Re: [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: automatically flushable packets aren't allowed on LE links

[Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>]

Hi Steven,

>>>> I think Marcel was after just providing a clarifying code comment in
>>>> both places - having two branches of an if-statement doing exactly the
>>>> same thing looks a bit weird to me. To make thins completely clear I'd
>>>> suggest adding a simple helper function that you can call from both
>>>> places to get the needed flags, something like the following:
>>> 
>>> I am actually fine with just adding a comment explaining the complex if
>>> statement on why it is correct. It is just a helper for everybody to
>>> understand what and why it is done that way.
>> 
>> 
>> Is the comment I added sufficient, or should I add one for the other if
>> condition as well?  To me, the second condition is pretty straightforward:
>> if the caller requested it and the hardware supports it, use NO_FLUSH.  The
>> relationship between FLUSH/NO_FLUSH and low-energy is much less clear and
>> more justifies a comment, in my opinion.
> 
> Did a miss a reply to this?  How would you like the next iteration of
> the patch to look?

can you just send a v4 and I have a look at it. I thing it is best to keep the original patch with the rather complicated if statement you had. And then add a comment in front of it, why it is that way and that it is correct this way.

Regards

Marcel