linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support
@ 2015-08-11  0:52 David Long
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-11  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>

This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised by
reviewers and also fixes problems discovered during testing.

This patchset adds support for kernel probes(kprobes), jump probes(jprobes)
and return probes(kretprobes) support for ARM64.

The kprobes mechanism makes use of software breakpoint and single stepping
support available in the ARM v8 kernel.

This patch depends on:
	[PATCH 1/2] Move the pt_regs_offset struct definition from arch to common include file
	[PATCH 2/2] Consolidate redundant register/stack access code

Changes since v2 include:

1) Removal of NOP padding in kprobe XOL slots. Slots are now exactly one
instruction long.
2) Disabling of interrupts during execution in single-step mode.
3) Fixing of numerous problems in instruction simulation code (mostly
thanks to Will Cohen).
4) Support for the HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature is added, to allow
access to kprobes through debugfs.
5) kprobes is *not* enabled in defconfig.
6) Numerous complaints from checkpatch have been cleaned up, although a couple
remain as removing the function pointer typedefs results in ugly code.

Changes since v3 include:

1) Remove table-driven instruction parsing and replace with an if statement
calling out to old and new instruction test functions in insn.c.
2) I removed the addition of orig_x0 to ptrace.h.
3) Reorder the patches.
4) Replace the previous interrupt disabling (from Will Cohen) with
an improved solution (from Steve Capper).

Changes since v4 include:

1) Added insn.c functions to detect exception instructions and DAIF
   read/write instructions, and use them to reject probing same.
2) Changed adr detect function to also recognize adrp. Reject both.
3) Added missing __kprobes for some new functions.
4) Added call to kprobes_fault_handler from mm do_page_fault.
5) Reject all non-simulated branch/ret instructions, not just those
   that use an immediate offset.
6) Moved software breakpoint definitions into debug-monitors.h.
7) Removed "!XIP_KERNEL" from Kconfig.
8) changed kprobes_condition_check_t and kprobes_prepare_t to probes_*,
   for future sharing with uprobes.
9) Removed bogus call to kprobes_restore_local_irqflag() from 
   trampoline_probe_handler().

Changes since v5 include:

1) Replaced installation of breakpoint hook with direct call from the
handlers in debug-monitors.c, as requested.
2) Reject probing of instructions that read the interrupt mask, in
addition to instructions that set it.
3) Cleaned up comments describing usage of Debug Mask.
4) Added KPROBE_REENTER case in reenter_kprobe.
5) Corrected the ifdef'd definitions for notify_page_fault() to be
consistent when KPROBES is not configed.
6) Changed "cpsr" to "pstate" for HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature.
7) Added back in missing new files in previous patch.
8) Changed two instances of pr_warning() to pr_warn().

Note that there seems to be at least a potential issue with kprobes
on multiple (possibly all) platforms having to do with use of kfree
inside of the kretprobes trampoline handler.  This has manifested
occasionally in systemtap testing on arm64.  There does not appear to
be an simple solution to the problem.

Changes since v6 include:

1) New trampoline code from Will Cohen fixes the occasional failure seen
when processing kretprobes by replacing the software breakpoint with
assembly code to implement the return to the original execution stream.
2) Changed ip0, ip1, fp, and lr to plain numbered registers for purposes
of recognizing them as an ascii string in the stack/reg access code.
3) Removed orig_x0.
4) Moved ARM_x* defines from arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h to
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c.

Changes since v7 include:

1) Move trampoline entry/return code into separate ".S" file instead
of making it a macro in a header file.
2) Add missing register name definitions in asm-offsets.c and use them
in place of hard-coded integer offsets in the trampoline code.
3) Correct the values used to decode MSR immediate instructions, in insn.h.
4) Remove the currently unused simulate_none() function.

David A. Long (2):
  arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature
  arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c

Sandeepa Prabhu (4):
  arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support
  arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support
  arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes)
  kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module

William Cohen (1):
  arm64: Add trampoline code for kretprobes

 arch/arm64/Kconfig                       |   3 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h  |   5 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h            |  18 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h         |  64 +++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h          |  50 +++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h          |  28 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile               |   4 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c          |  22 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c       |  35 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c                 |  28 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c        | 166 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h        |  30 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c              | 644 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h              |  24 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes_trampoline.S   |  61 +++
 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c   | 122 ++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.c | 170 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.h |  32 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c               |  77 ++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S          |   1 +
 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                    |  25 ++
 samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c         |   8 +
 22 files changed, 1606 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes_trampoline.S
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.h

-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v8 1/7] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature
  2015-08-11  0:52 [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
@ 2015-08-11  0:52 ` David Long
  2015-08-11 17:31   ` Will Deacon
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c David Long
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-11  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>

Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature for arm64.

Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig              |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 25 +++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c      | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 318175f..ef5d726 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ config ARM64
 	select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
 	select HAVE_PERF_REGS
 	select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
+	select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
 	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
 	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
 	select IRQ_DOMAIN
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
index d6dd9fd..8f440e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ struct pt_regs {
 	u64 syscallno;
 };
 
+#define MAX_REG_OFFSET (sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) - sizeof(u64))
+
 #define arch_has_single_step()	(1)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
@@ -146,6 +148,29 @@ struct pt_regs {
 #define user_stack_pointer(regs) \
 	(!compat_user_mode(regs) ? (regs)->sp : (regs)->compat_sp)
 
+/**
+ * regs_get_register() - get register value from its offset
+ * @regs:	   pt_regs from which register value is gotten
+ * @offset:    offset number of the register.
+ *
+ * regs_get_register returns the value of a register whose offset from @regs.
+ * The @offset is the offset of the register in struct pt_regs.
+ * If @offset is bigger than MAX_REG_OFFSET, this returns 0.
+ */
+static inline u64 regs_get_register(struct pt_regs *regs,
+					      unsigned int offset)
+{
+	if (unlikely(offset > MAX_REG_OFFSET))
+		return 0;
+	return *(u64 *)((u64)regs + offset);
+}
+
+/* Valid only for Kernel mode traps. */
+static inline unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	return regs->sp;
+}
+
 static inline unsigned long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	return regs->regs[0];
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index d882b83..f6199a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -48,6 +48,83 @@
 #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
 #include <trace/events/syscalls.h>
 
+#define ARM_pstate	pstate
+#define ARM_pc		pc
+#define ARM_sp		sp
+#define ARM_x30		regs[30]
+#define ARM_x29		regs[29]
+#define ARM_x28		regs[28]
+#define ARM_x27		regs[27]
+#define ARM_x26		regs[26]
+#define ARM_x25		regs[25]
+#define ARM_x24		regs[24]
+#define ARM_x23		regs[23]
+#define ARM_x22		regs[22]
+#define ARM_x21		regs[21]
+#define ARM_x20		regs[20]
+#define ARM_x19		regs[19]
+#define ARM_x18		regs[18]
+#define ARM_x17		regs[17]
+#define ARM_x16		regs[16]
+#define ARM_x15		regs[15]
+#define ARM_x14		regs[14]
+#define ARM_x13		regs[13]
+#define ARM_x12		regs[12]
+#define ARM_x11		regs[11]
+#define ARM_x10		regs[10]
+#define ARM_x9		regs[9]
+#define ARM_x8		regs[8]
+#define ARM_x7		regs[7]
+#define ARM_x6		regs[6]
+#define ARM_x5		regs[5]
+#define ARM_x4		regs[4]
+#define ARM_x3		regs[3]
+#define ARM_x2		regs[2]
+#define ARM_x1		regs[1]
+#define ARM_x0		regs[0]
+
+#define REG_OFFSET_NAME(r) \
+	{.name = #r, .offset = offsetof(struct pt_regs, ARM_##r)}
+#define REG_OFFSET_END {.name = NULL, .offset = 0}
+
+const struct pt_regs_offset regs_offset_table[] = {
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x0),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x1),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x2),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x3),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x4),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x5),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x6),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x7),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x8),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x9),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x10),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x11),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x12),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x13),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x14),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x15),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x16),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x17),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x18),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x19),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x20),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x21),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x22),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x23),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x24),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x25),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x26),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x27),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x28),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x29),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x30),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(sp),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(pc),
+	REG_OFFSET_NAME(pstate),
+	REG_OFFSET_END,
+};
+
 /*
  * TODO: does not yet catch signals sent when the child dies.
  * in exit.c or in signal.c.
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v8 2/7] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c
  2015-08-11  0:52 [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
@ 2015-08-11  0:52 ` David Long
  2015-08-11 18:00   ` Will Deacon
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-11  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>

Certain instructions are hard to execute correctly out-of-line (as in
kprobes).  Test functions are added to insn.[hc] to identify these.  The
instructions include any that use PC-relative addressing, change the PC,
or change interrupt masking. For efficiency and simplicity test
functions are also added for small collections of related instructions.

Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c      | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
index 30e50eb..66bfb21 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
@@ -223,8 +223,13 @@ static __always_inline bool aarch64_insn_is_##abbr(u32 code) \
 static __always_inline u32 aarch64_insn_get_##abbr##_value(void) \
 { return (val); }
 
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(adr_adrp,	0x1F000000, 0x10000000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(prfm_lit,	0xFF000000, 0xD8000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(str_reg,	0x3FE0EC00, 0x38206800)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldr_reg,	0x3FE0EC00, 0x38606800)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldr_lit,	0xBF000000, 0x18000000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldrsw_lit,	0xFF000000, 0x98000000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(exclusive,	0x3F000000, 0x08000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(stp_post,	0x7FC00000, 0x28800000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldp_post,	0x7FC00000, 0x28C00000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(stp_pre,	0x7FC00000, 0x29800000)
@@ -264,19 +269,29 @@ __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ands,	0x7F200000, 0x6A000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(bics,	0x7F200000, 0x6A200000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(b,		0xFC000000, 0x14000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(bl,	0xFC000000, 0x94000000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(b_bl,	0x7C000000, 0x14000000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(cb,	0x7E000000, 0x34000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(cbz,	0x7F000000, 0x34000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(cbnz,	0x7F000000, 0x35000000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(tb,	0x7E000000, 0x36000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(tbz,	0x7F000000, 0x36000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(tbnz,	0x7F000000, 0x37000000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(b_bl_cb_tb, 0x5C000000, 0x14000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(bcond,	0xFF000010, 0x54000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(svc,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4000001)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(hvc,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4000002)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(smc,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4000003)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(brk,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4200000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(exception,	0xFF000000, 0xD4000000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(hint,	0xFFFFF01F, 0xD503201F)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(br,	0xFFFFFC1F, 0xD61F0000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(blr,	0xFFFFFC1F, 0xD63F0000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(br_blr,	0xFFDFFC1F, 0xD61F0000)
 __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ret,	0xFFFFFC1F, 0xD65F0000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(msr_imm,	0xFFF8F01F, 0xD500401F)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(msr_reg,	0xFFF00000, 0xD5100000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(set_clr_daif, 0xFFFFF0DF, 0xD50340DF)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(rd_wr_daif, 0xFFDFFFE0, 0xD51B4220)
 
 #undef	__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS
 
@@ -286,6 +301,9 @@ bool aarch64_insn_is_branch_imm(u32 insn);
 int aarch64_insn_read(void *addr, u32 *insnp);
 int aarch64_insn_write(void *addr, u32 insn);
 enum aarch64_insn_encoding_class aarch64_get_insn_class(u32 insn);
+bool aarch64_insn_uses_literal(u32 insn);
+bool aarch64_insn_is_branch(u32 insn);
+bool aarch64_insn_is_daif_access(u32 insn);
 u64 aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(enum aarch64_insn_imm_type type, u32 insn);
 u32 aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(enum aarch64_insn_imm_type type,
 				  u32 insn, u64 imm);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
index dd9671c..e532188 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
@@ -163,6 +163,34 @@ static bool __kprobes __aarch64_insn_hotpatch_safe(u32 insn)
 		aarch64_insn_is_nop(insn);
 }
 
+bool __kprobes aarch64_insn_uses_literal(u32 insn)
+{
+	/* ldr/ldrsw (literal), prfm */
+
+	return aarch64_insn_is_ldr_lit(insn) ||
+		aarch64_insn_is_ldrsw_lit(insn) ||
+		aarch64_insn_is_adr_adrp(insn) ||
+		aarch64_insn_is_prfm_lit(insn);
+}
+
+bool __kprobes aarch64_insn_is_branch(u32 insn)
+{
+	/* b, bl, cb*, tb*, b.cond, br, blr */
+
+	return aarch64_insn_is_b_bl_cb_tb(insn) ||
+		aarch64_insn_is_br_blr(insn) ||
+		aarch64_insn_is_ret(insn) ||
+		aarch64_insn_is_bcond(insn);
+}
+
+bool __kprobes aarch64_insn_is_daif_access(u32 insn)
+{
+	/* msr daif, mrs daif, msr daifset, msr daifclr */
+
+	return aarch64_insn_is_rd_wr_daif(insn) ||
+		aarch64_insn_is_set_clr_daif(insn);
+}
+
 /*
  * ARM Architecture Reference Manual for ARMv8 Profile-A, Issue A.a
  * Section B2.6.5 "Concurrent modification and execution of instructions":
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v8 3/7] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support
  2015-08-11  0:52 [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c David Long
@ 2015-08-11  0:52 ` David Long
  2015-08-12 13:37   ` Will Deacon
  2015-08-13 11:42   ` Steve Capper
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support David Long
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-11  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>

Add support for basic kernel probes(kprobes) and jump probes
(jprobes) for ARM64.

