From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] mm, oom: remove oom_lock from exit_mmap
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 06:18:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44d26c25-6e09-49de-5e90-3c16115eb337@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180713142612.GD19960@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 2018/07/13 23:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 12-07-18 14:34:00, David Rientjes wrote:
> [...]
>> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
>> index 0fe4087d5151..e6328cef090f 100644
>> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
>> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
>> @@ -488,9 +488,11 @@ void __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
>> * Tell all users of get_user/copy_from_user etc... that the content
>> * is no longer stable. No barriers really needed because unmapping
>> * should imply barriers already and the reader would hit a page fault
>> - * if it stumbled over a reaped memory.
>> + * if it stumbled over a reaped memory. If MMF_UNSTABLE is already set,
>> + * reaping as already occurred so nothing left to do.
>> */
>> - set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags);
>> + if (test_and_set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags))
>> + return;
>
> This could lead to pre mature oom victim selection
> oom_reaper exiting victim
> oom_reap_task exit_mmap
> __oom_reap_task_mm __oom_reap_task_mm
> test_and_set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE) # wins the race
> test_and_set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE)
> set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP) # new victim can be selected now.
>
> Besides that, why should we back off in the first place. We can
> race the two without any problems AFAICS. We already do have proper
> synchronization between the two due to mmap_sem and MMF_OOM_SKIP.
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index fc41c0543d7f..4642964f7741 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -3073,9 +3073,7 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> * which clears VM_LOCKED, otherwise the oom reaper cannot
> * reliably test it.
> */
> - mutex_lock(&oom_lock);
> __oom_reap_task_mm(mm);
> - mutex_unlock(&oom_lock);
>
> set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
David and Michal are using different version as a baseline here.
David is making changes using timeout based back off (in linux-next.git)
which is inappropriately trying to use MMF_UNSTABLE for two purposes.
Michal is making changes using current code (in linux.git) which does not
address David's concern.
My version ( https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=153119509215026 ) is
making changes using current code which also provides oom-badness
based back off in order to address David's concern.
> down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
Anyway, I suggest doing
mutex_lock(&oom_lock);
set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
mutex_unlock(&oom_lock);
like I mentioned at
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201807130620.w6D6KiAJ093010@www262.sakura.ne.jp
even if we make changes on top of linux-next's timeout based back off.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-13 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-12 21:34 [patch -mm] mm, oom: remove oom_lock from exit_mmap David Rientjes
2018-07-13 6:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-13 14:26 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-13 21:18 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2018-07-16 6:13 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-16 7:04 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-16 7:44 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-16 10:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-16 11:15 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-17 4:22 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-17 4:14 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44d26c25-6e09-49de-5e90-3c16115eb337@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).