* [Bug #14792] Misdetection of the TV output
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #14949] drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
` (33 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Adam Jackson, Eric Anholt,
Santi, Zhao Yakui
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14792
Subject : Misdetection of the TV output
Submitter : Santi <santi@agolina.net>
Date : 2009-12-12 13:28 (65 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/27dfaf4f5825a119305db1bc63bef30ed400e376
Handled-By : Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #14949] drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:31 ` [Bug #14792] Misdetection of the TV output Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #14937] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2830 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (32 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Borislav Petkov, DRI,
Eric W. Biederman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14949
Subject : drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-12-26 9:45 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126182073616279&w=4
Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@aristanetworks.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/70461/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #14937] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2830
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:31 ` [Bug #14792] Misdetection of the TV output Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #14949] drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15025] Oops in ext4 driver Rafael J. Wysocki
` (31 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Grant Wilson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14937
Subject : WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2830
Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
Date : 2009-12-27 13:35 (50 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126192220404829&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15025] Oops in ext4 driver
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #14937] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2830 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
` (30 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Steinar H. Gunderson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15025
Subject : Oops in ext4 driver
Submitter : Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
Date : 2010-01-10 13:09 (36 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15025] Oops in ext4 driver Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-15 11:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15036] soft lockup in dmesg after suspend/resume Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Casteyde,
Eric W. Biederman, Linus Torvalds, Tejun Heo
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2010-01-06 21:52 (40 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-15 11:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-15 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2010-02-15 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Casteyde, Linus Torvalds, Tejun Heo,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999
> Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
> Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
> Date : 2010-01-06 21:52 (40 days old)
I have a set of patches to clear up the sysfs lockdep false positives.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/11/329
It requires sprinking a bunch of sysfs_attr_init on the few dynamically
allocated sysfs attributes, and I haven't found them all yet. Otherwise
it seems to be working well.
Greg should pick up those patches shortly and they should be appearing
in linux-next and then ultimately in 2.6.34.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
2010-02-15 11:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
@ 2010-02-15 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-15 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Casteyde, Linus Torvalds, Tejun Heo,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Monday 15 February 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999
> > Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
> > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
> > Date : 2010-01-06 21:52 (40 days old)
>
> I have a set of patches to clear up the sysfs lockdep false positives.
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/11/329
>
> It requires sprinking a bunch of sysfs_attr_init on the few dynamically
> allocated sysfs attributes, and I haven't found them all yet. Otherwise
> it seems to be working well.
>
> Greg should pick up those patches shortly and they should be appearing
> in linux-next and then ultimately in 2.6.34.
Great, I'm glad that these issues are being worked on.
Thanks for the information.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15036] soft lockup in dmesg after suspend/resume
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #14950] tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, ykzhao, Zou, Nanhai
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15036
Subject : soft lockup in dmesg after suspend/resume
Submitter : ykzhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Date : 2010-01-04 5:36 (42 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126258356202722&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #14950] tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15036] soft lockup in dmesg after suspend/resume Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15039] leds_alix2: can't allocate I/O for GPIO Rafael J. Wysocki
` (27 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Lin Ming, Mike Galbraith
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14950
Subject : tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date : 2009-12-25 11:11 (52 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126174044213172&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15039] leds_alix2: can't allocate I/O for GPIO
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #14950] tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15044] Much higher wakeups for "<kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts" since 2.6.32.2 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Arnd Hannemann, Daniel Mack
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15039
Subject : leds_alix2: can't allocate I/O for GPIO
Submitter : Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
Date : 2010-01-07 10:26 (39 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126286001106257&w=4
Handled-By : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/72006/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15044] Much higher wakeups for "<kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts" since 2.6.32.2
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15039] leds_alix2: can't allocate I/O for GPIO Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-15 4:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15114] X.org hang with [drm:i915_gem_do_execbuffer] *ERROR* in dmesg Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
Greg Kroah-Hartman, Ingo Molnar, Ingo Molnar, Mike Galbraith,
Mike Galbraith, Roman Mamedov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15044
Subject : Much higher wakeups for "<kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts" since 2.6.32.2
Submitter : Roman Mamedov <roman@rm.pp.ru>
Date : 2010-01-11 02:58 (35 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/a1f84a3ab8e002159498814eaa7e48c33752b04b
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15044] Much higher wakeups for "<kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts" since 2.6.32.2
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15044] Much higher wakeups for "<kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts" since 2.6.32.2 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-15 4:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-02-15 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Mike Galbraith @ 2010-02-15 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Greg Kroah-Hartman, Ingo Molnar, Roman Mamedov
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 00:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15044
> Subject : Much higher wakeups for "<kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts" since 2.6.32.2
> Submitter : Roman Mamedov <roman@rm.pp.ru>
> Date : 2010-01-11 02:58 (35 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/a1f84a3ab8e002159498814eaa7e48c33752b04b
I don't know that this should be carried as a regression.
