From: Alexander Fieroch <Fieroch@web.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Subject: Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 22:18:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <429A2397.6090609@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050527171613.5f949683.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Does the thing work correctly under any versions of Linux? If so, which?
Ok, I have gathered much informations as possible that could help you.
I've tested different versions of linux as follows. None works fine but
all have different error messages:
With kernel 2.6.8.1 and kernel 2.6.9 I get continually apic error
messages that makes the kernel unusable for me:
May 28 13:12:53 orclex kernel: APIC error on CPU0: 60(60)
May 28 13:13:05 orclex last message repeated 44 times
This is repeating every few seconds.
Kernel 2.6.10
-------------
I did not recognize the error message above with apic error but I get
every 2 seconds the following message on my terminal which makes the
kernel unusable for me too.
Call Trace:<IRQ> <ffffffff801505fc>{__report_bad_irq+48}
<ffffffff801506c0>{note_interr
upt+91}
<ffffffff80150080>{__do_IRQ+257} <ffffffff8010ffb8>{do_IRQ+58}
<ffffffff8010d7c9>{ret_from_intr+0} <EOI>
<ffffffff8010b573>{mwait_idle+94}
<ffffffff8010b4ca>{cpu_idle+45} <ffffffff80645882>{start_kernel+415}
<ffffffff80645259>{x86_64_start_kernel+365}
handlers:
[<ffffffff802f33b2>] (ide_intr+0x0/0x17e)
[<ffffffff8033f5e9>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x68)
Disabling IRQ #185
irq 185: nobody cared!
Kernel 2.6.11.11
----------------
Kernel 2.6.11.xx is the first kernel where the message "drive appears
confused" is thrown.
I also recognize the following lines in syslog where the kernel hangs
for some seconds (nearly a minute) while booting:
May 28 13:47:10 orclex kernel: ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:01:0a.0[A] ->
GSI 21 (level, lo
w) -> IRQ 21
May 28 13:47:10 orclex kernel: hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x64
May 28 13:47:10 orclex kernel: hda: DMA interrupt recovery
May 28 13:47:10 orclex kernel: hda: lost interrupt
I have enabled "ACPI APIC" in my bios. Disabling this causes the kernel
to hang on the last message above and repeating "hda: lost interrupt"
continually.
The "nobody cared" message is still here.
...
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
irq 18: nobody cared!
Call Trace:<IRQ> <ffffffff80150064>{__report_bad_irq+48}
<ffffffff80150128>{note_interrupt+91}
<ffffffff8014fae3>{__do_IRQ+257} <ffffffff80110105>{do_IRQ+71}
<ffffffff8010d83d>{ret_from_intr+0} <EOI>
<ffffffff8015e0a1>{clear_page_range+845}
<ffffffff8015e10a>{clear_page_range+950}
<ffffffff801641bb>{exit_mmap+222}
<ffffffff8012faa8>{mmput+50} <ffffffff80134adc>{do_exit+306}
<ffffffff80134e78>{sys_exit_group+0}
<ffffffff8010d296>{system_call+126}
handlers:
[<ffffffff803021af>] (ide_intr+0x0/0x17a)
[<ffffffff8034e53a>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x68)
Disabling IRQ #18
hdb: lost interrupt
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)
...
After booting this is repeating continually and I get every minute a
message on the console:
Message from syslogd@orclex at Sat May 28 13:33:02 2005 ...
orclex kernel: Disabling IRQ #18
syslog contains following message every minute:
May 28 13:33:01 orclex kernel: hdb: lost interrupt
May 28 13:33:01 orclex kernel: hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears
confused (ireason
= 0x01)
May 28 13:33:01 orclex last message repeated 18 times
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel: irq 18: nobody cared!
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel:
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel: Call Trace:<IRQ>
<ffffffff80150064>{__report_bad_irq+48}
<ffffffff80150128>{note_interrupt+91}
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel: <ffffffff8014fae3>{__do_IRQ+257}
<ffffffff8011010
5>{do_IRQ+71}
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel:
<ffffffff8010d83d>{ret_from_intr+0} <EOI> <fffff
fff8010b588>{mwait_idle+94}
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel: <ffffffff8010b50c>{cpu_idle+57}
<ffffffff8065686d
>{start_kernel+425}
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel:
<ffffffff80656258>{x86_64_start_kernel+364}
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel: handlers:
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel: [<ffffffff803021af>] (ide_intr+0x0/0x17a)
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel: [<ffffffff8034e53a>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x68)
May 28 13:33:02 orclex kernel: Disabling IRQ #18
May 28 13:34:03 orclex kernel: hdb: lost interrupt
May 28 13:34:03 orclex kernel: hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears
confused (ireason
= 0x01)
May 28 13:34:03 orclex last message repeated 21 times
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel: irq 18: nobody cared!
