From: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com>
To: <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
<lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <balbi@ti.com>, <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
<t-kristo@ti.com>, <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:56:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B97B2B.6080400@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c73c260b90be6e1640a430e8cbba6cac@slimlogic.co.uk>
On 06/07/2013 05:44 PM, gg@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
> On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
>>> From: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
>>>
>>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by
>>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to
>>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in
>>> line with
>>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion.
>>>
>>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code.
>>
>> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as
>> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID
>> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might
>> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason.
>
> I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run!
>
> Graeme
>
Hello Mark, Graeme
So, what is your opinion? Could we move forward with this?
In addition, If twl6032 will be added on top of twl6025 there will be no
guarantee
that twl6025 will work because:
- there is no HW to verify
- there is no documentation on twl6025 available, so, in case if current
implementation is
different from what is needed for twl6032 - it can't be handled properly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-13 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 10:53 [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032 Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-06-07 14:36 ` Mark Brown
2013-06-07 14:44 ` gg
2013-06-13 7:56 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk [this message]
2013-06-13 10:21 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-06-13 10:32 ` Graeme Gregory
2013-06-13 10:38 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
[not found] ` <CAPb7_mtVg7Uz6jS5BwCCxo-dcju6Ophh4+QWG7N5zOHJQixw5A@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-13 11:20 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-06-19 8:35 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B97B2B.6080400@ti.com \
--to=oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).