Kprobes utilizes software breakpoint and single step debug
exceptions supported on ARM v8.

A software breakpoint is placed at the probe address to trap the
kernel execution into the kprobe handler.

ARM v8 supports enabling single stepping before the break exception
return (ERET), with next PC in exception return address (ELR_EL1). The
kprobe handler prepares an executable memory slot for out-of-line
execution with a copy of the original instruction being probed, and
enables single stepping. The PC is set to the out-of-line slot address
before the ERET. With this scheme, the instruction is executed with the
exact same register context except for the PC (and DAIF) registers.

Debug mask (PSTATE.D) is enabled only when single stepping a recursive
kprobe, e.g.: during kprobes reenter so that probed instruction can be
single stepped within the kprobe handler -exception- context.
The recursion depth of kprobe is always 2, i.e. upon probe re-entry,
any further re-entry is prevented by not calling handlers and the case
counted as a missed kprobe).

Single stepping from the x-o-l slot has a drawback for PC-relative accesses
like branching and symbolic literals access as the offset from the new PC
(slot address) may not be ensured to fit in the immediate value of
the opcode. Such instructions need simulation, so reject
probing them.

Instructions generating exceptions or cpu mode change are rejected
for probing.

Instructions using Exclusive Monitor are rejected too.

System instructions are mostly enabled for stepping, except MSR/MRS
accesses to "DAIF" flags in PSTATE, which are not safe for
probing.

Thanks to Steve Capper and Pratyush Anand for several suggested
Changes.

Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig                      |   1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h |   5 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h        |  62 ++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h         |  50 +++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h         |   3 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile              |   1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c      |  35 ++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c       |  68 ++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h       |  28 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c             | 537 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h             |  24 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S         |   1 +
 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                   |  25 ++
 13 files changed, 829 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index ef5d726..1bb07f7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ config ARM64
 	select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
 	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
 	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
+	select HAVE_KPROBES
 	select IRQ_DOMAIN
 	select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
index 40ec68a..92d7cea 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
@@ -90,6 +90,11 @@
 
 #define CACHE_FLUSH_IS_SAFE		1
 
+/* kprobes BRK opcodes with ESR encoding  */
+#define BRK64_ESR_MASK		0xFFFF
+#define BRK64_ESR_KPROBES	0x0004
+#define BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES	(AARCH64_BREAK_MON | (BRK64_ESR_KPROBES << 5))
+
 /* AArch32 */
 #define DBG_ESR_EVT_BKPT	0x4
 #define DBG_ESR_EVT_VECC	0x5
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..af31c4d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _ARM_KPROBES_H
+#define _ARM_KPROBES_H
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+
+#define __ARCH_WANT_KPROBES_INSN_SLOT
+#define MAX_INSN_SIZE			1
+#define MAX_STACK_SIZE			128
+
+#define flush_insn_slot(p)		do { } while (0)
+#define kretprobe_blacklist_size	0
+
+#include <asm/probes.h>
+
+struct prev_kprobe {
+	struct kprobe *kp;
+	unsigned int status;
+};
+
+/* Single step context for kprobe */
+struct kprobe_step_ctx {
+#define KPROBES_STEP_NONE	0x0
+#define KPROBES_STEP_PENDING	0x1
+	unsigned long ss_status;
+	unsigned long match_addr;
+};
+
+/* per-cpu kprobe control block */
+struct kprobe_ctlblk {
+	unsigned int kprobe_status;
+	unsigned long saved_irqflag;
+	struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
+	struct kprobe_step_ctx ss_ctx;
+	struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
+	char jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
+};
+
+void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *);
+int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr);
+int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
+			     unsigned long val, void *data);
+int kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
+int kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
+
+#endif /* _ARM_KPROBES_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7f5a27f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ */
+#ifndef _ARM_PROBES_H
+#define _ARM_PROBES_H
+
+struct kprobe;
+struct arch_specific_insn;
+
+typedef u32 kprobe_opcode_t;
+typedef unsigned long (kprobes_pstate_check_t)(unsigned long);
+typedef unsigned long
+(probes_condition_check_t)(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *);
+typedef void
+(probes_prepare_t)(struct kprobe *, struct arch_specific_insn *);
+typedef void (kprobes_handler_t) (u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *);
+
+enum pc_restore_type {
+	NO_RESTORE,
+	RESTORE_PC,
+};
+
+struct kprobe_pc_restore {
+	enum pc_restore_type type;
+	unsigned long addr;
+};
+
+/* architecture specific copy of original instruction */
+struct arch_specific_insn {
+	kprobe_opcode_t *insn;
+	kprobes_pstate_check_t *pstate_cc;
+	probes_condition_check_t *check_condn;
+	probes_prepare_t *prepare;
+	kprobes_handler_t *handler;
+	/* restore address after step xol */
+	struct kprobe_pc_restore restore;
+};
+
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
index 8f440e9..aadf61a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -206,7 +206,8 @@ static inline int valid_user_regs(struct user_pt_regs *regs)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#define instruction_pointer(regs)	((unsigned long)(regs)->pc)
+#define instruction_pointer(regs)	((regs)->pc)
+#define stack_pointer(regs)		((regs)->sp)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 extern unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
index 426d076..1319872 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_PM)		+= sleep.o suspend.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)		+= cpuidle.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)		+= jump_label.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)		+= kgdb.o
+arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES)		+= kprobes.o kprobes-arm64.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)			+= efi.o efi-stub.o efi-entry.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)			+= pci.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARMV8_DEPRECATED)	+= armv8_deprecated.o
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
index b056369..486ee94 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/kprobes.h>
 #include <linux/stat.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 
@@ -228,6 +229,7 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
 			       struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	siginfo_t info;
+	bool handler_found = false;
 
 	/*
 	 * If we are stepping a pending breakpoint, call the hw_breakpoint
@@ -251,15 +253,21 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
 		 */
 		user_rewind_single_step(current);
 	} else {
+#ifdef	CONFIG_KPROBES
+		if (kprobe_single_step_handler(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
+			handler_found = true;
+#endif
 		if (call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
-			return 0;
-
-		pr_warning("Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1\n");
-		/*
-		 * Re-enable stepping since we know that we will be
-		 * returning to regs.
-		 */
-		set_regs_spsr_ss(regs);
+			handler_found = true;
+
+		if (!handler_found) {
+			pr_warn("Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1\n");
+			/*
+			 * Re-enable stepping since we know that we will be
+			 * returning to regs.
+			 */
+			set_regs_spsr_ss(regs);
+		}
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -315,8 +323,15 @@ static int brk_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
 		};
 
 		force_sig_info(SIGTRAP, &info, current);
-	} else if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
-		pr_warning("Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1\n");
+	}
+#ifdef	CONFIG_KPROBES
+	else if ((esr & BRK64_ESR_MASK) == BRK64_ESR_KPROBES) {
+		if (kprobe_breakpoint_handler(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
+			return -EFAULT;
+	}
+#endif
+	else if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
+		pr_warn("Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1\n");
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f958c52
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/kprobes.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <asm/kprobes.h>
+#include <asm/insn.h>
+
+#include "kprobes-arm64.h"
+
+static bool __kprobes aarch64_insn_is_steppable(u32 insn)
+{
+	if (aarch64_get_insn_class(insn) == AARCH64_INSN_CLS_BR_SYS) {
+		if (aarch64_insn_is_branch(insn))
+			return false;
+
+		/* modification of daif creates issues */
+		if (aarch64_insn_is_daif_access(insn))
+			return false;
+
+		if (aarch64_insn_is_exception(insn))
+			return false;
+
+		if (aarch64_insn_is_hint(insn))
+			return aarch64_insn_is_nop(insn);
+
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	if (aarch64_insn_uses_literal(insn))
+		return false;
+
+	if (aarch64_insn_is_exclusive(insn))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+/* Return:
+ *   INSN_REJECTED     If instruction is one not allowed to kprobe,
+ *   INSN_GOOD         If instruction is supported and uses instruction slot,
+ *   INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT If instruction is supported but doesn't use its slot.
+ */
+enum kprobe_insn __kprobes
+arm_kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Instructions reading or modifying the PC won't work from the XOL
+	 * slot.
+	 */
+	if (aarch64_insn_is_steppable(insn))
+		return INSN_GOOD;
+	else
+		return INSN_REJECTED;
+}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..87e7891
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_ARM64_H
+#define _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_ARM64_H
+
+enum kprobe_insn {
+	INSN_REJECTED,
+	INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT,
+	INSN_GOOD,
+};
+
+enum kprobe_insn __kprobes
+arm_kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi);
+
+#endif /* _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_ARM64_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..601d2c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -0,0 +1,537 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
+ *
+ * Kprobes support for ARM64
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
+ * Author: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ */
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/kprobes.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
+#include <linux/stringify.h>
+#include <asm/traps.h>
+#include <asm/ptrace.h>
+#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
+#include <asm/system_misc.h>
+#include <asm/insn.h>
+
+#include "kprobes.h"
+#include "kprobes-arm64.h"
+
+#define MIN_STACK_SIZE(addr)	min((unsigned long)MAX_STACK_SIZE,	\
+	(unsigned long)current_thread_info() + THREAD_START_SP - (addr))
+
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
+
+static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	/* prepare insn slot */
+	p->ainsn.insn[0] = p->opcode;
+
+	flush_icache_range((uintptr_t) (p->ainsn.insn),
+			   (uintptr_t) (p->ainsn.insn) + MAX_INSN_SIZE);
+
+	/*
+	 * Needs restoring of return address after stepping xol.
+	 */
+	p->ainsn.restore.addr = (unsigned long) p->addr +
+	  sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
+	p->ainsn.restore.type = RESTORE_PC;
+}
+
+int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	kprobe_opcode_t insn;
+	unsigned long probe_addr = (unsigned long)p->addr;
+
+	/* copy instruction */
+	insn = *p->addr;
+	p->opcode = insn;
+
+	if (in_exception_text(probe_addr))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* decode instruction */
+	switch (arm_kprobe_decode_insn(insn, &p->ainsn)) {
+	case INSN_REJECTED:	/* insn not supported */
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	case INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT:	/* insn need simulation */
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	case INSN_GOOD:	/* instruction uses slot */
+		p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
+		if (!p->ainsn.insn)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		break;
+	};
+
+	/* prepare the instruction */
+	arch_prepare_ss_slot(p);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __kprobes patch_text(kprobe_opcode_t *addr, u32 opcode)
+{
+	void *addrs[1];
+	u32 insns[1];
+
+	addrs[0] = (void *)addr;
+	insns[0] = (u32)opcode;
+
+	return aarch64_insn_patch_text_sync(addrs, insns, 1);
+}
+
+/* arm kprobe: install breakpoint in text */
+void __kprobes arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	patch_text(p->addr, BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES);
+}
+
+/* disarm kprobe: remove breakpoint from text */
+void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	patch_text(p->addr, p->opcode);
+}
+
+void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	if (p->ainsn.insn) {
+		free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.insn, 0);
+		p->ainsn.insn = NULL;
+	}
+}
+
+static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
+{
+	kcb->prev_kprobe.kp = kprobe_running();
+	kcb->prev_kprobe.status = kcb->kprobe_status;
+}
+
+static void __kprobes restore_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
+{
+	__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, kcb->prev_kprobe.kp);
+	kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe.status;
+}
+
+static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The D-flag (Debug mask) is set (masked) upon exception entry.
+ * Kprobes needs to clear (unmask) D-flag -ONLY- in case of recursive
+ * probe i.e. when probe hit from kprobe handler context upon
+ * executing the pre/post handlers. In this case we return with
+ * D-flag clear so that single-stepping can be carried-out.
+ *
+ * Leave D-flag set in all other cases.
+ */
+static void __kprobes
+spsr_set_debug_flag(struct pt_regs *regs, int mask)
+{
+	unsigned long spsr = regs->pstate;
+
+	if (mask)
+		spsr |= PSR_D_BIT;
+	else
+		spsr &= ~PSR_D_BIT;
+
+	regs->pstate = spsr;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Interrupts need to be disabled before single-step mode is set, and not
+ * reenabled until after single-step mode ends.
+ * Without disabling interrupt on local CPU, there is a chance of
+ * interrupt occurrence in the period of exception return and  start of
+ * out-of-line single-step, that result in wrongly single stepping
+ * the interrupt handler.
+ */
+static void __kprobes kprobes_save_local_irqflag(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+
+	kcb->saved_irqflag = regs->pstate;
+	regs->pstate |= PSR_I_BIT;
+}
+
+static void __kprobes kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+
+	if (kcb->saved_irqflag & PSR_I_BIT)
+		regs->pstate |= PSR_I_BIT;
+	else
+		regs->pstate &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
+}
+
+static void __kprobes
+set_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	kcb->ss_ctx.ss_status = KPROBES_STEP_PENDING;
+	kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = addr + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
+}
+
+static void __kprobes clear_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
+{
+	kcb->ss_ctx.ss_status = KPROBES_STEP_NONE;
+	kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = 0;
+}
+
+static void __kprobes
+skip_singlestep_missed(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	/* set return addr to next pc to continue */
+	instruction_pointer(regs) += sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
+}
+
+static void __kprobes setup_singlestep(struct kprobe *p,
+				       struct pt_regs *regs,
+				       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, int reenter)
+{
+	unsigned long slot;
+
+	if (reenter) {
+		save_previous_kprobe(kcb);
+		set_current_kprobe(p);
+		kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_REENTER;
+	} else {
+		kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
+	}
+
+	if (p->ainsn.insn) {
+		/* prepare for single stepping */
+		slot = (unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn;
+
+		set_ss_context(kcb, slot);	/* mark pending ss */
+
+		if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
+			spsr_set_debug_flag(regs, 0);
+
+		/* IRQs and single stepping do not mix well. */
+		kprobes_save_local_irqflag(regs);
+		kernel_enable_single_step(regs);
+		instruction_pointer(regs) = slot;
+	} else	{
+		BUG();
+	}
+}
+
+static int __kprobes reenter_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
+				    struct pt_regs *regs,
+				    struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
+{
+	switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
+	case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
+	case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
+		if (!p->ainsn.check_condn || p->ainsn.check_condn(p, regs)) {
+			kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
+			setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 1);
+		} else	{
+			/* condition check failed, skip stepping */
+			skip_singlestep_missed(kcb, regs);
+		}
+		break;
+	case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
+	case KPROBE_REENTER:
+		pr_warn("Unrecoverable kprobe detected at %p.\n", p->addr);
+		dump_kprobe(p);
+		BUG();
+		break;
+	default:
+		WARN_ON(1);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static void __kprobes
+post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
+
+	if (!cur)
+		return;
+
+	/* return addr restore if non-branching insn */
+	if (cur->ainsn.restore.type == RESTORE_PC) {
+		instruction_pointer(regs) = cur->ainsn.restore.addr;
+		if (!instruction_pointer(regs))
+			BUG();
+	}
+
+	/* restore back original saved kprobe variables and continue */
+	if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER) {
+		restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
+		return;
+	}
+	/* call post handler */
+	kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE;
+	if (cur->post_handler)	{
+		/* post_handler can hit breakpoint and single step
+		 * again, so we enable D-flag for recursive exception.
+		 */
+		cur->post_handler(cur, regs, 0);
+	}
+
+	reset_current_kprobe();
+}
+
+int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr)
+{
+	struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+
+	switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
+	case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
+	case KPROBE_REENTER:
+		/*
+		 * We are here because the instruction being single
+		 * stepped caused a page fault. We reset the current
+		 * kprobe and the ip points back to the probe address
+		 * and allow the page fault handler to continue as a
+		 * normal page fault.
+		 */
+		instruction_pointer(regs) = (unsigned long)cur->addr;
+		if (!instruction_pointer(regs))
+			BUG();
+		if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
+			restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
+		else
+			reset_current_kprobe();
+
+		break;
+	case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
+	case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
+		/*
+		 * We increment the nmissed count for accounting,
+		 * we can also use npre/npostfault count for accounting
+		 * these specific fault cases.
+		 */
+		kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(cur);
+
+		/*
+		 * We come here because instructions in the pre/post
+		 * handler caused the page_fault, this could happen
+		 * if handler tries to access user space by
+		 * copy_from_user(), get_user() etc. Let the
+		 * user-specified handler try to fix it first.
+		 */
+		if (cur->fault_handler && cur->fault_handler(cur, regs, fsr))
+			return 1;
+
+		/*
+		 * In case the user-specified fault handler returned
+		 * zero, try to fix up.
+		 */
+		if (fixup_exception(regs))
+			return 1;
+
+		break;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
+				       unsigned long val, void *data)
+{
+	return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}
+
+void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct kprobe *p, *cur;
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
+	unsigned long addr = instruction_pointer(regs);
+
+	kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+	cur = kprobe_running();
+
+	p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *) addr);
+
+	if (p) {
+		if (cur) {
+			if (reenter_kprobe(p, regs, kcb))
+				return;
+		} else if (!p->ainsn.check_condn ||
+			   p->ainsn.check_condn(p, regs)) {
+			/* Probe hit and conditional execution check ok. */
+			set_current_kprobe(p);
+			kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
+
+			/*
+			 * If we have no pre-handler or it returned 0, we
+			 * continue with normal processing.  If we have a
+			 * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it prepped
+			 * for calling the break_handler below on re-entry,
+			 * so get out doing nothing more here.
+			 *
+			 * pre_handler can hit a breakpoint and can step thru
+			 * before return, keep PSTATE D-flag enabled until
+			 * pre_handler return back.
+			 */
+			if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs)) {
+				kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
+				setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
+				return;
+			}
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Breakpoint hit but conditional check failed,
+			 * so just skip the instruction (NOP behaviour)
+			 */
+			skip_singlestep_missed(kcb, regs);
+			return;
+		}
+	} else if (*(kprobe_opcode_t *) addr != BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES) {
+		/*
+		 * The breakpoint instruction was removed right
+		 * after we hit it.  Another cpu has removed
+		 * either a probepoint or a debugger breakpoint
+		 * at this address.  In either case, no further
+		 * handling of this interrupt is appropriate.
+		 * Return back to original instruction, and continue.
+		 */
+		return;
+	} else if (cur) {
+		/* We probably hit a jprobe.  Call its break handler. */
+		if (cur->break_handler && cur->break_handler(cur, regs)) {
+			kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
+			setup_singlestep(cur, regs, kcb, 0);
+			return;
+		}
+	} else {
+		/* breakpoint is removed, now in a race
+		 * Return back to original instruction & continue.
+		 */
+	}
+}
+
+static int __kprobes
+kprobe_ss_hit(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	if ((kcb->ss_ctx.ss_status == KPROBES_STEP_PENDING)
+	    && (kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr == addr)) {
+		clear_ss_context(kcb);	/* clear pending ss */
+		return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
+	}
+	/* not ours, kprobes should ignore it */
+	return DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
+}
+
+int __kprobes
+kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
+{
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+	int retval;
+
+	/* return error if this is not our step */
+	retval = kprobe_ss_hit(kcb, instruction_pointer(regs));
+
+	if (retval == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
+		kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(regs);
+		kernel_disable_single_step();
+
+		if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
+			spsr_set_debug_flag(regs, 1);
+
+		post_kprobe_handler(kcb, regs);
+	}
+
+	return retval;
+}
+
+int __kprobes
+kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
+{
+	kprobe_handler(regs);
+	return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
+}
+
+int __kprobes setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+	long stack_ptr = stack_pointer(regs);
+
+	kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs;
+	memcpy(kcb->jprobes_stack, (void *)stack_ptr,
+	       MIN_STACK_SIZE(stack_ptr));
+
+	instruction_pointer(regs) = (long)jp->entry;
+	preempt_disable();
+	return 1;
+}
+
+void __kprobes jprobe_return(void)
+{
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+
+	/*
+	 * Jprobe handler return by entering break exception,
+	 * encoded same as kprobe, but with following conditions
+	 * -a magic number in x0 to identify from rest of other kprobes.
+	 * -restore stack addr to original saved pt_regs
+	 */
+	asm volatile ("ldr x0, [%0]\n\t"
+		      "mov sp, x0\n\t"
+		      "ldr x0, =" __stringify(JPROBES_MAGIC_NUM) "\n\t"
+		      "BRK %1\n\t"
+		      "NOP\n\t"
+		      :
+		      : "r"(&kcb->jprobe_saved_regs.sp),
+		      "I"(BRK64_ESR_KPROBES)
+		      : "memory");
+}
+
+int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+	long stack_addr = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs.sp;
+	long orig_sp = stack_pointer(regs);
+	struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
+
+	if (regs->regs[0] == JPROBES_MAGIC_NUM) {
+		if (orig_sp != stack_addr) {
+			struct pt_regs *saved_regs =
+			    (struct pt_regs *)kcb->jprobe_saved_regs.sp;
+			pr_err("current sp %lx does not match saved sp %lx\n",
+			       orig_sp, stack_addr);
+			pr_err("Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
+			show_regs(saved_regs);
+			pr_err("Current registers\n");
+			show_regs(regs);
+			BUG();
+		}
+		*regs = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
+		memcpy((void *)stack_addr, kcb->jprobes_stack,
+		       MIN_STACK_SIZE(stack_addr));
+		preempt_enable_no_resched();
+		return 1;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int __init arch_init_kprobes(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e98ad60
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_H
+#define _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_H
+
+#define JPROBES_MAGIC_NUM	0xa5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5
+
+/* Move this out to appropriate header file */
+int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs);
+
+#endif /* _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 9807333..1fa6adc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ SECTIONS
 			TEXT_TEXT
 			SCHED_TEXT
 			LOCK_TEXT
+			KPROBES_TEXT
 			HYPERVISOR_TEXT
 			IDMAP_TEXT
 			*(.fixup)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 94d98cd..01bf525 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -39,6 +39,28 @@
 
 static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
+static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	/* kprobe_running() needs smp_processor_id() */
+	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
+		preempt_disable();
+		if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, esr))
+			ret = 1;
+		preempt_enable();
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+#else
+static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Dump out the page tables associated with 'addr' in mm 'mm'.
  */
@@ -199,6 +221,9 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
 	unsigned long vm_flags = VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC;
 	unsigned int mm_flags = FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE;
 
+	if (notify_page_fault(regs, esr))
+		return 0;
+
 	tsk = current;
 	mm  = tsk->mm;
 
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v8 4/7] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support
  2015-08-11  0:52 [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
@ 2015-08-11  0:52 ` David Long
  2015-08-12 14:29   ` Will Deacon
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] arm64: Add trampoline code for kretprobes David Long
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-11  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>

Kprobes needs simulation of instructions that cannot be stepped
from different memory location, e.g.: those instructions
that uses PC-relative addressing. In simulation, the behaviour
of the instruction is implemented using a copy of pt_regs.

Following instruction catagories are simulated:
 - All branching instructions(conditional, register, and immediate)
 - Literal access instructions(load-literal, adr/adrp)

Conditional execution is limited to branching instructions in
ARM v8. If conditions at PSTATE do not match the condition fields
of opcode, the instruction is effectively NOP. Kprobes considers
this case as 'miss'.

Thanks to Will Cohen for assorted suggested changes.

Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile               |   4 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c        |  98 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h        |   2 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c              |  35 ++++++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c   | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.h |  32 ++++++
 7 files changed, 459 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.h

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
index 1319872..5e9d54f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
@@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_PM)		+= sleep.o suspend.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)		+= cpuidle.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)		+= jump_label.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)		+= kgdb.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES)		+= kprobes.o kprobes-arm64.o
+arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES)		+= kprobes.o kprobes-arm64.o		\
+					   probes-simulate-insn.o		\
+					   probes-condn-check.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)			+= efi.o efi-stub.o efi-entry.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)			+= pci.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARMV8_DEPRECATED)	+= armv8_deprecated.o
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
index f958c52..8a7e6b0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
@@ -20,6 +20,76 @@
 #include <asm/insn.h>
 
 #include "kprobes-arm64.h"
+#include "probes-simulate-insn.h"
+
+/*
+ * condition check functions for kprobes simulation
+ */
+static unsigned long __kprobes
+__check_pstate(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct arch_specific_insn *asi = &p->ainsn;
+	unsigned long pstate = regs->pstate & 0xffffffff;
+
+	return asi->pstate_cc(pstate);
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes
+__check_cbz(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	return check_cbz((u32)p->opcode, regs);
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes
+__check_cbnz(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	return check_cbnz((u32)p->opcode, regs);
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes
+__check_tbz(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	return check_tbz((u32)p->opcode, regs);
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes
+__check_tbnz(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	return check_tbnz((u32)p->opcode, regs);
+}
+
+/*
+ * prepare functions for instruction simulation
+ */
+static void __kprobes
+prepare_none(struct kprobe *p, struct arch_specific_insn *asi)
+{
+}
+
+static void __kprobes
+prepare_bcond(struct kprobe *p, struct arch_specific_insn *asi)
+{
+	kprobe_opcode_t insn = p->opcode;
+
+	asi->check_condn = __check_pstate;
+	asi->pstate_cc = kprobe_condition_checks[insn & 0xf];
+}
+
+static void __kprobes
+prepare_cbz_cbnz(struct kprobe *p, struct arch_specific_insn *asi)
+{
+	kprobe_opcode_t insn = p->opcode;
+
+	asi->check_condn = (insn & (1 << 24)) ? __check_cbnz : __check_cbz;
+}
+
+static void __kprobes
+prepare_tbz_tbnz(struct kprobe *p, struct arch_specific_insn *asi)
+{
+	kprobe_opcode_t insn = p->opcode;
+
+	asi->check_condn = (insn & (1 << 24)) ? __check_tbnz : __check_tbz;
+}
 
 static bool __kprobes aarch64_insn_is_steppable(u32 insn)
 {
@@ -63,6 +133,34 @@ arm_kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi)
 	 */
 	if (aarch64_insn_is_steppable(insn))
 		return INSN_GOOD;
+
+	asi->prepare = prepare_none;
+
+	if (aarch64_insn_is_bcond(insn)) {
+		asi->prepare = prepare_bcond;
+		asi->handler = simulate_b_cond;
+	} else if (aarch64_insn_is_cb(insn)) {
+		asi->prepare = prepare_cbz_cbnz;
+		asi->handler = simulate_cbz_cbnz;
+	} else if (aarch64_insn_is_tb(insn)) {
+		asi->prepare = prepare_tbz_tbnz;
+		asi->handler = simulate_tbz_tbnz;
+	} else if (aarch64_insn_is_adr_adrp(insn))
+		asi->handler = simulate_adr_adrp;
+	else if (aarch64_insn_is_b_bl(insn))
+		asi->handler = simulate_b_bl;
+	else if (aarch64_insn_is_br_blr(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_ret(insn))
+		asi->handler = simulate_br_blr_ret;
+	else if (aarch64_insn_is_ldr_lit(insn))
+		asi->handler = simulate_ldr_literal;
+	else if (aarch64_insn_is_ldrsw_lit(insn))
+		asi->handler = simulate_ldrsw_literal;
 	else
+		/*
+		 * Instruction cannot be stepped out-of-line and we don't
+		 * (yet) simulate it.
+		 */
 		return INSN_REJECTED;
+
+	return INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
index 87e7891..ff8a55f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ enum kprobe_insn {
 	INSN_GOOD,
 };
 
+extern kprobes_pstate_check_t * const kprobe_condition_checks[16];
+
 enum kprobe_insn __kprobes
 arm_kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
index 601d2c6..6255814 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
 
+static void __kprobes
+post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe_ctlblk *, struct pt_regs *);
+
 static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
 {
 	/* prepare insn slot */
@@ -54,6 +57,27 @@ static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
 	p->ainsn.restore.type = RESTORE_PC;
 }
 
+static void __kprobes arch_prepare_simulate(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	if (p->ainsn.prepare)
+		p->ainsn.prepare(p, &p->ainsn);
+
+	/* This instructions is not executed xol. No need to adjust the PC */
+	p->ainsn.restore.addr = 0;
+	p->ainsn.restore.type = NO_RESTORE;
+}
+
+static void __kprobes arch_simulate_insn(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+
+	if (p->ainsn.handler)
+		p->ainsn.handler((u32)p->opcode, (long)p->addr, regs);
+
+	/* single step simulated, now go for post processing */
+	post_kprobe_handler(kcb, regs);
+}
+
 int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
 	kprobe_opcode_t insn;
@@ -72,7 +96,8 @@ int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	case INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT:	/* insn need simulation */
-		return -EINVAL;
+		p->ainsn.insn = NULL;
+		break;
 
 	case INSN_GOOD:	/* instruction uses slot */
 		p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
@@ -82,7 +107,10 @@ int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 	};
 
 	/* prepare the instruction */
-	arch_prepare_ss_slot(p);
+	if (p->ainsn.insn)
+		arch_prepare_ss_slot(p);
+	else
+		arch_prepare_simulate(p);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -231,7 +259,8 @@ static void __kprobes setup_singlestep(struct kprobe *p,
 		kernel_enable_single_step(regs);
 		instruction_pointer(regs) = slot;
 	} else	{
-		BUG();
+		/* insn simulation */
+		arch_simulate_insn(p, regs);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e68aa0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited
+ *
+ * Copied from: arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-common.c
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * Description:
+ *
+ *  AArch64 and AArch32 shares same conditional(CNZV) flags encoding.
+ *  This file implements conditional check helpers compatible with
+ *  both AArch64 and AArch32 modes. Uprobes on v8 can handle both 32-bit
+ *  & 64-bit user-space instructions, so we abstract the common functions
+ *  in this file. While AArch64 and AArch32 specific instruction handling
+ *  are implemented in separate files, this file contains common bits.
+ */
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <asm/probes.h>
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_eq(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return pstate & PSR_Z_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_ne(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (~pstate) & PSR_Z_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_cs(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return pstate & PSR_C_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_cc(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (~pstate) & PSR_C_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_mi(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return pstate & PSR_N_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_pl(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (~pstate) & PSR_N_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_vs(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return pstate & PSR_V_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_vc(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (~pstate) & PSR_V_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_hi(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);	/* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
+	return pstate & PSR_C_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_ls(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);	/* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
+	return (~pstate) & PSR_C_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_ge(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	pstate ^= (pstate << 3);	/* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
+	return (~pstate) & PSR_N_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_lt(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	pstate ^= (pstate << 3);	/* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
+	return pstate & PSR_N_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_gt(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	/*PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
+	unsigned long temp = pstate ^ (pstate << 3);
+
+	temp |= (pstate << 1);	/*PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
+	return (~temp) & PSR_N_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_le(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	/*PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
+	unsigned long temp = pstate ^ (pstate << 3);
+
+	temp |= (pstate << 1);	/*PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
+	return temp & PSR_N_BIT;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __kprobes __check_al(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
+kprobes_pstate_check_t * const kprobe_condition_checks[16] = {
+	&__check_eq, &__check_ne, &__check_cs, &__check_cc,
+	&__check_mi, &__check_pl, &__check_vs, &__check_vc,
+	&__check_hi, &__check_ls, &__check_ge, &__check_lt,
+	&__check_gt, &__check_le, &__check_al, &__check_al
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b7d6ab7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.c
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.c
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/kprobes.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+
+#include "probes-simulate-insn.h"
+
+#define sign_extend(x, signbit)		\
+	((x) | (0 - ((x) & (1 << (signbit)))))
+
+#define bbl_displacement(insn)		\
+	sign_extend(((insn) & 0x3ffffff) << 2, 27)
+
+#define bcond_displacement(insn)	\
+	sign_extend(((insn >> 5) & 0x7ffff) << 2, 21)
+
+#define cbz_displacement(insn)	\
+	sign_extend(((insn >> 5) & 0x7ffff) << 2, 21)
+
+#define tbz_displacement(insn)	\
+	sign_extend(((insn >> 5) & 0x3fff) << 2, 15)
+
+#define ldr_displacement(insn)	\
+	sign_extend(((insn >> 5) & 0x7ffff) << 2, 21)
+
+
+unsigned long __kprobes check_cbz(u32 opcode, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int xn = opcode & 0x1f;
+
+	return (opcode & (1 << 31)) ?
+	    !(regs->regs[xn]) : !(regs->regs[xn] & 0xffffffff);
+}
+
+unsigned long __kprobes check_cbnz(u32 opcode, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int xn = opcode & 0x1f;
+
+	return (opcode & (1 << 31)) ?
+	    (regs->regs[xn]) : (regs->regs[xn] & 0xffffffff);
+}
+
+unsigned long __kprobes check_tbz(u32 opcode, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int xn = opcode & 0x1f;
+	int bit_pos = ((opcode & (1 << 31)) >> 26) | ((opcode >> 19) & 0x1f);
+
+	return ~((regs->regs[xn] >> bit_pos) & 0x1);
+}
+
+unsigned long __kprobes check_tbnz(u32 opcode, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int xn = opcode & 0x1f;
+	int bit_pos = ((opcode & (1 << 31)) >> 26) | ((opcode >> 19) & 0x1f);
+
+	return (regs->regs[xn] >> bit_pos) & 0x1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * instruction simulation functions
+ */
+void __kprobes
+simulate_adr_adrp(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	long imm, xn, val;
+
+	xn = opcode & 0x1f;
+	imm = ((opcode >> 3) & 0x1ffffc) | ((opcode >> 29) & 0x3);
+	imm = sign_extend(imm, 20);
+	if (opcode & 0x80000000)
+		val = (imm<<12) + (addr & 0xfffffffffffff000);
+	else
+		val = imm + addr;
+
+	regs->regs[xn] = val;
+
+	instruction_pointer(regs) += 4;
+}
+
+void __kprobes
+simulate_b_bl(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int disp = bbl_displacement(opcode);
+
+	/* Link register is x30 */
+	if (opcode & (1 << 31))
+		regs->regs[30] = addr + 4;
+
+	instruction_pointer(regs) = addr + disp;
+}
+
+void __kprobes
+simulate_b_cond(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int disp = bcond_displacement(opcode);
+
+	instruction_pointer(regs) = addr + disp;
+}
+
+void __kprobes
+simulate_br_blr_ret(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int xn = (opcode >> 5) & 0x1f;
+
+	/* Link register is x30 */
+	if (((opcode >> 21) & 0x3) == 1)
+		regs->regs[30] = addr + 4;
+
+	instruction_pointer(regs) = regs->regs[xn];
+}
+
+void __kprobes
+simulate_cbz_cbnz(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int disp = cbz_displacement(opcode);
+
+	instruction_pointer(regs) = addr + disp;
+}
+
+void __kprobes
+simulate_tbz_tbnz(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int disp = tbz_displacement(opcode);
+
+	instruction_pointer(regs) = addr + disp;
+}
+
+void __kprobes
+simulate_ldr_literal(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	u64 *load_addr;
+	int xn = opcode & 0x1f;
+	int disp = ldr_displacement(opcode);
+
+	load_addr = (u64 *) (addr + disp);
+
+	if (opcode & (1 << 30))	/* x0-x31 */
+		regs->regs[xn] = *load_addr;
+	else			/* w0-w31 */
+		*(u32 *) (&regs->regs[xn]) = (*(u32 *) (load_addr));
+
+	instruction_pointer(regs) += 4;
+}
+
+void __kprobes
+simulate_ldrsw_literal(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	s32 *load_addr;
+	int xn = opcode & 0x1f;
+	int disp = ldr_displacement(opcode);
+
+	load_addr = (s32 *) (addr + disp);
+	regs->regs[xn] = *load_addr;
+
+	instruction_pointer(regs) += 4;
+}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0d8873f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.h
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm64/kernel/probes-simulate-insn.h
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _ARM_KERNEL_PROBES_SIMULATE_INSN_H
+#define _ARM_KERNEL_PROBES_SIMULATE_INSN_H
+
+unsigned long check_cbz(u32 opcode, struct pt_regs *regs);
+unsigned long check_cbnz(u32 opcode, struct pt_regs *regs);
+unsigned long check_tbz(u32 opcode, struct pt_regs *regs);
+unsigned long check_tbnz(u32 opcode, struct pt_regs *regs);
+void simulate_adr_adrp(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs);
+void simulate_b_bl(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs);
+void simulate_b_cond(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs);
+void simulate_br_blr_ret(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs);
+void simulate_cbz_cbnz(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs);
+void simulate_tbz_tbnz(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs);
+void simulate_ldr_literal(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs);
+void simulate_ldrsw_literal(u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *regs);
+
+#endif /* _ARM_KERNEL_PROBES_SIMULATE_INSN_H */
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v8 5/7] arm64: Add trampoline code for kretprobes
  2015-08-11  0:52 [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support David Long
@ 2015-08-11  0:52 ` David Long
  2015-08-12 14:47   ` Will Deacon
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes) David Long
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-11  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

