linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	kwankhede@nvidia.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
	fiuczy@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/15] s390/vfio-ap: implement in-use callback for vfio_ap driver
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 13:23:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <458e4bfe-6736-42b5-a510-21a4594df0e1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5cf7d611-e30c-226d-0d3d-d37170f117f4@linux.ibm.com>



On 2020-04-16 16:45, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/16/20 7:18 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Tue,  7 Apr 2020 15:20:04 -0400
>> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Let's implement the callback to indicate when an APQN
>>> is in use by the vfio_ap device driver. The callback is
>>> invoked whenever a change to the apmask or aqmask would
>>> result in one or more queue devices being removed from the driver. The
>>> vfio_ap device driver will indicate a resource is in use
>>> if the APQN of any of the queue devices to be removed are assigned to
>>> any of the matrix mdevs under the driver's control.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c     |  1 +
>>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c     | 47 +++++++++++++++++----------
>>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h |  2 ++
>>>   3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>> @@ -1369,3 +1371,14 @@ void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct ap_queue 
>>> *queue)
>>>       kfree(q);
>>>       mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>>   }
>>> +
>>> +bool vfio_ap_mdev_resource_in_use(unsigned long *apm, unsigned long 
>>> *aqm)
>>> +{
>>> +    bool in_use;
>>> +
>>> +    mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> +    in_use = vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(NULL, apm, aqm) ? true : 
>>> false;
>> Maybe
>>
>> in_use = !!vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(NULL, apm, aqm);
>>
>> ?
> 
> To be honest, I find the !! expression very confusing. Every time I see 
> it, I have
> to spend time thinking about what the result of !! is going to be. I think
> the statement should be left as-is because it more clearly expresses
> the intent.



In other places you use
"
         ret = vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(matrix_mdev);
         if (ret)
                 goto share_err;
"
then why use a boolean here?

If you want to return a boolean and you do not want to use !! you can do:

  ...
   ret = vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(NULL, apm, aqm);
...
   return (ret) ? false : true;

> 
>>
>>> +    mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> +
>>> +    return in_use;
>>> +}
> 

-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-17 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-07 19:20 [PATCH v7 00/15] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] s390/vfio-ap: store queue struct in hash table for quick access Tony Krowiak
2020-04-08 10:48   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-08 15:38     ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-08 16:27       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-08 16:34         ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-24  3:57   ` Halil Pasic
2020-04-27 13:05     ` Harald Freudenberger
2020-04-27 15:17       ` Halil Pasic
2020-04-27 21:48         ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-28 10:07           ` Halil Pasic
2020-04-28 10:57             ` Harald Freudenberger
2020-04-28 22:30               ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-29  7:56                 ` Harald Freudenberger
2020-04-29 11:30               ` Halil Pasic
2020-04-28 10:46         ` Harald Freudenberger
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] s390/vfio-ap: manage link between queue struct and matrix mdev Tony Krowiak
2020-04-09 15:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-10 15:32     ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-10 15:41     ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] s390/zcrypt: driver callback to indicate resource in use Tony Krowiak
2020-04-14 12:08   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-15 17:10     ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-16 10:05       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-16 14:35         ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-14 12:58   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-15  6:08     ` Harald Freudenberger
2020-04-16  9:33       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-17 13:54         ` Harald Freudenberger
2020-04-15 17:10     ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-16  9:37       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-24  3:33         ` Halil Pasic
2020-04-24 17:07           ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-24 18:23             ` Halil Pasic
2020-04-27 21:36               ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-27  8:20   ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-27 22:24     ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-28  8:09       ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-28 11:07       ` Harald Freudenberger
2020-04-28 14:37         ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] s390/vfio-ap: implement in-use callback for vfio_ap driver Tony Krowiak
2020-04-16 11:18   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-16 14:45     ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-17 11:23       ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2020-04-24  3:13       ` Halil Pasic
2020-04-24 16:58         ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] s390/vfio-ap: introduce shadow CRYCB Tony Krowiak
2020-04-16 11:58   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-21 21:39     ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] s390/vfio-ap: sysfs attribute to display the guest CRYCB Tony Krowiak
2020-04-08 10:33   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-08 16:38     ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-08 16:46       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-09 14:18         ` Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] s390/vfio-ap: filter CRYCB bits for unavailable queue devices Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] s390/vfio_ap: add qlink from ap_matrix_mdev struct to vfio_ap_queue struct Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] s390/vfio-ap: allow assignment of unavailable AP queues to mdev device Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] s390/vfio-ap: allow configuration of matrix mdev in use by a KVM guest Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] s390/vfio-ap: allow hot plug/unplug of AP resources using mdev device Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] s390/zcrypt: Notify driver on config changed and scan complete callbacks Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] s390/vfio-ap: handle host AP config change notification Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] s390/vfio-ap: handle AP bus scan completed notification Tony Krowiak
2020-04-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] s390/vfio-ap: handle probe/remove not due to host AP config changes Tony Krowiak
2020-05-07 15:03 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] s390/zcrypt: driver callback to indicate resource in use Tony Krowiak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=458e4bfe-6736-42b5-a510-21a4594df0e1@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).