* Inconsistency in /proc/cpuinfo about topology ?
@ 2012-09-14 13:37 JA Magallón
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: JA Magallón @ 2012-09-14 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel
Hi...
Probably there is something I don't understand, but it looks to me like an
inconsistency in the info given by /proc/cpuinfo about processor/core/thread
topology.
For new processors, data seems to account for each 'physycal id', all virtual
processors in the same package repeat the same info:
- Core i5:
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
cpu cores : 4
- Core i3:
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
cpu cores : 2
- Dual Xeon X5365
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
cpu cores : 4
physical id : 1
siblings : 4
cpu cores : 4
- Core Q9450
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
cpu cores : 4
but for older CPUs or lower end it is not the same:
- Dual P4-Xeon:
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
cpu cores : 1
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
cpu cores : 0
physical id : 3
siblings : 1
cpu cores : 1
physical id : 3
siblings : 1
cpu cores : 0
- Single P4 HT:
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
cpu cores : 1
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
cpu cores : 0
What am I missing ?
TIA
--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()ono!com> \ Winter is coming...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-09-14 14:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-14 13:37 Inconsistency in /proc/cpuinfo about topology ? JA Magallón
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).