From: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>

The trampoline code is used by kretprobes to capture a return from a probed
function.  This is done by saving the registers, calling the handler, and
restoring the registers.  The code then returns to the original saved caller
return address.  It is necessary to do this directly instead of using a
software breakpoint because the code used in processing that breakpoint
could itself be kprobe'd and cause a problematic reentry into the debug
exception handler.

Signed-off-by: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h       |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile             |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c        | 22 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c            |  5 +++
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes_trampoline.S | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 91 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes_trampoline.S

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
index af31c4d..83399aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -58,5 +58,7 @@ int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
 			     unsigned long val, void *data);
 int kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
 int kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
+void kretprobe_trampoline(void);
+void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
 
 #endif /* _ARM_KPROBES_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
index 5e9d54f..75d5fb0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)		+= cpuidle.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)		+= jump_label.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)		+= kgdb.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES)		+= kprobes.o kprobes-arm64.o		\
+					   kprobes_trampoline.o			\
 					   probes-simulate-insn.o		\
 					   probes-condn-check.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)			+= efi.o efi-stub.o efi-entry.o
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index c99701a..475c93b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -49,6 +49,28 @@ int main(void)
   DEFINE(S_X5,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[5]));
   DEFINE(S_X6,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[6]));
   DEFINE(S_X7,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[7]));
+  DEFINE(S_X8,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[8]));
+  DEFINE(S_X9,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[9]));
+  DEFINE(S_X10,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[10]));
+  DEFINE(S_X11,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[11]));
+  DEFINE(S_X12,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[12]));
+  DEFINE(S_X13,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[13]));
+  DEFINE(S_X14,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[14]));
+  DEFINE(S_X15,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[15]));
+  DEFINE(S_X16,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[16]));
+  DEFINE(S_X17,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[17]));
+  DEFINE(S_X18,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[18]));
+  DEFINE(S_X19,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[19]));
+  DEFINE(S_X20,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[20]));
+  DEFINE(S_X21,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[21]));
+  DEFINE(S_X22,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[22]));
+  DEFINE(S_X23,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[23]));
+  DEFINE(S_X24,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[24]));
+  DEFINE(S_X25,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[25]));
+  DEFINE(S_X26,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[26]));
+  DEFINE(S_X27,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[27]));
+  DEFINE(S_X28,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[28]));
+  DEFINE(S_X29,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[29]));
   DEFINE(S_LR,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[30]));
   DEFINE(S_SP,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, sp));
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
index 6255814..98db85c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -560,6 +560,11 @@ int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	return (void *) 0;
+}
+
 int __init arch_init_kprobes(void)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes_trampoline.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes_trampoline.S
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd0172b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes_trampoline.S
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/*
+ * trampoline entry and return code for kretprobes.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/linkage.h>
+#include <generated/asm-offsets.h>
+
+	.text
+
+ENTRY(kretprobe_trampoline)
+
+	sub sp, sp, #S_FRAME_SIZE
+
+	stp x0, x1, [sp, #S_X0]
+	stp x2, x3, [sp, #S_X2]
+	stp x4, x5, [sp, #S_X4]
+	stp x6, x7, [sp, #S_X6]
+	stp x8, x9, [sp, #S_X8]
+	stp x10, x11, [sp, #S_X10]
+	stp x12, x13, [sp, #S_X12]
+	stp x14, x15, [sp, #S_X14]
+	stp x16, x17, [sp, #S_X16]
+	stp x18, x19, [sp, #S_X18]
+	stp x20, x21, [sp, #S_X20]
+	stp x22, x23, [sp, #S_X22]
+	stp x24, x25, [sp, #S_X24]
+	stp x26, x27, [sp, #S_X26]
+	stp x28, x29, [sp, #S_X28]
+	str x30, [sp, #S_LR]
+	mrs x0, nzcv
+	str x0, [sp, #S_PSTATE]
+
+	mov x0, sp
+	bl trampoline_probe_handler
+	/* Replace trampoline address in lr with actual
+	   orig_ret_addr return address. */
+	str x0, [sp, #S_LR]
+
+	ldr x0, [sp, #S_PSTATE]
+	msr nzcv, x0
+	ldp x0, x1, [sp, #S_X0]
+	ldp x2, x3, [sp, #S_X2]
+	ldp x4, x5, [sp, #S_X4]
+	ldp x6, x7, [sp, #S_X6]
+	ldp x8, x9, [sp, #S_X8]
+	ldp x10, x11, [sp, #S_X10]
+	ldp x12, x13, [sp, #S_X12]
+	ldp x14, x15, [sp, #S_X14]
+	ldp x16, x17, [sp, #S_X16]
+	ldp x18, x19, [sp, #S_X18]
+	ldp x20, x21, [sp, #S_X20]
+	ldp x22, x23, [sp, #S_X22]
+	ldp x24, x25, [sp, #S_X24]
+	ldp x26, x27, [sp, #S_X26]
+	ldp x28, x29, [sp, #S_X28]
+	ldr x30, [sp, #S_LR]
+
+	add sp, sp, #S_FRAME_SIZE
+	ret
+
+ENDPROC(kretprobe_trampoline)
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v8 6/7] arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes)
  2015-08-11  0:52 [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] arm64: Add trampoline code for kretprobes David Long
@ 2015-08-11  0:52 ` David Long
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module David Long
  2015-08-11 16:56 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support Will Deacon
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-11  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>

The pre-handler of this special 'trampoline' kprobe executes the return
probe handler functions and restores original return address in ELR_EL1.
This way the saved pt_regs still hold the original register context to be
carried back to the probed kernel function.

Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig          |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 1bb07f7..9a589a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ config ARM64
 	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
 	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
 	select HAVE_KPROBES
+	select HAVE_KRETPROBES if HAVE_KPROBES
 	select IRQ_DOMAIN
 	select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
index 98db85c..1dadad8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -562,7 +562,80 @@ int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	return (void *) 0;
+	struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL;
+	struct hlist_head *head, empty_rp;
+	struct hlist_node *tmp;
+	unsigned long flags, orig_ret_addr = 0;
+	unsigned long trampoline_address =
+		(unsigned long)&kretprobe_trampoline;
+
+	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&empty_rp);
+	kretprobe_hash_lock(current, &head, &flags);
+
+	/*
+	 * It is possible to have multiple instances associated with a given
+	 * task either because multiple functions in the call path have
+	 * a return probe installed on them, and/or more than one return
+	 * probe was registered for a target function.
+	 *
+	 * We can handle this because:
+	 *     - instances are always inserted at the head of the list
+	 *     - when multiple return probes are registered for the same
+	 *       function, the first instance's ret_addr will point to the
+	 *       real return address, and all the rest will point to
+	 *       kretprobe_trampoline
+	 */
+	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ri, tmp, head, hlist) {
+		if (ri->task != current)
+			/* another task is sharing our hash bucket */
+			continue;
+
+		if (ri->rp && ri->rp->handler) {
+			__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, &ri->rp->kp);
+			get_kprobe_ctlblk()->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
+			ri->rp->handler(ri, regs);
+			__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
+		}
+
+		orig_ret_addr = (unsigned long)ri->ret_addr;
+		recycle_rp_inst(ri, &empty_rp);
+
+		if (orig_ret_addr != trampoline_address)
+			/*
+			 * This is the real return address. Any other
+			 * instances associated with this task are for
+			 * other calls deeper on the call stack
+			 */
+			break;
+	}
+
+	kretprobe_assert(ri, orig_ret_addr, trampoline_address);
+	/* restore the original return address */
+	instruction_pointer(regs) = orig_ret_addr;
+	reset_current_kprobe();
+	kretprobe_hash_unlock(current, &flags);
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ri, tmp, &empty_rp, hlist) {
+		hlist_del(&ri->hlist);
+		kfree(ri);
+	}
+
+	/* return 1 so that post handlers not called */
+	return (void *) orig_ret_addr;
+}
+
+void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
+				      struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->regs[30];
+
+	/* replace return addr (x30) with trampoline */
+	regs->regs[30] = (long)&kretprobe_trampoline;
+}
+
+int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	return 0;
 }
 
 int __init arch_init_kprobes(void)
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v8 7/7] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module
  2015-08-11  0:52 [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes) David Long
@ 2015-08-11  0:52 ` David Long
  2015-08-12 16:22   ` Steve Capper
  2015-08-11 16:56 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support Will Deacon
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-11  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>

Add info prints in sample kprobe handlers for ARM64

Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
---
 samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c b/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c
index 366db1a..51d459c 100644
--- a/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c
+++ b/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c
@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ static int handler_pre(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			" ex1 = 0x%lx\n",
 		p->addr, regs->pc, regs->ex1);
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+	pr_info("pre_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, pc = 0x%lx\n",
+		p->addr, (long)regs->pc);
+#endif
 
 	/* A dump_stack() here will give a stack backtrace */
 	return 0;
@@ -67,6 +71,10 @@ static void handler_post(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	printk(KERN_INFO "post_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, ex1 = 0x%lx\n",
 		p->addr, regs->ex1);
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+	pr_info("post_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, pc = 0x%lx\n",
+		p->addr, (long)regs->pc);
+#endif
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support
  2015-08-11  0:52 [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module David Long
@ 2015-08-11 16:56 ` Will Deacon
  2015-08-11 17:03   ` David Long
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2015-08-11 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Long
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

Hi David,

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:37AM +0100, David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
> 
> This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
> first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised by
> reviewers and also fixes problems discovered during testing.
> 
> This patchset adds support for kernel probes(kprobes), jump probes(jprobes)
> and return probes(kretprobes) support for ARM64.
> 
> The kprobes mechanism makes use of software breakpoint and single stepping
> support available in the ARM v8 kernel.
> 
> This patch depends on:
> 	[PATCH 1/2] Move the pt_regs_offset struct definition from arch to common include file
> 	[PATCH 2/2] Consolidate redundant register/stack access code

Are these two queued somewhere? This series doesn't even build without
them.

