From: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] spi: spi-mem: add automatic poll status functions
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 09:29:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48d8774c-9868-27e5-b8b0-fdbf99c84ba2@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210510112249.5613978e@collabora.com>
Hi Boris
On 5/10/21 11:22 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2021 10:46:48 +0200
> Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + if (ctlr->mem_ops && ctlr->mem_ops->poll_status) {
>>>> + ret = spi_mem_access_start(mem);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + reinit_completion(&ctlr->xfer_completion);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = ctlr->mem_ops->poll_status(mem, op, mask, match,
>>>> + timeout_ms);
>>>> +
>>>> + ms = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctlr->xfer_completion,
>>>> + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
>>>
>>> Why do you need to wait here? I'd expect the poll_status to take care
>>> of this wait.
>>
>> It was a request from Mark Brown [1]. The idea is to implement
>> similar mechanism already used in SPI framework.
>
> Well, you have to choose, either you pass a timeout to ->poll_status()
> and let the driver wait for the status change (and return -ETIMEDOUT if
> it didn't happen in time), or you do it here and the driver only has to
> signal the core completion object. I think it's preferable to let the
> driver handle the timeout though, because you don't know how the
> status check will be implemented, and it's not like the
> reinit_completion()+wait_for_completion_timeout() done here would
> greatly simplify the drivers wait logic anyway.
>
Ok i will remove the reinit/wait_completion() as you suggested.
Thanks
Patrice
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-17 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-07 13:17 [PATCH v2 0/3] MTD: spinand: Add spi_mem_poll_status() support patrice.chotard
2021-05-07 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] spi: spi-mem: add automatic poll status functions patrice.chotard
2021-05-08 7:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-05-10 8:46 ` Patrice CHOTARD
2021-05-10 9:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-05-17 7:29 ` Patrice CHOTARD [this message]
2021-05-17 7:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-05-17 9:24 ` Patrice CHOTARD
2021-05-17 11:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-05-17 11:59 ` Patrice CHOTARD
2021-05-17 12:24 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-05-17 12:04 ` Patrice CHOTARD
2021-05-07 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: spinand: use the spi-mem poll status APIs patrice.chotard
2021-05-07 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] spi: stm32-qspi: add automatic poll status feature patrice.chotard
2021-05-07 19:29 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07 22:16 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48d8774c-9868-27e5-b8b0-fdbf99c84ba2@foss.st.com \
--to=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.kerello@foss.st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).