linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kohli, Gaurav" <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@kernel.org,
	bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 16:53:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55221a5b-dd52-3359-f582-86830dd9f205@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cdd5d434-9c11-7c19-2895-0f7f3811eb11@codeaurora.org>

Corrected the formatting, Sorry for spam.


> 
> HI Peter,
> 
> We have tested with new patch and still seeing same issue, in this dumps 
> we don't have debug traces, but seems there still exist race from code 
> review , Can you please check it once:
> 
> Controller Thread                               CPUHP Thread
> takedown_cpu
> kthread_park
> kthread_parkme
> Set KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK
>                                                 smpboot_thread_fn
>                                                 set Task interruptible
> 
> 
> wake_up_process
> 
>                                                 Kthread_parkme
>                                                 SET TASK_PARKED
>                                                 schedule
>                                                 raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
> 
>                                                 context_switch
> 
>                                                 finish_lock_switch
> 
> 
> 
>                                                 Case TASK_PARKED
>                                                 kthread_park_complete
> 
> 
> SET TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
> 
> 
> And also seeing the same warning during unpark of cpuhp from controller:
>   if (!wait_task_inactive(p, state)) {
>                  WARN_ON(1);
>                  return;
>          }
> 325.065893] [<ffffff8920ed0200>] kthread_unpark+0x80/0xd8
> [  325.065902] [<ffffff8920eab754>] bringup_cpu+0xa0/0x12c
> [  325.065910] [<ffffff8920eaae90>] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb4/0x5c8
> [  325.065917] [<ffffff8920eabd98>] cpuhp_up_callbacks+0x3c/0x154
> [  325.065924] [<ffffff8920ead220>] _cpu_up+0x134/0x208
> [  325.065931] [<ffffff8920ead45c>] do_cpu_up+0x168/0x1a0
> [  325.065938] [<ffffff8920ead4b8>] cpu_up+0x24/0x30
> [  325.065948] [<ffffff89215b1408>] cpu_subsys_online+0x20/0x2c
> [  325.065956] [<ffffff89215aac64>] device_online+0x70/0xb4
> [  325.065962] [<ffffff89215aad78>] online_store+0xd0/0xdc
> [  325.065971] [<ffffff89215a7424>] dev_attr_store+0x40/0x54
> [  325.065982] [<ffffff89210d8a98>] sysfs_kf_write+0x5c/0x74
> [  325.065988] [<ffffff89210d7b9c>] kernfs_fop_write+0xcc/0x1ec
> [  325.065999] [<ffffff8921049288>] vfs_write+0xb4/0x1d0
> [  325.066006] [<ffffff892104a858>] SyS_write+0x60/0xc0
> [  325.066014] [<ffffff8920e83770>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
> 
> 
> And after this same crash occured:
> [  325.521307] [<ffffff8920ed4aac>] smpboot_thread_fn+0x26c/0x2c8
> [  325.527295] [<ffffff8920ecfb24>] kthread+0xf4/0x108
> 
> I will put more debug ftraces to check what is going on exactly.
> 
> Regards
> Gaurav
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, 
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-07 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-25  8:33 [PATCH v1] kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup Gaurav Kohli
2018-04-25 20:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26  4:04   ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-04-26  9:14     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26  8:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26  8:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 15:53       ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-04-30 11:17         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01  7:50           ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 10:18             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 10:40               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 10:40               ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 11:31                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 11:46                   ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 13:19                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02  5:15                       ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-02  8:20                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 10:13                           ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-07 11:09                             ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-07 11:23                               ` Kohli, Gaurav [this message]
2018-06-05 11:13                                 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 15:08                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-05 15:22                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-05 15:40                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-05 16:35                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-05 18:21                                           ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 20:13                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 13:51                                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-06 15:03                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 15:04                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 15:22                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 18:59                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-07  8:30                                                 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 10:44               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 16:02     ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-26 16:18     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-04-30 11:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-30 11:56         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-28  6:43 ` [lkp-robot] [kthread/smpboot] cad8e99675: inconsistent{IN-HARDIRQ-W}->{HARDIRQ-ON-W}usage kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55221a5b-dd52-3359-f582-86830dd9f205@codeaurora.org \
    --to=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).