* [PATCH] x86: Remove 'e' from kprope structure members
[not found] ` <47602776.10408@zytor.com>
@ 2007-12-12 19:27 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-12 23:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2007-12-12 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, LKML
Some kprobe structure members had a superfluous e in their
name.
eflags -> flags
esp -> sp
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
---
Ingo, this applies on top of my kprobes unification patch.
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
include/asm-x86/kprobes.h | 10 +++++-----
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c
index 6585ec5..44bc600 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c
@@ -195,26 +195,26 @@ static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
{
kcb->prev_kprobe.kp = kprobe_running();
kcb->prev_kprobe.status = kcb->kprobe_status;
- kcb->prev_kprobe.old_eflags = kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
- kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_eflags = kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
+ kcb->prev_kprobe.old_flags = kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
+ kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_flags = kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
}
static void __kprobes restore_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
{
__get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = kcb->prev_kprobe.kp;
kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe.status;
- kcb->kprobe_old_eflags = kcb->prev_kprobe.old_eflags;
- kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags = kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_eflags;
+ kcb->kprobe_old_flags = kcb->prev_kprobe.old_flags;
+ kcb->kprobe_saved_flags = kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_flags;
}
static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
{
__get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = p;
- kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags = kcb->kprobe_old_eflags
+ kcb->kprobe_saved_flags = kcb->kprobe_old_flags
= (regs->flags & (TF_MASK | IF_MASK));
if (is_IF_modifier(p->opcode))
- kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags &= ~IF_MASK;
+ kcb->kprobe_saved_flags &= ~IF_MASK;
}
static __always_inline void clear_btf(void)
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static int __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS &&
*p->ainsn.insn == BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
regs->flags &= ~TF_MASK;
- regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
+ regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
goto no_kprobe;
}
/* We have reentered the kprobe_handler(), since
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static void __kprobes resume_execution(struct kprobe *p,
switch (p->ainsn.insn[0]) {
case 0x9c: /* pushfl */
*tos &= ~(TF_MASK | IF_MASK);
- *tos |= kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
+ *tos |= kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
break;
case 0xc2: /* iret/ret/lret */
case 0xc3:
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int __kprobes post_kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
resume_execution(cur, regs, kcb);
- regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
+ regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
trace_hardirqs_fixup_flags(regs->flags);
/*Restore back the original saved kprobes variables and continue. */
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
* normal page fault.
*/
regs->ip = (unsigned long)cur->addr;
- regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
+ regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
else
@@ -703,8 +703,8 @@ int __kprobes setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs;
- kcb->jprobe_saved_esp = ®s->sp;
- addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
+ kcb->jprobe_saved_sp = ®s->sp;
+ addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
/*
* TBD: As Linus pointed out, gcc assumes that the callee
@@ -730,23 +730,23 @@ void __kprobes jprobe_return(void)
" .globl jprobe_return_end \n"
" jprobe_return_end: \n"
" nop \n"::"b"
- (kcb->jprobe_saved_esp):"memory");
+ (kcb->jprobe_saved_sp):"memory");
}
int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
u8 *addr = (u8 *) (regs->ip - 1);
- unsigned long stack_addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
+ unsigned long stack_addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
if ((addr > (u8 *) jprobe_return) && (addr < (u8 *) jprobe_return_end)) {
- if (®s->sp != kcb->jprobe_saved_esp) {
+ if (®s->sp != kcb->jprobe_saved_sp) {
struct pt_regs *saved_regs =
- container_of(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp,
+ container_of(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp,
struct pt_regs, sp);
printk("current sp %p does not match saved sp %p\n",
- ®s->sp, kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
+ ®s->sp, kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
printk("Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
show_registers(saved_regs);
printk("Current registers\n");
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
index a0ec7c2..3d1f1fa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
@@ -234,26 +234,26 @@ static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
{
kcb->prev_kprobe.kp = kprobe_running();
kcb->prev_kprobe.status = kcb->kprobe_status;
- kcb->prev_kprobe.old_eflags = kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
- kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_eflags = kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