Yes, the code in question increases cross cpu wakeups, but that's the
entire point. If there is any overlap in execution larger than the cost
of running a scheduler on another core, that time can be converted to
throughput.
Tip AF_UNIX lmbench numbers show that throughput gain being realized,
TCP numbers below that (x) show what can be had for apps which do a lot
of what that microbenchmark does, given a tiny enabler patchlet.
*Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS Pipe AF TCP File Mmap Bcopy Bcopy Mem Mem
UNIX reread reread (libc) (hand) read write
--------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -----
marge 2.6.31.9-smp 2853 2923 1132 2829.3 4761.9 1235.0 1234.4 4472 1683.
marge 2.6.31.9-smp 2839 2921 1141 2846.5 4779.8 1242.5 1235.9 4455 1684.
marge 2.6.31.9-smp 2838 2935 751. 2838.5 4820.0 1243.6 1235.0 4472 1684.
marge 2.6.33-tip-smp 3057 5166 859. 2760.2 4827.8 1481.1 1466.1 4499 1811.
marge 2.6.33-tip-smp 1796 5165 1257 2748.6 4817.4 1481.1 1464.8 4487 1806.
marge 2.6.33-tip-smp 3055 5175 1262 2763.4 4812.4 1483.9 1462.7 4477 1810.
marge 2.6.33-tip-smpx 3063 5140 2940 2811.1 4740.0 1235.8 1237.0 4433 1673.
marge 2.6.33-tip-smpx 3065 5205 2945 2836.3 4794.4 1243.6 1233.7 4293 1686.
marge 2.6.33-tip-smpx 3058 5181 2940 2785.4 4700.2 1243.9 1234.5 4415 1682.
(1. tip memory numbers are phase-of-moon anomaly.. irrelevant here)
(2. pipe numbers are only possible with pipe buffer increase patch in
tip. Often, pipes are truly synchronous, so waking cross CPU is small
loss. In tip, it's a win because of optimistic mutex spin.. context
switch cost is converted to throughput. That throughput gain also
cannot be had if you don't do the cross cpu wakeup to get the ball
rolling. The code in question is acting as enabler for spintex.)
So yeah, the code in question _will_ cause more cross CPU wakeups, and
it _may_ cost power. It may _save_ power by getting the job done more
efficiently. Dunno.
Regression? Depends on what you're measuring.
-Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15044] Much higher wakeups for "<kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts" since 2.6.32.2
2010-02-15 4:30 ` Mike Galbraith
@ 2010-02-15 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-15 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Galbraith
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Greg Kroah-Hartman, Ingo Molnar, Roman Mamedov
On Monday 15 February 2010, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 00:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15044
> > Subject : Much higher wakeups for "<kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts" since 2.6.32.2
> > Submitter : Roman Mamedov <roman@rm.pp.ru>
> > Date : 2010-01-11 02:58 (35 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/a1f84a3ab8e002159498814eaa7e48c33752b04b
>
> I don't know that this should be carried as a regression.
>
> Yes, the code in question increases cross cpu wakeups, but that's the
> entire point. If there is any overlap in execution larger than the cost
> of running a scheduler on another core, that time can be converted to
> throughput.
>
> Tip AF_UNIX lmbench numbers show that throughput gain being realized,
> TCP numbers below that (x) show what can be had for apps which do a lot
> of what that microbenchmark does, given a tiny enabler patchlet.
