linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 8/8] PCI/PCIe: only claim PME from firmware when CONFIG_PCIE_PME is enabled
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:06:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FD75AE.7000109@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2580359.lck5YacT35@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 01/21/2013 07:43 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:07:46 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
>> If CONFIG_PCIE_PME is not defined, system should avoid claiming PME from
>> firmware so firmware could still manage PME events for those devices.
>> Also don't create PCIe port device for PME service if CONFIG_PCIE_PME
>> is not defined.
> 
> No, this isn't correct.
> 
> We know from experience that it is in fact necessary to request control of
> either all PCIe native features or none of them.  Anything else leads to
> very "interesting" failure modes on some systems.
> 
> I think we should just remove CONFIG_PCIE_PME instead.
Hi Rafael,
	Thanks for reminder, don't know these tricky things about BIOS:)
Seems we can't easily remove CONFIG_PCIE_PME currently, so I will just
drop this patch.
Regards!
Gerry

> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c         |    5 +++--
>>  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c |    4 +++-
>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> index c37eedb..7f7e464 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> @@ -550,8 +550,9 @@ static int __devinit acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>>  
>>  	if (!pcie_ports_disabled
>>  	    && (flags & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) == ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
>> -		flags = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL
>> -			| OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
>> +		flags = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL;
>> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_PME))
>> +			flags |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
>>  		if (!pcie_native_hotplug_disabled)
>>  			flags |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> index e7e1679..7e6546f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> @@ -263,7 +263,9 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  
>>  	err = pcie_port_platform_notify(dev, &cap_mask);
>>  	if (!pcie_ports_auto) {
>> -		cap_mask = PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME | PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_VC;
>> +		cap_mask = PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_VC;
>> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_PME))
>> +			cap_mask |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME;
>>  		if (!pcie_native_hotplug_disabled)
>>  			cap_mask |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP;
>>  		if (pci_aer_available())
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-21 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-18 16:07 [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] introduce PCI bus notifier chain to get rid of the ACPI PCI subdriver interfaces Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/8] PCI: make PCI device create/destroy logic symmetric Jiang Liu
2013-01-20 23:35   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/8] PCI: split registration of PCI bus devices into two stages Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/8] PCI: add a blocking notifier chain for PCI bus addition/removal Jiang Liu
2013-01-20 23:54   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-21 16:18     ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-21 22:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 4/8] ACPI, PCI: avoid building pci_slot as module Jiang Liu
2013-01-21  0:01   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-28 21:09     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-28 21:29       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-28 21:52         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-28 22:00           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-28 22:14             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-28 22:58               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29  2:07                 ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-29  2:21                   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29  2:45                     ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-29  2:50                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29  4:36                   ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-29  4:36               ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-29  1:00       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 20:18       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 20:58         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-03 22:47       ` Myron Stowe
2013-02-03 23:38         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 5/8] PCI, ACPI: hook PCI bus notifications to create/destroy PCI slots Jiang Liu
2013-01-21  0:05   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 6/8] pci_slot: replace printk(KERN_xxx) with pr_xxx() Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 7/8] PCI/PCIe: add "pci=nopciehp" to disable PCIe native hotplug Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 17:35   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-18 17:50     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-18 22:08       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 16:19         ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 22:01     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-19  1:56     ` Yijing Wang
2013-01-19 14:51       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 8/8] PCI/PCIe: only claim PME from firmware when CONFIG_PCIE_PME is enabled Jiang Liu
2013-01-20 23:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-21 17:06     ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2013-01-28 20:56 ` [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] introduce PCI bus notifier chain to get rid of the ACPI PCI subdriver interfaces Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29  0:34   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29  2:04     ` Jiang Liu
2013-02-01 16:13       ` Jiang Liu
2013-02-01 22:52         ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50FD75AE.7000109@gmail.com \
    --to=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).