+ kcb->prev_kprobe.old_flags = kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
+ kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_flags = kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
}
static void __kprobes restore_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
{
__get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = kcb->prev_kprobe.kp;
kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe.status;
- kcb->kprobe_old_eflags = kcb->prev_kprobe.old_eflags;
- kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags = kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_eflags;
+ kcb->kprobe_old_flags = kcb->prev_kprobe.old_flags;
+ kcb->kprobe_saved_flags = kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_flags;
}
static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
{
__get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = p;
- kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags = kcb->kprobe_old_eflags
+ kcb->kprobe_saved_flags = kcb->kprobe_old_flags
= (regs->flags & (TF_MASK | IF_MASK));
if (is_IF_modifier(p->ainsn.insn))
- kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags &= ~IF_MASK;
+ kcb->kprobe_saved_flags &= ~IF_MASK;
}
static __always_inline void clear_btf(void)
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS &&
*p->ainsn.insn == BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
regs->flags &= ~TF_MASK;
- regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
+ regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
goto no_kprobe;
} else if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE) {
/* TODO: Provide re-entrancy from
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void __kprobes resume_execution(struct kprobe *p,
switch (*insn) {
case 0x9c: /* pushfl */
*tos &= ~(TF_MASK | IF_MASK);
- *tos |= kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
+ *tos |= kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
break;
case 0xc3: /* ret/lret */
case 0xcb:
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static int __kprobes post_kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
resume_execution(cur, regs, kcb);
- regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
+ regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
trace_hardirqs_fixup_flags(regs->flags);
/* Restore the original saved kprobes variables and continue. */
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
* normal page fault.
*/
regs->ip = (unsigned long)cur->addr;
- regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
+ regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
else
@@ -694,8 +694,8 @@ int __kprobes setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs;
- kcb->jprobe_saved_esp = (long *) regs->sp;
- addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
+ kcb->jprobe_saved_sp = (long *) regs->sp;
+ addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
/*
* As Linus pointed out, gcc assumes that the callee
* owns the argument space and could overwrite it, e.g.
@@ -720,23 +720,23 @@ void __kprobes jprobe_return(void)
" .globl jprobe_return_end \n"
" jprobe_return_end: \n"
" nop \n"::"b"
- (kcb->jprobe_saved_esp):"memory");
+ (kcb->jprobe_saved_sp):"memory");
}
int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
u8 *addr = (u8 *) (regs->ip - 1);
- unsigned long stack_addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
+ unsigned long stack_addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
if ((addr > (u8 *) jprobe_return) && (addr < (u8 *) jprobe_return_end)) {
- if ((long *)regs->sp != kcb->jprobe_saved_esp) {
+ if ((long *)regs->sp != kcb->jprobe_saved_sp) {
struct pt_regs *saved_regs =
- container_of(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp,
+ container_of(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp,
struct pt_regs, sp);
printk("current sp %p does not match saved sp %p\n",
- (long *)regs->sp, kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
+ (long *)regs->sp, kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
printk("Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
show_registers(saved_regs);
printk("Current registers\n");
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/kprobes.h b/include/asm-x86/kprobes.h
index 074ac7d..87b9d1b 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/kprobes.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/kprobes.h
@@ -73,16 +73,16 @@ struct arch_specific_insn {
struct prev_kprobe {
struct kprobe *kp;
unsigned long status;
- unsigned long old_eflags;
- unsigned long saved_eflags;
+ unsigned long old_flags;
+ unsigned long saved_flags;
};
/* per-cpu kprobe control block */
struct kprobe_ctlblk {
unsigned long kprobe_status;
- unsigned long kprobe_old_eflags;
- unsigned long kprobe_saved_eflags;
- long *jprobe_saved_esp;
+ unsigned long kprobe_old_flags;
+ unsigned long kprobe_saved_flags;
+ long *jprobe_saved_sp;
struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
kprobe_opcode_t jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
--
1.5.3.7.2212.gd092
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove 'e' from kprope structure members
2007-12-12 19:27 ` [PATCH] x86: Remove 'e' from kprope structure members Harvey Harrison
@ 2007-12-12 23:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-12 23:08 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-12 23:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2007-12-12 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harvey Harrison; +Cc: H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, LKML
Harvey Harrison wrote:
> Some kprobe structure members had a superfluous e in their
> name.