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support
  2015-08-11 16:56 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support Will Deacon
@ 2015-08-11 17:03   ` David Long
  2015-08-11 17:36     ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-11 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

On 08/11/15 12:56, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:37AM +0100, David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
>>
>> This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
>> first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised by
>> reviewers and also fixes problems discovered during testing.
>>
>> This patchset adds support for kernel probes(kprobes), jump probes(jprobes)
>> and return probes(kretprobes) support for ARM64.
>>
>> The kprobes mechanism makes use of software breakpoint and single stepping
>> support available in the ARM v8 kernel.
>>
>> This patch depends on:
>> 	[PATCH 1/2] Move the pt_regs_offset struct definition from arch to common include file
>> 	[PATCH 2/2] Consolidate redundant register/stack access code
>
> Are these two queued somewhere? This series doesn't even build without
> them.
>
> Will
>

I posted the last revision of that on July 27.  I don't know if they're 
"queued" somewhere.  They do affect multiple architectures so I'm not 
certain where they would get queued. They also live in a branch in my 
own Linaro repo.

Was there a better way for me to deal with this dependency?  I was 
reluctant to make this into one patch set as the other patch really does 
stand alone as a useful fix.

-dl


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 1/7] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
@ 2015-08-11 17:31   ` Will Deacon
  2015-08-13  3:50     ` David Long
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2015-08-11 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Long
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

Hi David,

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:38AM +0100, David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
> 
> Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature for arm64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig              |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 25 +++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c      | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 318175f..ef5d726 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ config ARM64
>  	select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
>  	select HAVE_PERF_REGS
>  	select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
> +	select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
>  	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
>  	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>  	select IRQ_DOMAIN
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index d6dd9fd..8f440e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ struct pt_regs {
>  	u64 syscallno;
>  };
>  
> +#define MAX_REG_OFFSET (sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) - sizeof(u64))

Can you not use offset_of(struct user_pt_regs, pstate) here?

> +
>  #define arch_has_single_step()	(1)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> @@ -146,6 +148,29 @@ struct pt_regs {
>  #define user_stack_pointer(regs) \
>  	(!compat_user_mode(regs) ? (regs)->sp : (regs)->compat_sp)
>  
> +/**
> + * regs_get_register() - get register value from its offset
> + * @regs:	   pt_regs from which register value is gotten
> + * @offset:    offset number of the register.
> + *
> + * regs_get_register returns the value of a register whose offset from @regs.
> + * The @offset is the offset of the register in struct pt_regs.
> + * If @offset is bigger than MAX_REG_OFFSET, this returns 0.
> + */
> +static inline u64 regs_get_register(struct pt_regs *regs,
> +					      unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +	if (unlikely(offset > MAX_REG_OFFSET))
> +		return 0;
> +	return *(u64 *)((u64)regs + offset);
> +}

Is this guaranteed only to be called on kernel-mode regs, or do we need
to deal with compat tasks too?

> +
> +/* Valid only for Kernel mode traps. */
> +static inline unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	return regs->sp;
> +}
> +
>  static inline unsigned long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	return regs->regs[0];
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> index d882b83..f6199a5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,83 @@
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>  #include <trace/events/syscalls.h>
>  
> +#define ARM_pstate	pstate
> +#define ARM_pc		pc
> +#define ARM_sp		sp
> +#define ARM_x30		regs[30]
> +#define ARM_x29		regs[29]
> +#define ARM_x28		regs[28]
> +#define ARM_x27		regs[27]
> +#define ARM_x26		regs[26]
> +#define ARM_x25		regs[25]
> +#define ARM_x24		regs[24]
> +#define ARM_x23		regs[23]
> +#define ARM_x22		regs[22]
> +#define ARM_x21		regs[21]
> +#define ARM_x20		regs[20]
> +#define ARM_x19		regs[19]
> +#define ARM_x18		regs[18]
> +#define ARM_x17		regs[17]
> +#define ARM_x16		regs[16]
> +#define ARM_x15		regs[15]
> +#define ARM_x14		regs[14]
> +#define ARM_x13		regs[13]
> +#define ARM_x12		regs[12]
> +#define ARM_x11		regs[11]
> +#define ARM_x10		regs[10]
> +#define ARM_x9		regs[9]
> +#define ARM_x8		regs[8]
> +#define ARM_x7		regs[7]
> +#define ARM_x6		regs[6]
> +#define ARM_x5		regs[5]
> +#define ARM_x4		regs[4]
> +#define ARM_x3		regs[3]
> +#define ARM_x2		regs[2]
> +#define ARM_x1		regs[1]
> +#define ARM_x0		regs[0]

I've said it before, but I really don't like these macros. I'd rather
rework the following REG_OFFSET_NAME to be GPR_OFFSET_NAME which could
prefix the "x" in the name field.

> +
> +#define REG_OFFSET_NAME(r) \
> +	{.name = #r, .offset = offsetof(struct pt_regs, ARM_##r)}
> +#define REG_OFFSET_END {.name = NULL, .offset = 0}
> +
> +const struct pt_regs_offset regs_offset_table[] = {
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x0),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x1),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x2),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x3),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x4),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x5),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x6),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x7),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x8),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x9),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x10),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x11),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x12),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x13),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x14),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x15),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x16),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x17),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x18),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x19),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x20),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x21),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x22),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x23),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x24),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x25),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x26),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x27),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x28),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x29),
> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x30),

Does this interact badly with perf tools, which expect to pass "lr" for
x30? (see tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h).

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support
  2015-08-11 17:03   ` David Long
@ 2015-08-11 17:36     ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2015-08-11 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Long
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 06:03:46PM +0100, David Long wrote:
> On 08/11/15 12:56, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:37AM +0100, David Long wrote:
> >> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
> >>
> >> This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
> >> first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised by
> >> reviewers and also fixes problems discovered during testing.
> >>
> >> This patchset adds support for kernel probes(kprobes), jump probes(jprobes)
> >> and return probes(kretprobes) support for ARM64.
> >>
> >> The kprobes mechanism makes use of software breakpoint and single stepping
> >> support available in the ARM v8 kernel.
> >>
> >> This patch depends on:
> >> 	[PATCH 1/2] Move the pt_regs_offset struct definition from arch to common include file
> >> 	[PATCH 2/2] Consolidate redundant register/stack access code
> >
> > Are these two queued somewhere? This series doesn't even build without
> > them.
> 
> I posted the last revision of that on July 27.  I don't know if they're 
> "queued" somewhere.  They do affect multiple architectures so I'm not 
> certain where they would get queued. They also live in a branch in my 
> own Linaro repo.

Well they're not in linux-next, so I guess they're not currently destined
for mainline :(

> Was there a better way for me to deal with this dependency?  I was 
> reluctant to make this into one patch set as the other patch really does 
> stand alone as a useful fix.

I agree (well, it's a cleanup not a fix). Perhaps it's worth reposting
them with akpm also on Cc, as he sometimes picks up tree-wide patches
like that.

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c David Long
@ 2015-08-11 18:00   ` Will Deacon
  2015-08-13  4:23     ` David Long
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2015-08-11 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Long
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:39AM +0100, David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
> 
> Certain instructions are hard to execute correctly out-of-line (as in
> kprobes).  Test functions are added to insn.[hc] to identify these.  The
> instructions include any that use PC-relative addressing, change the PC,
> or change interrupt masking. For efficiency and simplicity test
> functions are also added for small collections of related instructions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c      | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> index 30e50eb..66bfb21 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> @@ -223,8 +223,13 @@ static __always_inline bool aarch64_insn_is_##abbr(u32 code) \
>  static __always_inline u32 aarch64_insn_get_##abbr##_value(void) \
>  { return (val); }
>  
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(adr_adrp,	0x1F000000, 0x10000000)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(prfm_lit,	0xFF000000, 0xD8000000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(str_reg,	0x3FE0EC00, 0x38206800)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldr_reg,	0x3FE0EC00, 0x38606800)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldr_lit,	0xBF000000, 0x18000000)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldrsw_lit,	0xFF000000, 0x98000000)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(exclusive,	0x3F000000, 0x08000000)

Hmm, so this class also pulls in load-acquire and store-release, which
we *should* be able to single-step, no? Maybe it's worth splitting this
category up (or at least changing aarch64_insn_is_exclusive to be more
permissive).

>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(stp_post,	0x7FC00000, 0x28800000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldp_post,	0x7FC00000, 0x28C00000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(stp_pre,	0x7FC00000, 0x29800000)
> @@ -264,19 +269,29 @@ __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ands,	0x7F200000, 0x6A000000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(bics,	0x7F200000, 0x6A200000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(b,		0xFC000000, 0x14000000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(bl,	0xFC000000, 0x94000000)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(b_bl,	0x7C000000, 0x14000000)

Why do we need this when we already have checks for b and bl?

> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(cb,	0x7E000000, 0x34000000)

Likewise for cbz and cbnz...

>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(cbz,	0x7F000000, 0x34000000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(cbnz,	0x7F000000, 0x35000000)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(tb,	0x7E000000, 0x36000000)

... there's a pattern here!

>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(tbz,	0x7F000000, 0x36000000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(tbnz,	0x7F000000, 0x37000000)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(b_bl_cb_tb, 0x5C000000, 0x14000000)

I must be missing something :)

>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(bcond,	0xFF000010, 0x54000000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(svc,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4000001)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(hvc,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4000002)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(smc,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4000003)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(brk,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4200000)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(exception,	0xFF000000, 0xD4000000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(hint,	0xFFFFF01F, 0xD503201F)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(br,	0xFFFFFC1F, 0xD61F0000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(blr,	0xFFFFFC1F, 0xD63F0000)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(br_blr,	0xFFDFFC1F, 0xD61F0000)
>  __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ret,	0xFFFFFC1F, 0xD65F0000)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(msr_imm,	0xFFF8F01F, 0xD500401F)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(msr_reg,	0xFFF00000, 0xD5100000)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(set_clr_daif, 0xFFFFF0DF, 0xD50340DF)
> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(rd_wr_daif, 0xFFDFFFE0, 0xD51B4220)

I think I'd rather have separate decoders to decode the register field
of an mrs/msr instruction than overload each encoding here.

Anyway, on the whole this looks pretty good, I'd just prefer not to build
compound instruction checks at the encoding level (even though it looks
like you did a good job on the values).

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
@ 2015-08-12 13:37   ` Will Deacon
  2015-12-08  6:05     ` David Long
  2015-08-13 11:42   ` Steve Capper
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2015-08-12 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Long
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

Hi David,

Thanks for the patch. Took me a while to get through it and I suspect
I missed things, but comments inline all the same.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:40AM +0100, David Long wrote:
> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
>
> Add support for basic kernel probes(kprobes) and jump probes
> (jprobes) for ARM64.
>
> Kprobes utilizes software breakpoint and single step debug
> exceptions supported on ARM v8.
>
> A software breakpoint is placed at the probe address to trap the
> kernel execution into the kprobe handler.
>
> ARM v8 supports enabling single stepping before the break exception
> return (ERET), with next PC in exception return address (ELR_EL1). The
> kprobe handler prepares an executable memory slot for out-of-line
> execution with a copy of the original instruction being probed, and
> enables single stepping. The PC is set to the out-of-line slot address
> before the ERET. With this scheme, the instruction is executed with the
> exact same register context except for the PC (and DAIF) registers.
>
> Debug mask (PSTATE.D) is enabled only when single stepping a recursive
> kprobe, e.g.: during kprobes reenter so that probed instruction can be
> single stepped within the kprobe handler -exception- context.
> The recursion depth of kprobe is always 2, i.e. upon probe re-entry,
> any further re-entry is prevented by not calling handlers and the case
> counted as a missed kprobe).
>
> Single stepping from the x-o-l slot has a drawback for PC-relative accesses
> like branching and symbolic literals access as the offset from the new PC
> (slot address) may not be ensured to fit in the immediate value of
> the opcode. Such instructions need simulation, so reject
> probing them.
>
> Instructions generating exceptions or cpu mode change are rejected
> for probing.
>
> Instructions using Exclusive Monitor are rejected too.
>
> System instructions are mostly enabled for stepping, except MSR/MRS
> accesses to "DAIF" flags in PSTATE, which are not safe for
> probing.

