linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	xlpang@linux.alibaba.com, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: make the io_ticks counter more accurate
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 00:42:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533328c7-4158-d9fd-d8db-0d02eb9c5108@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41175786-8a02-62e0-fc79-955ec0e74aeb@kernel.dk>



On 2019/12/26 11:39 上午, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/25/19 8:10 PM, Wen Yang wrote:
>> Instead of the jiffies, we should update the io_ticks counter
>> with the passed in parameter 'now'.
> 
> I'm still missing some justification for this. What exactly is this
> patch trying to solve or improve? Your commit message says "we should",
> but why?
> 

Hi Jens,

Thank you for your comments.
We observed in the document that:

io_ticks
========

This value counts the number of milliseconds during which the device has
had I/O requests queued.

And the iostat command uses io_ticks count to calculate %util:
https://github.com/sysstat/sysstat/blob/master/rd_stats.c#L372

eg:
Device:         rrqm/s   wrqm/s     r/s     w/s    rkB/s    wkB/s 
avgrq-sz avgqu-sz   await r_await w_await  svctm  %util


So we need to unify the time windows of these statistics(io_ticks, 
rd_tick, time_in_queue, etc).
However, the current code uses jiffies to count io_ticks.
Jiffies is different from the passed in parameter 'now',
so these statistics will be inconsistent:

void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req, u64 now)
{
…
     update_io_ticks(part, jiffies);
     part_stat_inc(part, ios[sgrp]);
     part_stat_add(part, nsecs[sgrp], now - req->start_time_ns);
     part_stat_add(part, time_in_queue, nsecs_to_jiffies64(now - 
req->start_time_ns));
…
}

In addition, we also found another issue:
the update_io_tick() function only adds one to io_ticks at a time,
which will result in the calculated %util lower than the real one.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/block/bio.c#n1713


We will try our best to improve it.
please kindly help with some suggestions.
Thanks.

-- 
Best Regards,
Wen


      reply	other threads:[~2019-12-26 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-26  3:10 [PATCH v2] block: make the io_ticks counter more accurate Wen Yang
2019-12-26  3:39 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-26 16:42   ` Wen Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533328c7-4158-d9fd-d8db-0d02eb9c5108@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=wenyang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).