From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>, rae l <crquan@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -Os versus -O2
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:31:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <467F1ADE.10803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <467F191C.9090506@gmail.com>
On 06/25/2007 03:23 AM, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 06/25/2007 02:41 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>> The interesting questions are:
>> Does -Os still sometimes generate faster code with gcc 4.2?
>> If yes, why?
>
> I would wager that the CPU type makes more of a difference than the
> compiler version. That is, I'd expect my Duron with it's "puny" 64K L1
> to have a very different profile than it's Athlon brother with 256K L1.
Sorry, that should've been L2. And "its" ...
> Not to mention CPUs with as little as 8K L1 (P1).
>
> I can't quote numbers -- it's a bit hard to test those things anyway as
> it's a system-global effect and not su much that's easily isolated in a
> dedicated benchmark.
And while I'm at it, "and not so much one that's [ ...]".
Rene.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-25 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-23 5:15 [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization Denis Cheng
2007-06-23 7:59 ` Oleg Verych
2007-06-23 13:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-23 13:41 ` Oleg Verych
2007-06-23 13:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-23 15:21 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-24 12:58 ` rae l
2007-06-24 22:25 ` Oleg Verych
2007-06-24 22:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-24 23:23 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-06-25 0:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-25 0:12 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-06-25 0:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-25 0:41 ` -Os versus -O2 Adrian Bunk
2007-06-25 0:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-25 1:08 ` david
2007-06-25 1:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-25 1:33 ` david
2007-06-25 1:41 ` Rene Herman
2007-06-25 5:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-25 7:08 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 7:15 ` david
2007-06-25 7:41 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 8:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-25 8:41 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 7:03 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 7:13 ` david
2007-06-25 7:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 1:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-25 1:23 ` Rene Herman
2007-06-25 1:31 ` Rene Herman [this message]
2007-06-25 1:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-25 1:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-25 2:19 ` david
2007-06-24 23:33 ` memset() with zeroes (Re: [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization) Oleg Verych
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=467F1ADE.10803@gmail.com \
--to=rene.herman@gmail.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=crquan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olecom@flower.upol.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).