* Re: [RFC] signal:remove duplicate code
[not found] <5562B7CF.5090807@gmail.com>
@ 2015-05-25 8:53 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2015-05-25 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yalin wang, oleg, Paul McKenney, Andrew Morton, vdavydov; +Cc: linux-kernel
Am 25.05.2015 um 07:49 schrieb yalin wang:
> __dequeue_signal() is only called by dequeue_signal(), after that,
> dequeue_signal() will call recalc_sigpending(), this function will
> set or unset TIF_SIGPENDING bit, so we don't need do this in
> __dequeue_signal()
>
> Signed-off-by: yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/signal.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 836df8d..de33281 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -583,10 +583,9 @@ static int __dequeue_signal(struct sigpending *pending, sigset_t *mask,
> if (sig) {
> if (current->notifier) {
> if (sigismember(current->notifier_mask, sig)) {
> - if (!(current->notifier)(current->notifier_data)) {
> - clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
Here be dragons.
In __dequeue_signal() we clear TIF_SIGPENDING depending
on the result of ->notifier().
Did you double check that clearing that flag goes hand in hand
with recalc_sigpending()?
Thanks,
//richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-05-25 8:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <5562B7CF.5090807@gmail.com>
2015-05-25 8:53 ` [RFC] signal:remove duplicate code Richard Weinberger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).