>
> *Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Host OS Pipe AF TCP File Mmap Bcopy Bcopy Mem Mem
> UNIX reread reread (libc) (hand) read write
> --------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -----
> marge 2.6.31.9-smp 2853 2923 1132 2829.3 4761.9 1235.0 1234.4 4472 1683.
> marge 2.6.31.9-smp 2839 2921 1141 2846.5 4779.8 1242.5 1235.9 4455 1684.
> marge 2.6.31.9-smp 2838 2935 751. 2838.5 4820.0 1243.6 1235.0 4472 1684.
> marge 2.6.33-tip-smp 3057 5166 859. 2760.2 4827.8 1481.1 1466.1 4499 1811.
> marge 2.6.33-tip-smp 1796 5165 1257 2748.6 4817.4 1481.1 1464.8 4487 1806.
> marge 2.6.33-tip-smp 3055 5175 1262 2763.4 4812.4 1483.9 1462.7 4477 1810.
> marge 2.6.33-tip-smpx 3063 5140 2940 2811.1 4740.0 1235.8 1237.0 4433 1673.
> marge 2.6.33-tip-smpx 3065 5205 2945 2836.3 4794.4 1243.6 1233.7 4293 1686.
> marge 2.6.33-tip-smpx 3058 5181 2940 2785.4 4700.2 1243.9 1234.5 4415 1682.
>
> (1. tip memory numbers are phase-of-moon anomaly.. irrelevant here)
> (2. pipe numbers are only possible with pipe buffer increase patch in
> tip. Often, pipes are truly synchronous, so waking cross CPU is small
> loss. In tip, it's a win because of optimistic mutex spin.. context
> switch cost is converted to throughput. That throughput gain also
> cannot be had if you don't do the cross cpu wakeup to get the ball
> rolling. The code in question is acting as enabler for spintex.)
>
> So yeah, the code in question _will_ cause more cross CPU wakeups, and
> it _may_ cost power. It may _save_ power by getting the job done more
> efficiently. Dunno.
>
> Regression? Depends on what you're measuring.
OK, so I'm going to close this report as "documented", since this is
intentional behavior.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15114] X.org hang with [drm:i915_gem_do_execbuffer] *ERROR* in dmesg
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15044] Much higher wakeups for "<kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts" since 2.6.32.2 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15076] System panic under load with clockevents_program_event Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Matej Laitl
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15114
Subject : X.org hang with [drm:i915_gem_do_execbuffer] *ERROR* in dmesg
Submitter : Matej Laitl <strohel@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-01-23 19:54 (23 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15076] System panic under load with clockevents_program_event
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15114] X.org hang with [drm:i915_gem_do_execbuffer] *ERROR* in dmesg Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15142] sysfs-related lockdep warning in __blkdev_get Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, okias
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15076
Subject : System panic under load with clockevents_program_event
Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-01-17 13:03 (29 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15142] sysfs-related lockdep warning in __blkdev_get
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15076] System panic under load with clockevents_program_event Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15139] e1000: transmit queue 0 timed out Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Matti Aarnio, NeilBrown
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15142
Subject : sysfs-related lockdep warning in __blkdev_get
Submitter : Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio--kernel-bugzilla@zmailer.org>
Date : 2010-01-25 13:38 (21 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15139] e1000: transmit queue 0 timed out
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15142] sysfs-related lockdep warning in __blkdev_get Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15177] Asynchronous writes up to 30% slower than in previous kernel versions Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alexander Beregalov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15139
Subject : e1000: transmit queue 0 timed out
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-01-23 15:37 (23 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=126426149306083&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15177] Asynchronous writes up to 30% slower than in previous kernel versions
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15139] e1000: transmit queue 0 timed out Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-15 7:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15192] netperf ~50% regression with 2.6.33-rc1, bisect to 1b9508f Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bart Van Assche
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15177
Subject : Asynchronous writes up to 30% slower than in previous kernel versions
Submitter : Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-01-30 16:38 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15177] Asynchronous writes up to 30% slower than in previous kernel versions
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15177] Asynchronous writes up to 30% slower than in previous kernel versions Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-15 7:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2010-02-15 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2010-02-15 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15177
> Subject : Asynchronous writes up to 30% slower than in previous kernel versions
> Submitter : Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-01-30 16:38 (16 days old)
Hello Rafael,
I thought your plan was to move this item to the 2.6.28 regression
list ? See also
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/msg/474762980e717a13?pli=1.
