linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/8] PCI: make PCI device create/destroy logic symmetric
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:35:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4306778.V6LZtQIM99@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358525267-14268-2-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>

On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:07:39 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> According to device model documentation, the way to create/destroy PCI
> devices should be symmetric.
> 
> /**
>  * device_del - delete device from system.
>  * @dev: device.
>  *
>  * This is the first part of the device unregistration
>  * sequence. This removes the device from the lists we control
>  * from here, has it removed from the other driver model
>  * subsystems it was added to in device_add(), and removes it
>  * from the kobject hierarchy.
>  *
>  * NOTE: this should be called manually _iff_ device_add() was
>  * also called manually.
>  */
> 
> The rule is to either use
> 1) device_register()/device_unregister()
> or
> 2) device_initialize()/device_add()/device_del()/put_device().
> 
> So change PCI core logic to follow the rule and get rid of the redundant
> pci_dev_get()/pci_dev_put() pair.

This seems to be the same as https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2000051/

Can you please avoid sending duplicates?

Rafael


> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/probe.c  |    1 -
>  drivers/pci/remove.c |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 4f7f963..ec5d28f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1294,7 +1294,6 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
>  {
>  	device_initialize(&dev->dev);
>  	dev->dev.release = pci_release_dev;
> -	pci_dev_get(dev);
>  
>  	dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dma_mask;
>  	dev->dev.dma_parms = &dev->dma_parms;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c
> index 513972f..10693f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/remove.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static void pci_stop_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (dev->is_added) {
>  		pci_proc_detach_device(dev);
>  		pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files(dev);
> -		device_unregister(&dev->dev);
> +		device_del(&dev->dev);
>  		dev->is_added = 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static void pci_destroy_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
>  
>  	pci_free_resources(dev);
> -	pci_dev_put(dev);
> +	put_device(&dev->dev);
>  }
>  
>  void pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-20 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-18 16:07 [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] introduce PCI bus notifier chain to get rid of the ACPI PCI subdriver interfaces Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/8] PCI: make PCI device create/destroy logic symmetric Jiang Liu
2013-01-20 23:35   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/8] PCI: split registration of PCI bus devices into two stages Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/8] PCI: add a blocking notifier chain for PCI bus addition/removal Jiang Liu
2013-01-20 23:54   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-21 16:18     ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-21 22:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 4/8] ACPI, PCI: avoid building pci_slot as module Jiang Liu
2013-01-21  0:01   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-28 21:09     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-28 21:29       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-28 21:52         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-28 22:00           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-28 22:14             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-28 22:58               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29  2:07                 ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-29  2:21                   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29  2:45                     ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-29  2:50                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29  4:36                   ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-29  4:36               ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-29  1:00       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 20:18       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 20:58         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-03 22:47       ` Myron Stowe
2013-02-03 23:38         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 5/8] PCI, ACPI: hook PCI bus notifications to create/destroy PCI slots Jiang Liu
2013-01-21  0:05   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 6/8] pci_slot: replace printk(KERN_xxx) with pr_xxx() Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 7/8] PCI/PCIe: add "pci=nopciehp" to disable PCIe native hotplug Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 17:35   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-18 17:50     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-18 22:08       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 16:19         ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 22:01     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-19  1:56     ` Yijing Wang
2013-01-19 14:51       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 8/8] PCI/PCIe: only claim PME from firmware when CONFIG_PCIE_PME is enabled Jiang Liu
2013-01-20 23:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-21 17:06     ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-28 20:56 ` [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] introduce PCI bus notifier chain to get rid of the ACPI PCI subdriver interfaces Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29  0:34   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29  2:04     ` Jiang Liu
2013-02-01 16:13       ` Jiang Liu
2013-02-01 22:52         ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4306778.V6LZtQIM99@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).