linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue.lkml@nexus-software.ie>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add check for P5 to microcode_intel_early
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:02:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5171BF0A.8010402@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5171BAD6.4040003@nexus-software.ie>

On 04/19/2013 02:44 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 19/04/13 22:25, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:55:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> Just filter out P5 and earlier. The code already does that for CPUs
>>> which don't have CPUID.
>>
>> Actually, an alternative - more practical albeit not very accurate
> 
> More practical ? Hmm - the MSRs don't exist for < P5

Yes, and that is definitional.

I like doing this check before boring down in the code too far, however,
I want to make it so that it is structurally clear that this is for
Intel; other CPU vendors might theoretically have other criteria.

Architecturally, I would prefer to do this check early in
load_ucode_intel_{bsp,ap}() but I would be okay with putting it in
load_ucode_bsp()/local_ucode_ap() as well as long as the test is
conditional on the Intel vendor check.

More importantly, though: I really would like to get a fix *today*.

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-19 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19 17:23 [PATCH] x86: Add check for P5 to microcode_intel_early Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-19 19:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-19 20:35   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-19 20:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-19 21:25       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-19 21:44         ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-19 22:02           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-04-19 23:13           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-20  9:24             ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-20 15:52               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-20  0:20 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, microcode: Verify the family before dispatching microcode patching tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-20 16:21   ` Bryan O'Donoghue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5171BF0A.8010402@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bryan.odonoghue.lkml@nexus-software.ie \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).