linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Will Huck <will.huckk@gmail.com>
Cc: Li Haifeng <omycle@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Should a swapped out page be deleted from swap cache?
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:06:15 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1302191056390.2248@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5122C9B3.10306@gmail.com>

On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Will Huck wrote:
> 
> Another question:

I don't see the connection to deleting a swapped out page from swap cache.

> 
> Why kernel memory mapping use direct mapping instead of kmalloc/vmalloc which
> will setup mapping on demand?

I may misunderstand you, and "kernel memory mapping".

kmalloc does not set up a mapping, it uses the direct mapping already set up.

It would be circular if the basic page allocation primitives used kmalloc,
since kmalloc relies on the basic page allocation primitives.

vmalloc is less efficient than using the direct mapping (repeated setup
and teardown, no use of hugepages), but necessary when you want a larger
virtual array than you're likely to find from the buddy allocator.

Hugh

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-19 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-18 10:48 Should a swapped out page be deleted from swap cache? Li Haifeng
2013-02-18 18:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-19  0:39   ` Will Huck
2013-02-19 19:06     ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2013-02-20  0:43       ` Will Huck
2013-02-19  2:04   ` Li Haifeng
2013-02-19  2:38     ` Will Huck
2013-02-19  6:53       ` Li Haifeng
2013-02-19  9:38         ` Sha Zhengju
2013-02-19 18:49           ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-19  8:32   ` Ric Mason
2013-02-19 18:56     ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-20  0:40       ` Ric Mason
2013-03-06  5:34         ` Li Haifeng
2013-03-06 11:04           ` Ric Mason
2013-03-06 11:10             ` Ric Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1302191056390.2248@eggly.anvils \
    --to=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=omycle@gmail.com \
    --cc=will.huckk@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).