Bart.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15177] Asynchronous writes up to 30% slower than in previous kernel versions
2010-02-15 7:09 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2010-02-15 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-15 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bart Van Assche
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Monday 15 February 2010, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15177
> > Subject : Asynchronous writes up to 30% slower than in previous kernel versions
> > Submitter : Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-01-30 16:38 (16 days old)
>
> Hello Rafael,
>
> I thought your plan was to move this item to the 2.6.28 regression
> list ? See also
> http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/msg/474762980e717a13?pli=1.
Thanks for reminding me about that, done now.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15192] netperf ~50% regression with 2.6.33-rc1, bisect to 1b9508f
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15177] Asynchronous writes up to 30% slower than in previous kernel versions Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15200] NFS problems in 2.6.33-rc6: Unknown error 526 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Ingo Molnar, Lin Ming,
Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15192
Subject : netperf ~50% regression with 2.6.33-rc1, bisect to 1b9508f
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date : 2010-01-25 10:03 (21 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1b9508f6831e10d53256825de8904caa22d1ca2c
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126441481427331&w=4
Handled-By : Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15200] NFS problems in 2.6.33-rc6: Unknown error 526
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15192] netperf ~50% regression with 2.6.33-rc1, bisect to 1b9508f Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15202] lockdep warning during elevator_switch Rafael J. Wysocki
` (18 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, J.A. Magallón
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
Subject : NFS problems in 2.6.33-rc6: Unknown error 526
Submitter : J.A. Magallón <jamagallon@ono.com>
Date : 2010-01-31 22:46 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126497800408928&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15202] lockdep warning during elevator_switch
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15200] NFS problems in 2.6.33-rc6: Unknown error 526 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15244] PROBLEM: hda-intel divide by zero kernel crash in azx_position_ok() Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Hugh Dickins
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15202
Subject : lockdep warning during elevator_switch
Submitter : Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Date : 2010-01-31 23:55 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126498212613051&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15244] PROBLEM: hda-intel divide by zero kernel crash in azx_position_ok()
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15202] lockdep warning during elevator_switch Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15207] Pineview - only cursor on black screen visible, "GPU hung" in dmesg Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jody Bruchon, Takashi Iwai
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15244
Subject : PROBLEM: hda-intel divide by zero kernel crash in azx_position_ok()
Submitter : Jody Bruchon <jody@nctritech.com>
Date : 2010-02-06 0:32 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126541276028173&w=2
Handled-By : Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Jody Bruchon <jody@nctritech.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15207] Pineview - only cursor on black screen visible, "GPU hung" in dmesg
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15244] PROBLEM: hda-intel divide by zero kernel crash in azx_position_ok() Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15246] BUG: Bad page state in process portageq Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Friedemann, Li Peng
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15207
Subject : Pineview - only cursor on black screen visible, "GPU hung" in dmesg
Submitter : Christian Friedemann <dawn2k@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-02-01 20:15 (14 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15246] BUG: Bad page state in process portageq
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15207] Pineview - only cursor on black screen visible, "GPU hung" in dmesg Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15245] [2.6.33-rc6 Weird JCPU times? Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Johannes Hirte
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15246
Subject : BUG: Bad page state in process portageq
Submitter : Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
Date : 2010-02-07 0:45 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126550356515887&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15245] [2.6.33-rc6 Weird JCPU times?
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15246] BUG: Bad page state in process portageq Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15248] KMS broken on Intel 855GM broken with 2.6.32/33 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Shawn Starr
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15245
Subject : [2.6.33-rc6 Weird JCPU times?
Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com>
Date : 2010-02-06 7:24 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126544107816889&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15248] KMS broken on Intel 855GM broken with 2.6.32/33
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15245] [2.6.33-rc6 Weird JCPU times? Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15259] Corruption with OpenGL since Intel's big DRM push on i945 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jesse Barnes, Michal Nowak
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15248
Subject : KMS broken on Intel 855GM broken with 2.6.32/33
Submitter : Michal Nowak <mnowak@redhat.com>
Date : 2010-02-07 09:59 (8 days old)
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/78947/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15259] Corruption with OpenGL since Intel's big DRM push on i945
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15248] KMS broken on Intel 855GM broken with 2.6.32/33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15276] latest git kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alexandre, Chris Wilson,
Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes, Kristian Høgsberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15259
Subject : Corruption with OpenGL since Intel's big DRM push on i945
Submitter : Alexandre <papouta@hotmail.com>
Date : 2010-02-08 13:19 (7 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/76446cac68568fc7f5168a27deaf803ed22a4360
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15276] latest git kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [#1]
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15259] Corruption with OpenGL since Intel's big DRM push on i945 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15273] Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Markus Trippelsdorf
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15276
Subject : latest git kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [#1]
Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Date : 2010-02-09 8:36 (6 days old)
Message-ID : <20100209083605.GA1766@arch.tripp.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126570498804223&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15273] Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15276] latest git kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-17 16:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15287] RadeonKMS segfaults kdm on mobility radeon x700 pcie Rafael J. Wysocki
` (9 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Frederic Weisbecker,
K.Prasad, Maneesh Soni, Michael Stefaniuc
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15273
Subject : Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1
Submitter : Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani@redhat.com>
Date : 2010-02-11 16:21 (4 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15273] Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15273] Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-17 16:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-17 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-02-17 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
K.Prasad, Maneesh Soni, Michael Stefaniuc
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:38:35AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15273
> Subject : Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1
> Submitter : Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani@redhat.com>
> Date : 2010-02-11 16:21 (4 days old)
We are taking care of it. It's actually two regressions.
One has a fix that seems to work, and I'm working on the other one,
trying to get that upstream before 2.6.33 gets released.
Please keep the ticket open for now.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15273] Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1
2010-02-17 16:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2010-02-17 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-17 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
K.Prasad, Maneesh Soni, Michael Stefaniuc
On Wednesday 17 February 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:38:35AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15273
> > Subject : Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1
> > Submitter : Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani@redhat.com>
> > Date : 2010-02-11 16:21 (4 days old)
>
>
> We are taking care of it. It's actually two regressions.
> One has a fix that seems to work, and I'm working on the other one,
> trying to get that upstream before 2.6.33 gets released.
>
> Please keep the ticket open for now.
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15287] RadeonKMS segfaults kdm on mobility radeon x700 pcie
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15273] Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15289] Regression 2.6.32 -> 2.6.33, Kernel needs a helping key to boot :) Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jan Kreuzer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15287
Subject : RadeonKMS segfaults kdm on mobility radeon x700 pcie
Submitter : Jan Kreuzer <kontrollator@gmx.de>
Date : 2010-02-12 17:58 (3 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15289] Regression 2.6.32 -> 2.6.33, Kernel needs a helping key to boot :)
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15287] RadeonKMS segfaults kdm on mobility radeon x700 pcie Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15277] 2.6.33-rc6 crashes on resume Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Asbjørn Sannes,
H. Peter Anvin, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, Venkatesh Pallipadi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15289
Subject : Regression 2.6.32 -> 2.6.33, Kernel needs a helping key to boot :)
Submitter : Asbjørn Sannes <kernelbugzilla@sannes.org>
Date : 2010-02-12 19:47 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/73472a46b5b28116b145fb5fc05242c1aa8e1461
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15277] 2.6.33-rc6 crashes on resume
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15289] Regression 2.6.32 -> 2.6.33, Kernel needs a helping key to boot :) Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15278] lockdep warning for iscsi in 2.6.33-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (6 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bill Davidsen, Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15277
Subject : 2.6.33-rc6 crashes on resume
Submitter : Bill Davidsen <davidsen@roadwarrior3.tmr.com>
Date : 2010-02-08 23:03 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <4B70982F.8090208@roadwarrior3.tmr.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126567021801935&w=2
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15278] lockdep warning for iscsi in 2.6.33-rc6
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15277] 2.6.33-rc6 crashes on resume Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15292] Laptop reboots instead of resume from suspend with any kernel after 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Tao Ma
