linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86: mm: add_pfn_range_mapped: use meaningful index to teach clean_sort_range()
@ 2013-03-18 10:21 Lin Feng
  2013-03-18 18:52 ` Yinghai Lu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lin Feng @ 2013-03-18 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm
  Cc: linux-mm, x86, linux-kernel, tglx, mingo, hpa, yinghai, penberg,
	jacob.shin, Lin Feng

Since add_range_with_merge() return the max none zero element of the array, it's
suffice to use it to instruct clean_sort_range() to do the sort. Or the former
assignment by add_range_with_merge() is nonsense because clean_sort_range() 
will produce a accurate number of the sorted array and it never depends on
nr_pfn_mapped.

Cc: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/init.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
index 59b7fc4..55ae904 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void add_pfn_range_mapped(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
 {
 	nr_pfn_mapped = add_range_with_merge(pfn_mapped, E820_X_MAX,
 					     nr_pfn_mapped, start_pfn, end_pfn);
-	nr_pfn_mapped = clean_sort_range(pfn_mapped, E820_X_MAX);
+	nr_pfn_mapped = clean_sort_range(pfn_mapped, nr_pfn_mapped);
 
 	max_pfn_mapped = max(max_pfn_mapped, end_pfn);
 
-- 
1.8.0.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86: mm: add_pfn_range_mapped: use meaningful index to teach clean_sort_range()
  2013-03-18 10:21 [PATCH] x86: mm: add_pfn_range_mapped: use meaningful index to teach clean_sort_range() Lin Feng
@ 2013-03-18 18:52 ` Yinghai Lu
  2013-03-25  9:13   ` Lin Feng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2013-03-18 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lin Feng
  Cc: akpm, linux-mm, x86, linux-kernel, tglx, mingo, hpa, penberg, jacob.shin

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Since add_range_with_merge() return the max none zero element of the array, it's
> suffice to use it to instruct clean_sort_range() to do the sort. Or the former
> assignment by add_range_with_merge() is nonsense because clean_sort_range()
> will produce a accurate number of the sorted array and it never depends on
> nr_pfn_mapped.
>
> Cc: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/init.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> index 59b7fc4..55ae904 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void add_pfn_range_mapped(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>  {
>         nr_pfn_mapped = add_range_with_merge(pfn_mapped, E820_X_MAX,
>                                              nr_pfn_mapped, start_pfn, end_pfn);
> -       nr_pfn_mapped = clean_sort_range(pfn_mapped, E820_X_MAX);
> +       nr_pfn_mapped = clean_sort_range(pfn_mapped, nr_pfn_mapped);
>
>         max_pfn_mapped = max(max_pfn_mapped, end_pfn);>

Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86: mm: add_pfn_range_mapped: use meaningful index to teach clean_sort_range()
  2013-03-18 18:52 ` Yinghai Lu
@ 2013-03-25  9:13   ` Lin Feng
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lin Feng @ 2013-03-25  9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yinghai Lu, akpm
  Cc: linux-mm, x86, linux-kernel, tglx, mingo, hpa, penberg, jacob.shin

Hi Andrew,

On 03/19/2013 02:52 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> Since add_range_with_merge() return the max none zero element of the array, it's
>> suffice to use it to instruct clean_sort_range() to do the sort. Or the former
>> assignment by add_range_with_merge() is nonsense because clean_sort_range()
>> will produce a accurate number of the sorted array and it never depends on
>> nr_pfn_mapped.
>>
>> Cc: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
>> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/mm/init.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> index 59b7fc4..55ae904 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void add_pfn_range_mapped(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>>  {
>>         nr_pfn_mapped = add_range_with_merge(pfn_mapped, E820_X_MAX,
>>                                              nr_pfn_mapped, start_pfn, end_pfn);
>> -       nr_pfn_mapped = clean_sort_range(pfn_mapped, E820_X_MAX);
>> +       nr_pfn_mapped = clean_sort_range(pfn_mapped, nr_pfn_mapped);
>>
>>         max_pfn_mapped = max(max_pfn_mapped, end_pfn);>
> 
> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

Do we need to pick up this patch?

thanks,
linfeng

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-25  9:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-18 10:21 [PATCH] x86: mm: add_pfn_range_mapped: use meaningful index to teach clean_sort_range() Lin Feng
2013-03-18 18:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-25  9:13   ` Lin Feng

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).