From: Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: dmitry pervushin <dpervushin@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] Re: SPI
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:46:52 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <433825FC.7050603@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509261625.j8QGPQ9K007078@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
My POV is that those lines should go away.
Best regards,
Vitaly
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:12:14 +0400, dmitry pervushin said:
>
>
>>Hello guys,
>>
>>I am attaching the next incarnation of SPI core; feel free to comment it.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>+/* The devfs code is contributed by Philipp Matthias Hahn
>>+ <pmhahn@titan.lahn.de> */
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>+/* devfs code corrected to support automatic device addition/deletion
>>+ by Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com> (C) 2004 MontaVista Software, Inc.
>>+ */
>>
>>
>
>I'd like to thank Vitaly and Philipp for their work, which was probably useful
>at the time, but I've always wondered - when cleaning up code, should such comments
>be removed too, or left as historical reminders? The MAINTAINERS file seems
>to get cleaned most of the time, the CREDITS doesn't - which way should
>in-source comments go?
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-26 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-26 11:12 SPI dmitry pervushin
2005-09-26 12:31 ` SPI Eric Piel
2005-09-26 12:37 ` [spi-devel-general] SPI dmitry pervushin
2005-09-26 16:20 ` SPI Grant Likely
2005-09-27 7:39 ` [spi-devel-general] SPI dmitry pervushin
2005-09-26 16:25 ` SPI Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-26 16:46 ` Vitaly Wool [this message]
2005-09-26 20:25 ` SPI Jesper Juhl
2005-09-27 12:43 ` SPI Greg KH
2005-09-27 14:27 ` [spi-devel-general] SPI dmitry pervushin
2005-09-27 14:35 ` Greg KH
2005-09-27 14:49 ` dmitry pervushin
2005-09-27 14:54 ` Greg KH
2005-09-27 15:19 ` dmitry pervushin
2005-09-28 13:14 ` [PATCH] SPI dmitry pervushin
2005-11-21 20:15 SPI Mark Underwood
2005-11-21 21:27 ` SPI David Brownell
2005-11-22 6:00 ` [spi-devel-general] SPI Vitaly Wool
2005-11-22 19:11 ` Mark Underwood
[not found] ` <200511221233.16634.david-b@pacbell.net>
2005-11-23 9:33 ` Vitaly Wool
2005-11-23 19:05 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=433825FC.7050603@ru.mvista.com \
--to=vwool@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=dpervushin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).