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel:
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel: Call Trace:<IRQ>
<ffffffff80150064>{__report_bad_irq+48}
<ffffffff80150128>{note_interrupt+91}
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel: <ffffffff8014fae3>{__do_IRQ+257}
<ffffffff8011010
5>{do_IRQ+71}
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel:
<ffffffff8010d83d>{ret_from_intr+0} <EOI> <fffff
fff8010b588>{mwait_idle+94}
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel: <ffffffff8010b50c>{cpu_idle+57}
<ffffffff8065686d
>{start_kernel+425}
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel:
<ffffffff80656258>{x86_64_start_kernel+364}
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel: handlers:
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel: [<ffffffff803021af>] (ide_intr+0x0/0x17a)
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel: [<ffffffff8034e53a>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x68)
May 28 13:34:04 orclex kernel: Disabling IRQ #18
Kernel 2.6.12rc5
----------------
Some more informations like "packet command error: status=0xd0" but
still the same errors like kernel 2.6.11.xx.
May 28 14:04:04 orclex kernel: hda: lost interrupt
May 28 14:04:04 orclex kernel: hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears
confused (ireason
= 0x01)
May 28 14:04:04 orclex last message repeated 38 times
May 28 14:04:04 orclex kernel: hdb: packet command error: status=0xd0 {
Busy }
May 28 14:04:04 orclex kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
May 28 14:04:04 orclex kernel: hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears
confused (ireason
= 0x01)
May 28 14:04:04 orclex last message repeated 17 times
May 28 14:04:04 orclex kernel: scsi: unknown opcode 0x85
May 28 14:04:05 orclex lpd[4400]: restarted
May 28 14:04:05 orclex hddtemp[4391]: /dev/hda: IC35L060AVV207-0: 38 C
May 28 14:04:05 orclex kernel: irq 217: nobody cared!
May 28 14:04:05 orclex kernel:
May 28 14:04:05 orclex kernel: Call Trace: <IRQ>
<ffffffff80154078>{__report_bad_irq+48
} <ffffffff8015413c>{note_interrupt+91}
May 28 14:04:05 orclex kernel: <ffffffff80153af7>{__do_IRQ+257}
<ffffffff8011049
d>{do_IRQ+67}
May 28 14:04:05 orclex kernel:
<ffffffff8010dded>{ret_from_intr+0} <EOI>
May 28 14:04:05 orclex kernel: handlers:
May 28 14:04:05 orclex kernel: [<ffffffff8030a879>] (ide_intr+0x0/0x17a)
May 28 14:04:05 orclex kernel: [<ffffffff80357a5d>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x68)
May 28 14:04:05 orclex kernel: Disabling IRQ #217
> If the answer to my first queston is "no" then perhaps the hardware is
> busted. Try swapping out cables, check power supplies, try a different
> drive, etc.
To test the hardware if it is busted I've have installed an ugly redmont
os and I could not recognize any problems. I also have burned a cdrom
with my burner that is hdb on linux and makes the problems. So I think
the hardware can't be busted and there has to be a problem with the
module for the Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) IDE
Controller?
> If none of that helps then perhaps there's something we can do in
> cdrom_pc_intr() to work around this?
That would be very great. I would like to give you any more information
that is needed.
Thanks and regards,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-29 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-18 22:24 [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!" Alexander Fieroch
2005-05-27 19:30 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-05-28 0:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-29 20:18 ` Alexander Fieroch [this message]
2005-06-14 8:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-06-15 20:39 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-06-15 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16 22:23 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-16 23:52 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-06-17 10:49 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-06-17 12:38 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-17 17:05 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-06-17 17:17 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-06-29 13:47 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-07-06 10:17 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-07-29 22:38 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-07-30 0:57 ` Michael Thonke
2005-07-29 23:05 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-07-30 1:42 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2005-08-01 14:38 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-08-01 14:56 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-08-01 19:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-01 19:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-09 17:28 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-08-09 22:14 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-19 11:12 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-07-31 22:15 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-07-06 10:19 ` Alexander Fieroch
[not found] ` <42C0953B.8000506@web.de>
2005-06-28 13:47 ` [2.6.12rc4] " Alan Cox
2005-08-04 20:25 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-05 10:19 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-17 11:29 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-06-13 17:59 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-06-17 17:32 Protasevich, Natalie
2005-06-20 8:08 ` Alexander Fieroch
2005-06-17 17:38 Protasevich, Natalie
2005-06-17 18:41 Protasevich, Natalie
[not found] <19D0D50E9B1D0A40A9F0323DBFA04ACCE04C08@USRV-EXCH4.na.uis.unisys.com>
2005-06-21 18:22 ` Alexander Fieroch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=429A2397.6090609@web.de \
--to=fieroch@web.de \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).