I can imagine other MSR instructions that aren't safe for probing too
For example, disabling the MMU. Maybe we should just blanket-ban these
guys for now?

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> index 40ec68a..92d7cea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> @@ -90,6 +90,11 @@
>
>  #define CACHE_FLUSH_IS_SAFE            1
>
> +/* kprobes BRK opcodes with ESR encoding  */
> +#define BRK64_ESR_MASK         0xFFFF
> +#define BRK64_ESR_KPROBES      0x0004
> +#define BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES   (AARCH64_BREAK_MON | (BRK64_ESR_KPROBES << 5))

These are probably due some slight renaming with the BRK clean-up we've
got queued for 4.3.

>  /* AArch32 */
>  #define DBG_ESR_EVT_BKPT       0x4
>  #define DBG_ESR_EVT_VECC       0x5
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..af31c4d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> + * General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _ARM_KPROBES_H
> +#define _ARM_KPROBES_H
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> +
> +#define __ARCH_WANT_KPROBES_INSN_SLOT
> +#define MAX_INSN_SIZE                  1
> +#define MAX_STACK_SIZE                 128
> +
> +#define flush_insn_slot(p)             do { } while (0)
> +#define kretprobe_blacklist_size       0
> +
> +#include <asm/probes.h>
> +
> +struct prev_kprobe {
> +       struct kprobe *kp;
> +       unsigned int status;
> +};
> +
> +/* Single step context for kprobe */
> +struct kprobe_step_ctx {
> +#define KPROBES_STEP_NONE      0x0
> +#define KPROBES_STEP_PENDING   0x1
> +       unsigned long ss_status;

Why not bool ss_pending?

> +       unsigned long match_addr;
> +};
> +
> +/* per-cpu kprobe control block */
> +struct kprobe_ctlblk {
> +       unsigned int kprobe_status;
> +       unsigned long saved_irqflag;
> +       struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
> +       struct kprobe_step_ctx ss_ctx;
> +       struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
> +       char jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
> +};
> +
> +void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *);
> +int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr);
> +int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> +                            unsigned long val, void *data);
> +int kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
> +int kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
> +
> +#endif /* _ARM_KPROBES_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7f5a27f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> + * General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +#ifndef _ARM_PROBES_H
> +#define _ARM_PROBES_H
> +
> +struct kprobe;
> +struct arch_specific_insn;
> +
> +typedef u32 kprobe_opcode_t;
> +typedef unsigned long (kprobes_pstate_check_t)(unsigned long);
> +typedef unsigned long
> +(probes_condition_check_t)(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *);
> +typedef void
> +(probes_prepare_t)(struct kprobe *, struct arch_specific_insn *);
> +typedef void (kprobes_handler_t) (u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *);
> +
> +enum pc_restore_type {
> +       NO_RESTORE,
> +       RESTORE_PC,
> +};
> +
> +struct kprobe_pc_restore {
> +       enum pc_restore_type type;
> +       unsigned long addr;
> +};
> +
> +/* architecture specific copy of original instruction */
> +struct arch_specific_insn {
> +       kprobe_opcode_t *insn;
> +       kprobes_pstate_check_t *pstate_cc;
> +       probes_condition_check_t *check_condn;
> +       probes_prepare_t *prepare;
> +       kprobes_handler_t *handler;
> +       /* restore address after step xol */
> +       struct kprobe_pc_restore restore;
> +};
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index 8f440e9..aadf61a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -206,7 +206,8 @@ static inline int valid_user_regs(struct user_pt_regs *regs)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -#define instruction_pointer(regs)      ((unsigned long)(regs)->pc)
> +#define instruction_pointer(regs)      ((regs)->pc)
> +#define stack_pointer(regs)            ((regs)->sp)

We already have kernel_stack_pointer (I think you added it in patch 1),
so can't you just use that?

>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  extern unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> index 426d076..1319872 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_PM)            += sleep.o suspend.o
>  arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)           += cpuidle.o
>  arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)         += jump_label.o
>  arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)               += kgdb.o
> +arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES)            += kprobes.o kprobes-arm64.o
>  arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)                        += efi.o efi-stub.o efi-entry.o
>  arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)                        += pci.o
>  arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARMV8_DEPRECATED)   += armv8_deprecated.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> index b056369..486ee94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include <linux/hardirq.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/ptrace.h>
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
>  #include <linux/stat.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>
> @@ -228,6 +229,7 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>                                struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>         siginfo_t info;
> +       bool handler_found = false;
>
>         /*
>          * If we are stepping a pending breakpoint, call the hw_breakpoint
> @@ -251,15 +253,21 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>                  */
>                 user_rewind_single_step(current);
>         } else {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> +               if (kprobe_single_step_handler(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> +                       handler_found = true;
> +#endif
>                 if (call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)

Is this because you need to called first? If so, maybe we could extend the
step hook to take an optional priority and reject duplicate entries with
the same value?

Even then, it's not clear that you do always want to be called first. For
example, if the instruction you're single-stepping in the x-o-l buffer
triggers a hardware watchpoint, then you probably want to handle the
watchpoint single-step exception before the kprobe.

> -                       return 0;
> -
> -               pr_warning("Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1\n");
> -               /*
> -                * Re-enable stepping since we know that we will be
> -                * returning to regs.
> -                */
> -               set_regs_spsr_ss(regs);
> +                       handler_found = true;
> +
> +               if (!handler_found) {
> +                       pr_warn("Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1\n");
> +                       /*
> +                        * Re-enable stepping since we know that we will be
> +                        * returning to regs.
> +                        */
> +                       set_regs_spsr_ss(regs);
> +               }
>         }
>
>         return 0;
> @@ -315,8 +323,15 @@ static int brk_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>                 };
>
>                 force_sig_info(SIGTRAP, &info, current);
> -       } else if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
> -               pr_warning("Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1\n");
> +       }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> +       else if ((esr & BRK64_ESR_MASK) == BRK64_ESR_KPROBES) {
> +               if (kprobe_breakpoint_handler(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> +                       return -EFAULT;
> +       }
> +#endif
> +       else if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
> +               pr_warn("Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1\n");

Same here.

Also, we now use BRK to implement BUG(), but I *think* that's ok because
you reject kprobes on exception generating instructions.

>                 return -EFAULT;
>         }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f958c52
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> + * General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <asm/kprobes.h>
> +#include <asm/insn.h>
> +
> +#include "kprobes-arm64.h"
> +
> +static bool __kprobes aarch64_insn_is_steppable(u32 insn)
> +{
> +       if (aarch64_get_insn_class(insn) == AARCH64_INSN_CLS_BR_SYS) {
> +               if (aarch64_insn_is_branch(insn))
> +                       return false;
> +
> +               /* modification of daif creates issues */
> +               if (aarch64_insn_is_daif_access(insn))
> +                       return false;
> +
> +               if (aarch64_insn_is_exception(insn))
> +                       return false;
> +
> +               if (aarch64_insn_is_hint(insn))
> +                       return aarch64_insn_is_nop(insn);
> +
> +               return true;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (aarch64_insn_uses_literal(insn))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       if (aarch64_insn_is_exclusive(insn))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return:
> + *   INSN_REJECTED     If instruction is one not allowed to kprobe,
> + *   INSN_GOOD         If instruction is supported and uses instruction slot,
> + *   INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT If instruction is supported but doesn't use its slot.
> + */
> +enum kprobe_insn __kprobes
> +arm_kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi)
> +{
> +       /*
> +        * Instructions reading or modifying the PC won't work from the XOL
> +        * slot.
> +        */
> +       if (aarch64_insn_is_steppable(insn))
> +               return INSN_GOOD;
> +       else
> +               return INSN_REJECTED;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..87e7891
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> + * General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_ARM64_H
> +#define _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_ARM64_H
> +
> +enum kprobe_insn {
> +       INSN_REJECTED,
> +       INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT,
> +       INSN_GOOD,
> +};
> +
> +enum kprobe_insn __kprobes
> +arm_kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi);
> +
> +#endif /* _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_ARM64_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..601d2c6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,537 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
> + *
> + * Kprobes support for ARM64
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
> + * Author: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> + * General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + */
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
> +#include <linux/stringify.h>
> +#include <asm/traps.h>
> +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> +#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
> +#include <asm/system_misc.h>
> +#include <asm/insn.h>
> +
> +#include "kprobes.h"
> +#include "kprobes-arm64.h"
> +
> +#define MIN_STACK_SIZE(addr)   min((unsigned long)MAX_STACK_SIZE,      \
> +       (unsigned long)current_thread_info() + THREAD_START_SP - (addr))

You can avoid the cast by using task_stack_page(current).

That said, I don't fully understand what this is for. Given that we don't
probe the exception text, we should always have at least MAX_STACK_SIZE
pushed on the stack thanks to the pt_regs structure, so when does this
condition ever evaluate to something less?

> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
> +
> +static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> +       /* prepare insn slot */
> +       p->ainsn.insn[0] = p->opcode;
> +
> +       flush_icache_range((uintptr_t) (p->ainsn.insn),
> +                          (uintptr_t) (p->ainsn.insn) + MAX_INSN_SIZE);

Hmm, is this right? MAX_INSN_SIZE is 1, so I don't think you're flushing
enough (but in reality you'll flush a whole cacheline and get away with
it).

> +
> +       /*
> +        * Needs restoring of return address after stepping xol.
> +        */
> +       p->ainsn.restore.addr = (unsigned long) p->addr +
> +         sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
> +       p->ainsn.restore.type = RESTORE_PC;
> +}
> +
> +int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> +       kprobe_opcode_t insn;
> +       unsigned long probe_addr = (unsigned long)p->addr;

x86 has some complications to deal with multiple kprobes on the same
address afaict. Do we care about that at all?

> +       /* copy instruction */
> +       insn = *p->addr;

Instructions are always little-endian, so I think you need an le32_to_cpu
here to work on a big-endian kernel. I suspect you may have a few other
endianness bugs lurking, so it would be worth testing this in big-endian
(you can run a big-endian kvm guest easily enough under kvmtool).

> +       p->opcode = insn;
> +
> +       if (in_exception_text(probe_addr))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       /* decode instruction */
> +       switch (arm_kprobe_decode_insn(insn, &p->ainsn)) {
> +       case INSN_REJECTED:     /* insn not supported */
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       case INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT: /* insn need simulation */
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       case INSN_GOOD: /* instruction uses slot */
> +               p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
> +               if (!p->ainsn.insn)
> +                       return -ENOMEM;
> +               break;
> +       };
> +
> +       /* prepare the instruction */
> +       arch_prepare_ss_slot(p);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __kprobes patch_text(kprobe_opcode_t *addr, u32 opcode)
> +{
> +       void *addrs[1];
> +       u32 insns[1];
> +
> +       addrs[0] = (void *)addr;
> +       insns[0] = (u32)opcode;
> +
> +       return aarch64_insn_patch_text_sync(addrs, insns, 1);

Any reason not to use aarch64_insn_patch_text here?

> +}
> +
> +/* arm kprobe: install breakpoint in text */
> +void __kprobes arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> +       patch_text(p->addr, BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES);
> +}
> +
> +/* disarm kprobe: remove breakpoint from text */
> +void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> +       patch_text(p->addr, p->opcode);
> +}
> +
> +void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> +       if (p->ainsn.insn) {
> +               free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.insn, 0);
> +               p->ainsn.insn = NULL;
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> +{
> +       kcb->prev_kprobe.kp = kprobe_running();
> +       kcb->prev_kprobe.status = kcb->kprobe_status;
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes restore_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> +{
> +       __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, kcb->prev_kprobe.kp);
> +       kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe.status;
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> +       __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * The D-flag (Debug mask) is set (masked) upon exception entry.

To avoid confusing the casual reader, can we specify that we're talking
about *debug* exception entry, please?

