From: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com>
To: <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
<lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <balbi@ti.com>, <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
<t-kristo@ti.com>, <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:21:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B99D0D.4050603@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c73c260b90be6e1640a430e8cbba6cac@slimlogic.co.uk>
On 06/07/2013 05:44 PM, gg@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
> On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
>>> From: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
>>>
>>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by
>>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to
>>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in
>>> line with
>>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion.
>>>
>>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code.
>>
>> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as
>> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID
>> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might
>> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason.
>
> I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run!
>
> Graeme
>
Hello Mark, Graeme,
Taking in account that:
- there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible;
- there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes to
twl6032 is not known;
- twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found on
ti.com <http://ti.com>
So, what do you think, can this change be accepted?
// I apologize for sending personal e-mails, not to the mail list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-13 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 10:53 [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032 Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-06-07 14:36 ` Mark Brown
2013-06-07 14:44 ` gg
2013-06-13 7:56 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-06-13 10:21 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk [this message]
2013-06-13 10:32 ` Graeme Gregory
2013-06-13 10:38 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
[not found] ` <CAPb7_mtVg7Uz6jS5BwCCxo-dcju6Ophh4+QWG7N5zOHJQixw5A@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-13 11:20 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-06-19 8:35 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B99D0D.4050603@ti.com \
--to=oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).