[PATCH v2 RESEND*3] ASoC: fsl MPC52xx drivers require PPC_BESTCOMM

[PATCH v2 RESEND*3] ASoC: fsl MPC52xx drivers require PPC_BESTCOMM

[Randy Dunlap]

Both SND_MPC52xx_SOC_PCM030 and SND_MPC52xx_SOC_EFIKA select
SND_SOC_MPC5200_AC97. The latter symbol depends on PPC_BESTCOMM,
so the 2 former symbols should also depend on PPC_BESTCOMM since
"select" does not follow any dependency chains.

This prevents a kconfig warning and build errors:

WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_SOC_MPC5200_AC97
  Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_POWERPC_SOC [=m] && PPC_MPC52xx [=y] && PPC_BESTCOMM [=n]
  Selected by [m]:
  - SND_MPC52xx_SOC_PCM030 [=m] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_POWERPC_SOC [=m] && PPC_MPC5200_SIMPLE [=y]
  - SND_MPC52xx_SOC_EFIKA [=m] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_POWERPC_SOC [=m] && PPC_EFIKA [=y]

ERROR: modpost: "mpc5200_audio_dma_destroy" [sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "mpc5200_audio_dma_create" [sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.ko] undefined!

Fixes: 40d9ec14e7e1 ("ASoC: remove BROKEN from Efika and pcm030 fabric drivers")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>
Cc: Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Acked-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>
---
v2: use correct email address for Mark Brown.

 sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -- a/sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig b/sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ config SND_SOC_MPC5200_AC97
 
 config SND_MPC52xx_SOC_PCM030
 	tristate "SoC AC97 Audio support for Phytec pcm030 and WM9712"
-	depends on PPC_MPC5200_SIMPLE
+	depends on PPC_MPC5200_SIMPLE && PPC_BESTCOMM
 	select SND_SOC_MPC5200_AC97
 	select SND_SOC_WM9712
 	help
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ config SND_MPC52xx_SOC_PCM030
 
 config SND_MPC52xx_SOC_EFIKA
 	tristate "SoC AC97 Audio support for bbplan Efika and STAC9766"
-	depends on PPC_EFIKA
+	depends on PPC_EFIKA && PPC_BESTCOMM
 	select SND_SOC_MPC5200_AC97
 	select SND_SOC_STAC9766
 	help

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND*3] ASoC: fsl MPC52xx drivers require PPC_BESTCOMM

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 366 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:59:41PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Both SND_MPC52xx_SOC_PCM030 and SND_MPC52xx_SOC_EFIKA select
> SND_SOC_MPC5200_AC97. The latter symbol depends on PPC_BESTCOMM,
> so the 2 former symbols should also depend on PPC_BESTCOMM since
> "select" does not follow any dependency chains.

Take a hint, it's not clear that the patch is tasteful.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND*3] ASoC: fsl MPC52xx drivers require PPC_BESTCOMM

[Randy Dunlap]

On 8/3/23 04:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:59:41PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Both SND_MPC52xx_SOC_PCM030 and SND_MPC52xx_SOC_EFIKA select
>> SND_SOC_MPC5200_AC97. The latter symbol depends on PPC_BESTCOMM,
>> so the 2 former symbols should also depend on PPC_BESTCOMM since
>> "select" does not follow any dependency chains.
> 
> Take a hint, it's not clear that the patch is tasteful.

Thank you for replying.  I'll drop it and just report the build errors.

-- 
~Randy

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND*3] ASoC: fsl MPC52xx drivers require PPC_BESTCOMM

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 865 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 11:09:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 8/3/23 04:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:59:41PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> >> Both SND_MPC52xx_SOC_PCM030 and SND_MPC52xx_SOC_EFIKA select
> >> SND_SOC_MPC5200_AC97. The latter symbol depends on PPC_BESTCOMM,
> >> so the 2 former symbols should also depend on PPC_BESTCOMM since
> >> "select" does not follow any dependency chains.

> > Take a hint, it's not clear that the patch is tasteful.

> Thank you for replying.  I'll drop it and just report the build errors.

To be clear I generally don't give you review comments because in the
past I grew so frustrated with having them and their escalations
ignored that it seemed better to just not start.  If the patch seems
fine I generally apply it, usually you just don't resend patches so that
works. 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]