[PATCH] crypto: s5p-sss - Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

[PATCH] crypto: s5p-sss - Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
---
 drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
index d66e20a2f54c..2a16800d2579 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ struct s5p_hash_reqctx {
 	bool			error;
 
 	u32			bufcnt;
-	u8			buffer[0];
+	u8			buffer[];
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.0

Re: [PATCH] crypto: s5p-sss - Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

[Kamil Konieczny]

On 13.02.2020 18:21, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
> 
> struct foo {
>         int stuff;
>         struct boo array[];
> };
> 
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
> 
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
> 
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
> 
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=7fbec6f4-22720d30-7fbf4dbb-0cc47a314e9a-2a4d03985644c7ed&u=https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> index d66e20a2f54c..2a16800d2579 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ struct s5p_hash_reqctx {
>  	bool			error;
>  
>  	u32			bufcnt;
> -	u8			buffer[0];
> +	u8			buffer[];
>  };
>  
>  /**
> 

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@samsung.com>

-- 
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

Re: [PATCH] crypto: s5p-sss - Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 08:09, Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On 13.02.2020 18:21, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> > variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> > introduced in C99:
> >
> > struct foo {
> >         int stuff;
> >         struct boo array[];
> > };
> >
> > By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> > in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> > will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> > inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
> >
> > Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> > this change:
> >
> > "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> > may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> > zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
> >
> > This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
> >
> > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> > [2] https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=7fbec6f4-22720d30-7fbf4dbb-0cc47a314e9a-2a4d03985644c7ed&u=https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> > [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> > index d66e20a2f54c..2a16800d2579 100644
> > --- a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> > +++ b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> > @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ struct s5p_hash_reqctx {
> >       bool                    error;
> >
> >       u32                     bufcnt;
> > -     u8                      buffer[0];
> > +     u8                      buffer[];
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> >
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@samsung.com>

Why not making it simple/obvious u8 *buffer? Or fixed length (BUFLEN length)?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] crypto: s5p-sss - Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

[Herbert Xu]

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:21:30AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
> 
> struct foo {
>         int stuff;
>         struct boo array[];
> };
> 
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
> 
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
> 
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
> 
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Patch applied.  Thanks.
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt