* Any thoughts when 2.6.0-test10 is due?
@ 2003-11-10 9:56 Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2003-11-10 16:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ruth Ivimey-Cook @ 2003-11-10 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
... It's been a couple of weeks since -test9 came out, and I'd quite like
to get a kernel that includes the various good patches that have been
proposed since then.
Ruth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Any thoughts when 2.6.0-test10 is due?
2003-11-10 9:56 Any thoughts when 2.6.0-test10 is due? Ruth Ivimey-Cook
@ 2003-11-10 16:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Valdis.Kletnieks @ 2003-11-10 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ruth Ivimey-Cook; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 580 bytes --]
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:56:39 GMT, Ruth Ivimey-Cook <Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@ivimey.org> said:
> ... It's been a couple of weeks since -test9 came out, and I'd quite like
> to get a kernel that includes the various good patches that have been
> proposed since then.
Make note that a lot of the more intrusive patches will be deferred to 2.6.1,
which will have a patch easily 10x the size of the -test[789] ones (Linus
is being intentionally very picky about what goes into the tree). I'm
going to predict that the 2.6.0->2.6.1 patch will be well over a megabyte
even after gzipping.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-10 16:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-10 9:56 Any thoughts when 2.6.0-test10 is due? Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2003-11-10 16:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).