>
> eflags -> flags
> esp -> sp
>
eflags and esp are the actual machine register names (at least in
32-bit), and therefore more distinctive than just "flags".
If this is in preparation for a unification then OK, but I disagree if
not (and technically 64-bit should be using rsp/rflags).
J
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> ---
> Ingo, this applies on top of my kprobes unification patch.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> include/asm-x86/kprobes.h | 10 +++++-----
> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c
> index 6585ec5..44bc600 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c
> @@ -195,26 +195,26 @@ static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> {
> kcb->prev_kprobe.kp = kprobe_running();
> kcb->prev_kprobe.status = kcb->kprobe_status;
> - kcb->prev_kprobe.old_eflags = kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
> - kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_eflags = kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
> + kcb->prev_kprobe.old_flags = kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
> + kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_flags = kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
> }
>
> static void __kprobes restore_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> {
> __get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = kcb->prev_kprobe.kp;
> kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe.status;
> - kcb->kprobe_old_eflags = kcb->prev_kprobe.old_eflags;
> - kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags = kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_eflags;
> + kcb->kprobe_old_flags = kcb->prev_kprobe.old_flags;
> + kcb->kprobe_saved_flags = kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_flags;
> }
>
> static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> {
> __get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = p;
> - kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags = kcb->kprobe_old_eflags
> + kcb->kprobe_saved_flags = kcb->kprobe_old_flags
> = (regs->flags & (TF_MASK | IF_MASK));
> if (is_IF_modifier(p->opcode))
> - kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags &= ~IF_MASK;
> + kcb->kprobe_saved_flags &= ~IF_MASK;
> }
>
> static __always_inline void clear_btf(void)
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static int __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS &&
> *p->ainsn.insn == BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
> regs->flags &= ~TF_MASK;
> - regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
> + regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
> goto no_kprobe;
> }
> /* We have reentered the kprobe_handler(), since
> @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static void __kprobes resume_execution(struct kprobe *p,
> switch (p->ainsn.insn[0]) {
> case 0x9c: /* pushfl */
> *tos &= ~(TF_MASK | IF_MASK);
> - *tos |= kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
> + *tos |= kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
> break;
> case 0xc2: /* iret/ret/lret */
> case 0xc3:
> @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int __kprobes post_kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
>
> resume_execution(cur, regs, kcb);
> - regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
> + regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
> trace_hardirqs_fixup_flags(regs->flags);
>
> /*Restore back the original saved kprobes variables and continue. */
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> * normal page fault.
> */
> regs->ip = (unsigned long)cur->addr;
> - regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
> + regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
> if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
> restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
> else
> @@ -703,8 +703,8 @@ int __kprobes setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>
> kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs;
> - kcb->jprobe_saved_esp = ®s->sp;
> - addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
> + kcb->jprobe_saved_sp = ®s->sp;
> + addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
>
> /*
> * TBD: As Linus pointed out, gcc assumes that the callee
> @@ -730,23 +730,23 @@ void __kprobes jprobe_return(void)
> " .globl jprobe_return_end \n"
> " jprobe_return_end: \n"
> " nop \n"::"b"
> - (kcb->jprobe_saved_esp):"memory");
> + (kcb->jprobe_saved_sp):"memory");
> }
>
> int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> u8 *addr = (u8 *) (regs->ip - 1);
> - unsigned long stack_addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
> + unsigned long stack_addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
> struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
>
> if ((addr > (u8 *) jprobe_return) && (addr < (u8 *) jprobe_return_end)) {
> - if (®s->sp != kcb->jprobe_saved_esp) {
> + if (®s->sp != kcb->jprobe_saved_sp) {
> struct pt_regs *saved_regs =
> - container_of(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp,
> + container_of(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp,
> struct pt_regs, sp);
> printk("current sp %p does not match saved sp %p\n",
> - ®s->sp, kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
> + ®s->sp, kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
> printk("Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
> show_registers(saved_regs);
> printk("Current registers\n");
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
> index a0ec7c2..3d1f1fa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
> @@ -234,26 +234,26 @@ static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> {
> kcb->prev_kprobe.kp = kprobe_running();
> kcb->prev_kprobe.status = kcb->kprobe_status;
> - kcb->prev_kprobe.old_eflags = kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
> - kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_eflags = kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
> + kcb->prev_kprobe.old_flags = kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
> + kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_flags = kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
> }
>
> static void __kprobes restore_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> {
> __get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = kcb->prev_kprobe.kp;
> kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe.status;
> - kcb->kprobe_old_eflags = kcb->prev_kprobe.old_eflags;
> - kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags = kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_eflags;
> + kcb->kprobe_old_flags = kcb->prev_kprobe.old_flags;
> + kcb->kprobe_saved_flags = kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_flags;
> }
>
> static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> {
> __get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = p;
> - kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags = kcb->kprobe_old_eflags
> + kcb->kprobe_saved_flags = kcb->kprobe_old_flags
> = (regs->flags & (TF_MASK | IF_MASK));
> if (is_IF_modifier(p->ainsn.insn))
> - kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags &= ~IF_MASK;
> + kcb->kprobe_saved_flags &= ~IF_MASK;
> }
>
> static __always_inline void clear_btf(void)
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS &&
> *p->ainsn.insn == BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
> regs->flags &= ~TF_MASK;
> - regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
> + regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
> goto no_kprobe;
> } else if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE) {
> /* TODO: Provide re-entrancy from
> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void __kprobes resume_execution(struct kprobe *p,
> switch (*insn) {
> case 0x9c: /* pushfl */
> *tos &= ~(TF_MASK | IF_MASK);
> - *tos |= kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
> + *tos |= kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
> break;
> case 0xc3: /* ret/lret */
> case 0xcb:
> @@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static int __kprobes post_kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
>
> resume_execution(cur, regs, kcb);
> - regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_eflags;
> + regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_saved_flags;
> trace_hardirqs_fixup_flags(regs->flags);
>
> /* Restore the original saved kprobes variables and continue. */
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> * normal page fault.
> */
> regs->ip = (unsigned long)cur->addr;
> - regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
> + regs->flags |= kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
> if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
> restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
> else
> @@ -694,8 +694,8 @@ int __kprobes setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>
> kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs;
> - kcb->jprobe_saved_esp = (long *) regs->sp;
> - addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
> + kcb->jprobe_saved_sp = (long *) regs->sp;
> + addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
> /*
> * As Linus pointed out, gcc assumes that the callee
> * owns the argument space and could overwrite it, e.g.
> @@ -720,23 +720,23 @@ void __kprobes jprobe_return(void)
> " .globl jprobe_return_end \n"
> " jprobe_return_end: \n"
> " nop \n"::"b"
> - (kcb->jprobe_saved_esp):"memory");
> + (kcb->jprobe_saved_sp):"memory");
> }
>
> int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> u8 *addr = (u8 *) (regs->ip - 1);
> - unsigned long stack_addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
> + unsigned long stack_addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
> struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
>
> if ((addr > (u8 *) jprobe_return) && (addr < (u8 *) jprobe_return_end)) {
> - if ((long *)regs->sp != kcb->jprobe_saved_esp) {
> + if ((long *)regs->sp != kcb->jprobe_saved_sp) {
> struct pt_regs *saved_regs =
> - container_of(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp,
> + container_of(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp,
> struct pt_regs, sp);
> printk("current sp %p does not match saved sp %p\n",
> - (long *)regs->sp, kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
> + (long *)regs->sp, kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
> printk("Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
> show_registers(saved_regs);
> printk("Current registers\n");
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/kprobes.h b/include/asm-x86/kprobes.h
> index 074ac7d..87b9d1b 100644
> --- a/include/asm-x86/kprobes.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/kprobes.h
> @@ -73,16 +73,16 @@ struct arch_specific_insn {
> struct prev_kprobe {
> struct kprobe *kp;
> unsigned long status;
> - unsigned long old_eflags;
> - unsigned long saved_eflags;
> + unsigned long old_flags;
> + unsigned long saved_flags;
> };
>
> /* per-cpu kprobe control block */
> struct kprobe_ctlblk {
> unsigned long kprobe_status;
> - unsigned long kprobe_old_eflags;
> - unsigned long kprobe_saved_eflags;
> - long *jprobe_saved_esp;
> + unsigned long kprobe_old_flags;
> + unsigned long kprobe_saved_flags;
> + long *jprobe_saved_sp;
> struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
> kprobe_opcode_t jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
> struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove 'e' from kprope structure members
2007-12-12 23:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
@ 2007-12-12 23:08 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-12 23:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2007-12-12 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, LKML
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:00 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > Some kprobe structure members had a superfluous e in their
> > name.
