From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: fix section mismatch
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:20:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <479617CA.6050803@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080122055201.GA4810@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:34:09PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:38:38 +1100 Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>> rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
>>>> So if we have:
>>>> CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n
>>>> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
>>>>
>>>> then this is a oops candidate.
>>> At first glance, this can't happen because all CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU depends on
>>> CONFIG_HOTPLUG or selects it, for all archs.
>> Mostly, but arch/mips/ seems to be different (neither depends nor selects)
>> unless it has changed very recently (I looked at 2.6.24-rc8).
>
> mips has
> default n
>
> So they at least try to turn off this feature.
OK.
ISTM that conflating CONFIG_HOTPLUG and CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is both a
mistake and confusing. CONFIG_HOTPLUG help text specifically talks
about hot-pluggable devices and /dev. I can imagine some engineers
saying that CPUs and MEM are (abstract) devices, but I don't think that
most users would go that far, so I think that HOTPLUG and HOTPLUG_CPU
should be totally independent.
--
~Randy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-22 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-19 19:56 [PATCH] rcu: fix section mismatch Randy Dunlap
2008-01-19 21:25 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-21 0:38 ` Rusty Russell
2008-01-21 19:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-21 23:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-01-22 5:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-22 16:20 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=479617CA.6050803@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).