
Or perhaps we need 2.7? It would probably make sense to keep 2.7
shorter than usual...
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-22 11:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-19 21:16 Rate of change Jeff Garzik
2004-10-19 21:31 ` Ben Dooks
2004-10-19 21:37 ` Dave Jones
2004-10-19 21:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-20 14:34 ` Russell King
2004-10-21 20:30 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-22 10:28 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-19 21:39 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-19 21:45 ` Matt Heler
2004-10-19 22:04 ` Jeff Garzik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).