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
Subject : lockdep warning for iscsi in 2.6.33-rc6
Submitter : Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-02-09 6:59 (6 days old)
Message-ID : <4B7107CF.3060703@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126569884330200&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15292] Laptop reboots instead of resume from suspend with any kernel after 2.6.31
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15278] lockdep warning for iscsi in 2.6.33-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15305] Dell video dies when booting Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dave Morgan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15292
Subject : Laptop reboots instead of resume from suspend with any kernel after 2.6.31
Submitter : Dave Morgan <davemorgan353@btinternet.com>
Date : 2010-02-13 13:11 (2 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15305] Dell video dies when booting
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15292] Laptop reboots instead of resume from suspend with any kernel after 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15308] 2.6.33-rc8 breaks UML with Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Ronis
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15305
Subject : Dell video dies when booting
Submitter : David Ronis <ronis@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca>
Date : 2010-02-14 1:07 (1 days old)
Message-ID : <1266109622.11290.10.camel@montroll.chem.mcgill.ca>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126611098225127&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15308] 2.6.33-rc8 breaks UML with Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15305] Dell video dies when booting Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-20 14:48 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15307] irq11: nobody cared, during yenta registration Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 subsequent siblings)
34 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
Jouni Malinen, KOSAKI Motohiro, Linus Torvalds, Michael Neuling
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15308
Subject : 2.6.33-rc8 breaks UML with Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit
Submitter : Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Date : 2010-02-14 16:40 (1 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/803bf5ec259941936262d10ecc84511b76a20921
Message-ID : <20100214164023.GA2726@jm.kir.nu>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126616751807902&w=4
Handled-By : Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15308] 2.6.33-rc8 breaks UML with Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15308] 2.6.33-rc8 breaks UML with Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-20 14:48 ` Américo Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Américo Wang @ 2010-02-20 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Andrew Morton, Jouni Malinen, KOSAKI Motohiro, Linus Torvalds,
Michael Neuling
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:38:37AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
>of recent regressions.
>
>The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
>know (either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15308
>Subject : 2.6.33-rc8 breaks UML with Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit
>Submitter : Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
>Date : 2010-02-14 16:40 (1 days old)
>First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/803bf5ec259941936262d10ecc84511b76a20921
>Message-ID : <20100214164023.GA2726@jm.kir.nu>
>References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126616751807902&w=4
>Handled-By : Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
>
It should be fixed by this patch:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/15/61
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15307] irq11: nobody cared, during yenta registration
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15308] 2.6.33-rc8 breaks UML with Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15306] Filesystem I/O is CPU-bound Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-15 9:52 ` 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafał Miłecki
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Meelis Roos
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15307
Subject : irq11: nobody cared, during yenta registration
Submitter : Meelis Roos <mroos@ut.ee>
Date : 2010-02-14 15:32 (1 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.SOC.1.00.1002141720120.679@math.ut.ee>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126616327302771&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* [Bug #15306] Filesystem I/O is CPU-bound
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15307] irq11: nobody cared, during yenta registration Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-15 9:52 ` 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafał Miłecki
34 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, James Cloos
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15306
Subject : Filesystem I/O is CPU-bound
Submitter : James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Date : 2010-02-14 3:11 (1 days old)
Message-ID : <m3pr48bjfg.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126611738629349&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-02-14 23:31 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-14 23:38 ` [Bug #15306] Filesystem I/O is CPU-bound Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-15 9:52 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-02-15 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
34 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2010-02-15 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development,
Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List,
DRI
2010/2/15 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15287
> Subject : RadeonKMS segfaults kdm on mobility radeon x700 pcie
> Submitter : Jan Kreuzer <kontrollator@gmx.de>
> Date : 2010-02-12 17:58 (3 days old)
Can you reassign this according to last comments, please?
--
Rafał
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-02-15 9:52 ` 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafał Miłecki
@ 2010-02-15 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-15 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafał Miłecki, Linus Torvalds
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Linux Wireless List, DRI, Andrew Morton
On Monday 15 February 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2010/2/15 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15287
> > Subject : RadeonKMS segfaults kdm on mobility radeon x700 pcie
> > Submitter : Jan Kreuzer <kontrollator@gmx.de>
> > Date : 2010-02-12 17:58 (3 days old)
>
> Can you reassign this according to last comments, please?
Reassigned to PCI.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread