From: "Kohli, Gaurav" <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@kernel.org,
bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 10:45:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b289790-9b3a-73bd-7166-bf39f32cefd8@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180501131904.GG12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 5/1/2018 6:49 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On 5/1/2018 5:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>>> Let me ponder what the best solution is, it's a bit of a mess.
>
> So there's:
>
> - TASK_PARKED, which we can make a special state; this solves the
> problem because then wait_task_inactive() is guaranteed to see
> TASK_PARKED and DTRT.
Yes this should work, as it takes pi-lock and blocking kthread_parkme.
>
> - complete(&kthread->parked), which we can do inside schedule(); this
> solves the problem because then kthread_park() will not return early
> and the task really is blocked.
I think complete will not help, as problem is like below :
Control Thread CPUHP thread
cpuhp_thread_fun
Wake control thread
complete(&st->done);
takedown_cpu
kthread_park
set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK
Here cpuhp is looping,
//success case
Generally when issue is not
coming
it schedule out by below :
ht->thread_should_run(td->cpu
scheduler
//failure case
before schedule
loop check
(kthread_should_park()
enter here as PARKED set
wake_up_process(k)
__kthread_parkme
complete(&self->parked);
SETS RUNNING
schedule
wait_for_completion(&kthread->parked);
So even we protect complete, it may see TASK_RUNNING as final state.
That's why we took pi-lock , So wake_up_process either see TASK_RUNNING
so return or it will exit early before parkme call.
Please correct me , if i misunderstood it. With pi-lock approach we are
not seeing issue. SO you first solution should fix this(put parked in
special state).
Regards
Gaurav
>
> and I'm fairly sure I thought of a 3rd way to cure things, but now that
> I'm writing things down I cannot seem to remember :/ -- could be we muck
> with wait_task_inactive().
>
> In any case, I hate all of them, but I think the completion one is the
> least horrible because it gives the strongest guarantees and cleans up
> most. But promoting TASK_PARKED to special certainly is the earier
> patch.
>
> The below boots, but that's about all I did with it. Opinions?
>
> ---
>
> --- a/include/linux/kthread.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kthread.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void *kthread_probe_data(struct task_str
> int kthread_park(struct task_struct *k);
> void kthread_unpark(struct task_struct *k);
> void kthread_parkme(void);
> +void kthread_park_complete(struct task_struct *k);
>
> int kthreadd(void *unused);
> extern struct task_struct *kthreadd_task;
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ enum KTHREAD_BITS {
> KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU = 0,
> KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP,
> KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK,
> - KTHREAD_IS_PARKED,
> };
>
> static inline void set_kthread_struct(void *kthread)
> @@ -177,14 +176,12 @@ void *kthread_probe_data(struct task_str
>
> static void __kthread_parkme(struct kthread *self)
> {
> - __set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
> - while (test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags)) {
> - if (!test_and_set_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags))
> - complete(&self->parked);
> + for (;;) {
> + set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
> + if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags))
> + break;
> schedule();
> - __set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
> }
> - clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags);
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> }
>
> @@ -194,6 +191,11 @@ void kthread_parkme(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_parkme);
>
> +void kthread_park_complete(struct task_struct *k)
> +{
> + complete(&to_kthread(k)->parked);
> +}
> +
> static int kthread(void *_create)
> {
> /* Copy data: it's on kthread's stack */
> @@ -450,22 +452,15 @@ void kthread_unpark(struct task_struct *
> {
> struct kthread *kthread = to_kthread(k);
>
> - clear_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
> /*
> - * We clear the IS_PARKED bit here as we don't wait
> - * until the task has left the park code. So if we'd
> - * park before that happens we'd see the IS_PARKED bit
> - * which might be about to be cleared.
> + * Newly created kthread was parked when the CPU was offline.
> + * The binding was lost and we need to set it again.
> */
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &kthread->flags)) {
> - /*
> - * Newly created kthread was parked when the CPU was offline.
> - * The binding was lost and we need to set it again.
> - */
> - if (test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags))
> - __kthread_bind(k, kthread->cpu, TASK_PARKED);
> - wake_up_state(k, TASK_PARKED);
> - }
> + if (test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags))
> + __kthread_bind(k, kthread->cpu, TASK_PARKED);
> +
> + clear_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
> + wake_up_state(k, TASK_PARKED);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_unpark);
>
> @@ -488,12 +483,13 @@ int kthread_park(struct task_struct *k)
> if (WARN_ON(k->flags & PF_EXITING))
> return -ENOSYS;
>
> - if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &kthread->flags)) {
> - set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
> - if (k != current) {
> - wake_up_process(k);
> - wait_for_completion(&kthread->parked);
> - }
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags)))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
> + if (k != current) {
> + wake_up_process(k);
> + wait_for_completion(&kthread->parked);
> }
>
> return 0;
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> */
> #include "sched.h"
>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> +
> #include <asm/switch_to.h>
> #include <asm/tlb.h>
>
> @@ -2718,20 +2720,28 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(str
> membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode(mm);
> mmdrop(mm);
> }
> - if (unlikely(prev_state == TASK_DEAD)) {
> - if (prev->sched_class->task_dead)
> - prev->sched_class->task_dead(prev);
> + if (unlikely(prev_state & (TASK_DEAD|TASK_PARKED))) {
> + switch (prev_state) {
> + case TASK_DEAD:
> + if (prev->sched_class->task_dead)
> + prev->sched_class->task_dead(prev);
> +
> + /*
> + * Remove function-return probe instances associated with this
> + * task and put them back on the free list.
> + */
> + kprobe_flush_task(prev);
>
> - /*
> - * Remove function-return probe instances associated with this
> - * task and put them back on the free list.
> - */
> - kprobe_flush_task(prev);
> + /* Task is done with its stack. */
> + put_task_stack(prev);
>
> - /* Task is done with its stack. */
> - put_task_stack(prev);
> + put_task_struct(prev);
> + break;
>
> - put_task_struct(prev);
> + case TASK_PARKED:
> + kthread_park_complete(prev);
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> tick_nohz_task_switch();
>
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-02 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 8:33 [PATCH v1] kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup Gaurav Kohli
2018-04-25 20:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 4:04 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-04-26 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 15:53 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-04-30 11:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 7:50 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 10:40 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 11:46 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 5:15 ` Kohli, Gaurav [this message]
2018-05-02 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 10:13 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-07 11:09 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-07 11:23 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 11:13 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 15:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-05 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-05 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-05 16:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-05 18:21 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 20:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 13:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-06 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 18:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-07 8:30 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 16:02 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-26 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-04-30 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-30 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-28 6:43 ` [lkp-robot] [kthread/smpboot] cad8e99675: inconsistent{IN-HARDIRQ-W}->{HARDIRQ-ON-W}usage kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b289790-9b3a-73bd-7166-bf39f32cefd8@codeaurora.org \
--to=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).