> >
> > eflags -> flags
> > esp -> sp
> >
>
> eflags and esp are the actual machine register names (at least in
> 32-bit), and therefore more distinctive than just "flags".
>
> If this is in preparation for a unification then OK, but I disagree if
> not (and technically 64-bit should be using rsp/rflags).
>
> J
My plan was to move forward with unifying these files. If this is still
acceptable I will add a comment block documenting this. This doesn't
affect anywhere outside of kprobes.h kprobes_32/64.c so if it is clean
to unify them, I'll leave them as sp with comment.
Harvey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove 'e' from kprope structure members
2007-12-12 23:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-12 23:08 ` Harvey Harrison
@ 2007-12-12 23:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-12 23:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2007-12-12 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: Harvey Harrison, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, LKML
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Harvey Harrison wrote:
>> Some kprobe structure members had a superfluous e in their
>> name.
>>
>> eflags -> flags
>> esp -> sp
>>
>
> eflags and esp are the actual machine register names (at least in
> 32-bit), and therefore more distinctive than just "flags".
>
> If this is in preparation for a unification then OK, but I disagree if
> not (and technically 64-bit should be using rsp/rflags).
>
Yes, that's the whole point (unification.)
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove 'e' from kprope structure members
2007-12-12 23:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2007-12-12 23:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-12 23:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2007-12-12 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: Harvey Harrison, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, LKML
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Harvey Harrison wrote:
>>> Some kprobe structure members had a superfluous e in their
>>> name.
>>>
>>> eflags -> flags
>>> esp -> sp
>>>
>>
>> eflags and esp are the actual machine register names (at least in
>> 32-bit), and therefore more distinctive than just "flags".
>> If this is in preparation for a unification then OK, but I disagree if
>> not (and technically 64-bit should be using rsp/rflags).
>>
>
> Yes, that's the whole point (unification.)
OK, great. I was just confused because the patch changelog didn't give
a proper rationale for the change (the 'e' isn't superfluous, and
removing it isn't a goal in itself).
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove 'e' from kprope structure members
2007-12-12 23:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
@ 2007-12-12 23:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2007-12-12 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: Harvey Harrison, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, LKML
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> Harvey Harrison wrote:
>>>> Some kprobe structure members had a superfluous e in their
>>>> name.
>>>>
>>>> eflags -> flags
>>>> esp -> sp
>>>>
>>> eflags and esp are the actual machine register names (at least in
>>> 32-bit), and therefore more distinctive than just "flags".
>>> If this is in preparation for a unification then OK, but I disagree if
>>> not (and technically 64-bit should be using rsp/rflags).
>>>
>> Yes, that's the whole point (unification.)
>
> OK, great. I was just confused because the patch changelog didn't give
> a proper rationale for the change (the 'e' isn't superfluous, and
> removing it isn't a goal in itself).
>
True, it probably should say it's a precursor to unification.
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-12 23:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1197421087.8761.27.camel@brick>
[not found] ` <47602776.10408@zytor.com>
2007-12-12 19:27 ` [PATCH] x86: Remove 'e' from kprope structure members Harvey Harrison
2007-12-12 23:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-12 23:08 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-12 23:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-12 23:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-12 23:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).