linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: daniel.leung@linux.intel.com
Cc: jkosina@suse.cz, srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: hid-sensor-hub: do not process feature reports in raw_event
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:45:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51507136.4020308@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363886546-6517-1-git-send-email-daniel.leung@linux.intel.com>

Daniel,

I am looking at 3.9.rc1.
The only place I see the raw_event callback is called from 
hid/hid_input_report(). hid_input_report is called with type 
HID_INPUT_REPORT in all cases, except hid_ctrl(), where it can be 
different depending on xx.report->type. But here, the return value is 
not checked.

Do you know the call chain for HID_FETURE_REPORT, where this is creating 
problem?

Thanks,
Srinivas

On 03/21/2013 10:22 AM, daniel.leung@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@linux.intel.com>
>
> In sensor_hub_raw_event(), HID feature reports are ignored but are
> still marked as processed. This causes the in-kernel struct not to be
> updated. Any non-updated fields in the feature reports are zero, and
> they are being sent to the device. This causes confusion in the
> sensor hub firmware, and some sensors are not powered up as a result.
>
> This changes the raw_event rountine to only process input reports,
> and let the hid core handle the incoming feature reports.
>
> The issue has been observed on Acer Iconia W700.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> index ca749810..3f7df68 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int sensor_hub_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev,
>   			 report->id, size, report->type);
>   	hid_dbg(hdev, "maxfield:%d\n", report->maxfield);
>   	if (report->type != HID_INPUT_REPORT)
> -		return 1;
> +		return 0;
>   
>   	ptr = raw_data;
>   	ptr++; /*Skip report id*/


  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-25 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-21 17:22 [PATCH] HID: hid-sensor-hub: do not process feature reports in raw_event daniel.leung
2013-03-25 15:45 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2013-03-27 15:09   ` Jiri Kosina
2013-04-04  7:48     ` Jiri Kosina
2013-04-08 16:54     ` Daniel Leung
2013-04-09 23:55       ` Daniel Leung
2013-04-10 15:44         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-29 14:19           ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51507136.4020308@linux.intel.com \
    --to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.leung@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).