From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] KVM: x86: tell guests if the exposed SMT topology is trustworthy
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 20:01:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f835a11-1528-a04e-9e06-1b8cdb97a04d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de3cade3-c069-dc6b-1d2d-aa10abe365b8@redhat.com>
On 2019-11-05 3:56 p.m., Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/11/19 17:17, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> There is also one additional piece of the information missing. A VM can be
>> sharing physical cores with other VMs (or other userspace tasks on the
>> host) so does KVM_FEATURE_TRUSTWORTHY_SMT imply that it's not the case or
>> not? It is unclear if this changes anything and can probably be left out
>> of scope (just don't do that).
>>
>> Similar to the already existent 'NoNonArchitecturalCoreSharing' Hyper-V
>> enlightenment, the default value of KVM_HINTS_TRUSTWORTHY_SMT is set to
>> !cpu_smt_possible(). KVM userspace is thus supposed to pass it to guest's
>> CPUIDs in case it is '1' (meaning no SMT on the host at all) or do some
>> extra work (like CPU pinning and exposing the correct topology) before
>> passing '1' to the guest.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
>> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 2 ++
>> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst
>> index 01b081f6e7ea..64b94103fc90 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst
>> @@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ KVM_FEATURE_PV_SCHED_YIELD 13 guest checks this feature bit
>> before using paravirtualized
>> sched yield.
>>
>> +KVM_FEATURE_TRUSTWORTHY_SMT 14 set when host supports 'SMT
>> + topology is trustworthy' hint
>> + (KVM_HINTS_TRUSTWORTHY_SMT).
>> +
>
> Instead of defining a one-off bit, can we make:
>
> ecx = the set of known "hints" (defaults to edx if zero)
>
> edx = the set of hints that apply to the virtual machine
Just to resurrect this thread, the guest could explicitly ACK
a KVM_FEATURE_DYNAMIC_HINT at init. This would allow the host
to change the hints whenever with the guest not needing to separately
ACK the changed hints.
Ankur
>
> Paolo
>
6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-06 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-05 16:17 [PATCH RFC] KVM: x86: tell guests if the exposed SMT topology is trustworthy Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-11-05 17:17 ` Liran Alon
2019-11-05 17:30 ` Liran Alon
2019-11-05 17:35 ` Jim Mattson
2019-11-05 19:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-05 23:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-07 10:38 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
[not found] ` <943488A8-2DD7-4471-B3C7-9F21A0B0BCF9@dinechin.org>
2019-11-07 15:02 ` Liran Alon
2019-11-08 15:35 ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-11-08 15:52 ` Liran Alon
2019-11-05 20:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-05 23:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-06 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-20 10:13 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-11-05 23:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-06 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 9:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-05 23:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-06 4:01 ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2019-12-06 13:46 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-12-06 20:31 ` Ankur Arora
2019-12-09 9:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f835a11-1528-a04e-9e06-1b8cdb97a04d@oracle.com \
--to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).