linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ric Mason <ric.masonn@gmail.com>
To: Li Haifeng <omycle@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Should a swapped out page be deleted from swap cache?
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:10:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51372423.3060709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513722AA.2030001@gmail.com>

On 03/06/2013 07:04 PM, Ric Mason wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 01:34 PM, Li Haifeng wrote:
>> 2013/2/20 Ric Mason <ric.masonn@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi Hugh,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/20/2013 02:56 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Ric Mason wrote:
>>>>> There is a call of try_to_free_swap in function swap_writepage, if
>>>>> swap_writepage is call from shrink_page_list path, 
>>>>> PageSwapCache(page) ==
>>>>> trure, PageWriteback(page) maybe false, page_swapcount(page) == 0, 
>>>>> then
>>>>> will
>>>>> delete the page from swap cache and free swap slot, where I miss?
>>>> That's correct.  PageWriteback is sure to be false there. 
>>>> page_swapcount
>>>> usually won't be 0 there, but sometimes it will be, and in that 
>>>> case we
>>>> do want to delete from swap cache and free the swap slot.
>>>
>>> 1) If PageSwapCache(page)  == true, PageWriteback(page) == false,
>>> page_swapcount(page) == 0  in swap_writepage(shrink_page_list path), 
>>> then
>>> will delete the page from swap cache and free swap slot, in function
>>> swap_writepage:
>>>
>>> if (try_to_free_swap(page)) {
>>>      unlock_page(page);
>>>      goto out;
>>> }
>>> writeback will not execute, that's wrong. Where I miss?
>> when the page is deleted from swap cache and corresponding swap slot
>> is free, the page is set dirty. The dirty page won't be reclaimed. It
>> is not wrong.
>
> I don't think so. For dirty pages, there are two steps: 1)writeback 
> 2)reclaim. Since PageSwapCache(page) == true && PageWriteback(page) == 
> false && page_swapcount(page) == 0 in swap_writeback(), 
> try_to_free_swap() will return true and writeback will be skip. Then 
> how can step one be executed?

s/swap_writeback()/swap_writepage()

Btw, Hi Hugh, could you explain more to us? :-)

>
>>
>> corresponding path lists as below.
>> when swap_writepage() is called by pageout() in shrink_page_list().
>> pageout() will return PAGE_SUCCESS. For PAGE_SUCCESS, when
>> PageDirty(page) is true, this reclaiming page will be keeped in the
>> inactive LRU list.
>> shrink_page_list()
>> {
>> ...
>>   904                         switch (pageout(page, mapping, sc)) {
>>   905                         case PAGE_KEEP:
>>   906                                 nr_congested++;
>>   907                                 goto keep_locked;
>>   908                         case PAGE_ACTIVATE:
>>   909                                 goto activate_locked;
>>   910                         case PAGE_SUCCESS:
>>   911                                 if (PageWriteback(page))
>>   912                                         goto keep_lumpy;
>>   913                                 if (PageDirty(page))
>>   914                                         goto keep;
>> ...}
>>
>>> 2) In the function pageout, page will be set PG_Reclaim flag, since 
>>> this
>>> flag is set, end_swap_bio_write->end_page_writeback:
>>> if (TestClearPageReclaim(page))
>>>       rotate_reclaimable_page(page);
>>> it means that page will be add to the tail of lru list, page is clean
>>> anonymous page this time and will be reclaim to buddy system soon, 
>>> correct?
>> correct
>>> If is correct, what is the meaning of rotate here?
>> Rotating here is to add the page to the tail of inactive LRU list. So
>> this page will be reclaimed ASAP while reclaiming.
>>
>>>> Hugh
>>>
>


      reply	other threads:[~2013-03-06 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-18 10:48 Should a swapped out page be deleted from swap cache? Li Haifeng
2013-02-18 18:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-19  0:39   ` Will Huck
2013-02-19 19:06     ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-20  0:43       ` Will Huck
2013-02-19  2:04   ` Li Haifeng
2013-02-19  2:38     ` Will Huck
2013-02-19  6:53       ` Li Haifeng
2013-02-19  9:38         ` Sha Zhengju
2013-02-19 18:49           ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-19  8:32   ` Ric Mason
2013-02-19 18:56     ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-20  0:40       ` Ric Mason
2013-03-06  5:34         ` Li Haifeng
2013-03-06 11:04           ` Ric Mason
2013-03-06 11:10             ` Ric Mason [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51372423.3060709@gmail.com \
    --to=ric.masonn@gmail.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=omycle@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).