> + * Kprobes needs to clear (unmask) D-flag -ONLY- in case of recursive
> + * probe i.e. when probe hit from kprobe handler context upon
> + * executing the pre/post handlers. In this case we return with
> + * D-flag clear so that single-stepping can be carried-out.
> + *
> + * Leave D-flag set in all other cases.
> + */
> +static void __kprobes
> +spsr_set_debug_flag(struct pt_regs *regs, int mask)
> +{
> +       unsigned long spsr = regs->pstate;
> +
> +       if (mask)
> +               spsr |= PSR_D_BIT;
> +       else
> +               spsr &= ~PSR_D_BIT;
> +
> +       regs->pstate = spsr;
> +}

This continues to melt my brain, but I think it's the right thing to do
as long as the krpobes recursion is bound (as you stated in the commit
log).

> +
> +/*
> + * Interrupts need to be disabled before single-step mode is set, and not
> + * reenabled until after single-step mode ends.
> + * Without disabling interrupt on local CPU, there is a chance of
> + * interrupt occurrence in the period of exception return and  start of
> + * out-of-line single-step, that result in wrongly single stepping
> + * the interrupt handler.

*into* the interrupt handler.

Curious: what happens if the instruction aborts for some other reason?
I assume we forbid probing copy_from_user etc?

> + */
> +static void __kprobes kprobes_save_local_irqflag(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> +
> +       kcb->saved_irqflag = regs->pstate;
> +       regs->pstate |= PSR_I_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> +
> +       if (kcb->saved_irqflag & PSR_I_BIT)
> +               regs->pstate |= PSR_I_BIT;
> +       else
> +               regs->pstate &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes
> +set_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +       kcb->ss_ctx.ss_status = KPROBES_STEP_PENDING;
> +       kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = addr + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes clear_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> +{
> +       kcb->ss_ctx.ss_status = KPROBES_STEP_NONE;
> +       kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes
> +skip_singlestep_missed(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +       /* set return addr to next pc to continue */
> +       instruction_pointer(regs) += sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes setup_singlestep(struct kprobe *p,
> +                                      struct pt_regs *regs,
> +                                      struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, int reenter)
> +{
> +       unsigned long slot;
> +
> +       if (reenter) {
> +               save_previous_kprobe(kcb);
> +               set_current_kprobe(p);
> +               kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_REENTER;
> +       } else {
> +               kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (p->ainsn.insn) {
> +               /* prepare for single stepping */
> +               slot = (unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn;
> +
> +               set_ss_context(kcb, slot);      /* mark pending ss */
> +
> +               if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
> +                       spsr_set_debug_flag(regs, 0);
> +
> +               /* IRQs and single stepping do not mix well. */
> +               kprobes_save_local_irqflag(regs);
> +               kernel_enable_single_step(regs);
> +               instruction_pointer(regs) = slot;

Have you tried this with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA=y? I'm not sure that the
buffer will be executable in that case.

> +       } else  {
> +               BUG();
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static int __kprobes reenter_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
> +                                   struct pt_regs *regs,
> +                                   struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> +{
> +       switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
> +       case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
> +       case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
> +               if (!p->ainsn.check_condn || p->ainsn.check_condn(p, regs)) {
> +                       kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
> +                       setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 1);
> +               } else  {
> +                       /* condition check failed, skip stepping */
> +                       skip_singlestep_missed(kcb, regs);
> +               }
> +               break;
> +       case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
> +       case KPROBE_REENTER:
> +               pr_warn("Unrecoverable kprobe detected at %p.\n", p->addr);
> +               dump_kprobe(p);
> +               BUG();
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               WARN_ON(1);
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes
> +post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +       struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
> +
> +       if (!cur)
> +               return;
> +
> +       /* return addr restore if non-branching insn */
> +       if (cur->ainsn.restore.type == RESTORE_PC) {
> +               instruction_pointer(regs) = cur->ainsn.restore.addr;
> +               if (!instruction_pointer(regs))
> +                       BUG();
> +       }
> +
> +       /* restore back original saved kprobe variables and continue */
> +       if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER) {
> +               restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +       /* call post handler */
> +       kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE;
> +       if (cur->post_handler)  {
> +               /* post_handler can hit breakpoint and single step
> +                * again, so we enable D-flag for recursive exception.
> +                */
> +               cur->post_handler(cur, regs, 0);
> +       }
> +
> +       reset_current_kprobe();
> +}
> +
> +int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr)
> +{
> +       struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> +
> +       switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
> +       case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
> +       case KPROBE_REENTER:
> +               /*
> +                * We are here because the instruction being single
> +                * stepped caused a page fault. We reset the current
> +                * kprobe and the ip points back to the probe address
> +                * and allow the page fault handler to continue as a
> +                * normal page fault.
> +                */
> +               instruction_pointer(regs) = (unsigned long)cur->addr;
> +               if (!instruction_pointer(regs))
> +                       BUG();
> +               if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
> +                       restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
> +               else
> +                       reset_current_kprobe();
> +
> +               break;
> +       case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
> +       case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
> +               /*
> +                * We increment the nmissed count for accounting,
> +                * we can also use npre/npostfault count for accounting
> +                * these specific fault cases.
> +                */
> +               kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(cur);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * We come here because instructions in the pre/post
> +                * handler caused the page_fault, this could happen
> +                * if handler tries to access user space by
> +                * copy_from_user(), get_user() etc. Let the
> +                * user-specified handler try to fix it first.
> +                */
> +               if (cur->fault_handler && cur->fault_handler(cur, regs, fsr))
> +                       return 1;
> +
> +               /*
> +                * In case the user-specified fault handler returned
> +                * zero, try to fix up.
> +                */
> +               if (fixup_exception(regs))
> +                       return 1;

Won't this get dealt with in do_page_fault if we just return 1? (i.e.
__do_kernel_fault would get called, which would then call fixup_exception).

> +
> +               break;
> +       }
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> +                                      unsigned long val, void *data)
> +{
> +       return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
> +
> +void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)

static? (or inline into kprobe_breakpoint_handler)

> +{
> +       struct kprobe *p, *cur;
> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
> +       unsigned long addr = instruction_pointer(regs);
> +
> +       kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> +       cur = kprobe_running();

I keep getting this confused with current. Can you give it a better name
please?

> +
> +       p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *) addr);
> +
> +       if (p) {
> +               if (cur) {
> +                       if (reenter_kprobe(p, regs, kcb))
> +                               return;
> +               } else if (!p->ainsn.check_condn ||
> +                          p->ainsn.check_condn(p, regs)) {
> +                       /* Probe hit and conditional execution check ok. */
> +                       set_current_kprobe(p);
> +                       kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
> +
> +                       /*
> +                        * If we have no pre-handler or it returned 0, we
> +                        * continue with normal processing.  If we have a
> +                        * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it prepped
> +                        * for calling the break_handler below on re-entry,
> +                        * so get out doing nothing more here.
> +                        *
> +                        * pre_handler can hit a breakpoint and can step thru
> +                        * before return, keep PSTATE D-flag enabled until
> +                        * pre_handler return back.
> +                        */
> +                       if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs)) {
> +                               kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
> +                               setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
> +                               return;
> +                       }
> +               } else {
> +                       /*
> +                        * Breakpoint hit but conditional check failed,
> +                        * so just skip the instruction (NOP behaviour)
> +                        */
> +                       skip_singlestep_missed(kcb, regs);

Why is this necessary? (i.e. why doesn't the condition get honoured
during the single-step?).

> +                       return;
> +               }
> +       } else if (*(kprobe_opcode_t *) addr != BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES) {
> +               /*
> +                * The breakpoint instruction was removed right
> +                * after we hit it.  Another cpu has removed
> +                * either a probepoint or a debugger breakpoint
> +                * at this address.  In either case, no further
> +                * handling of this interrupt is appropriate.
> +                * Return back to original instruction, and continue.
> +                */
> +               return;
> +       } else if (cur) {
> +               /* We probably hit a jprobe.  Call its break handler. */
> +               if (cur->break_handler && cur->break_handler(cur, regs)) {
> +                       kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
> +                       setup_singlestep(cur, regs, kcb, 0);
> +                       return;
> +               }
> +       } else {
> +               /* breakpoint is removed, now in a race
> +                * Return back to original instruction & continue.
> +                */

Can you tidy this up by combining the "do nothing" case with the
"*(kprobe_opcode_t *) addr != BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES" case?

> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static int __kprobes
> +kprobe_ss_hit(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +       if ((kcb->ss_ctx.ss_status == KPROBES_STEP_PENDING)
> +           && (kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr == addr)) {
> +               clear_ss_context(kcb);  /* clear pending ss */
> +               return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> +       }
> +       /* not ours, kprobes should ignore it */
> +       return DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
> +}
> +
> +int __kprobes
> +kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
> +{
> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> +       int retval;
> +
> +       /* return error if this is not our step */
> +       retval = kprobe_ss_hit(kcb, instruction_pointer(regs));
> +
> +       if (retval == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
> +               kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(regs);
> +               kernel_disable_single_step();
> +
> +               if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
> +                       spsr_set_debug_flag(regs, 1);
> +
> +               post_kprobe_handler(kcb, regs);
> +       }
> +
> +       return retval;
> +}
> +
> +int __kprobes
> +kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
> +{
> +       kprobe_handler(regs);
> +       return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +int __kprobes setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +       struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> +       long stack_ptr = stack_pointer(regs);
> +
> +       kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs;
> +       memcpy(kcb->jprobes_stack, (void *)stack_ptr,
> +              MIN_STACK_SIZE(stack_ptr));
> +
> +       instruction_pointer(regs) = (long)jp->entry;
> +       preempt_disable();
> +       return 1;
> +}
> +
> +void __kprobes jprobe_return(void)
> +{
> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Jprobe handler return by entering break exception,
> +        * encoded same as kprobe, but with following conditions
> +        * -a magic number in x0 to identify from rest of other kprobes.
> +        * -restore stack addr to original saved pt_regs
> +        */
> +       asm volatile ("ldr x0, [%0]\n\t"
> +                     "mov sp, x0\n\t"
> +                     "ldr x0, =" __stringify(JPROBES_MAGIC_NUM) "\n\t"

This feels flakey to me and I worry that we could end up invoking the
jprobe_return handler thanks to a kprobe with the right "magic" value in
x0 and a race with the kprobe getting removed.

Why can't we do what x86 does and check the originating PC falls inside
the return code?

> +                     "BRK %1\n\t"
> +                     "NOP\n\t"

No need to capitalise these two instructions. Also, what's the nop for?

> +                     :
> +                     : "r"(&kcb->jprobe_saved_regs.sp),

Why do you need to do this indirectly? (as opposed to just moving straight
to sp).

> +                     "I"(BRK64_ESR_KPROBES)
> +                     : "memory");

unreachable()?

> +}
> +
> +int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> +       long stack_addr = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs.sp;
> +       long orig_sp = stack_pointer(regs);
> +       struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
> +
> +       if (regs->regs[0] == JPROBES_MAGIC_NUM) {

Change the polarity with early return and lose a level of indentation below.

> +               if (orig_sp != stack_addr) {
> +                       struct pt_regs *saved_regs =
> +                           (struct pt_regs *)kcb->jprobe_saved_regs.sp;
> +                       pr_err("current sp %lx does not match saved sp %lx\n",
> +                              orig_sp, stack_addr);
> +                       pr_err("Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
> +                       show_regs(saved_regs);
> +                       pr_err("Current registers\n");
> +                       show_regs(regs);
> +                       BUG();
> +               }
> +               *regs = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
> +               memcpy((void *)stack_addr, kcb->jprobes_stack,
> +                      MIN_STACK_SIZE(stack_addr));
> +               preempt_enable_no_resched();
> +               return 1;
> +       }
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __init arch_init_kprobes(void)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e98ad60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> + * General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_H
> +#define _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_H
> +
> +#define JPROBES_MAGIC_NUM      0xa5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5
> +
> +/* Move this out to appropriate header file */
> +int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
> +#endif /* _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_H */

I don't think this warrants an extra header. Use uaccess.h and stick
the magic number somewhere else if you still need it.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> index 9807333..1fa6adc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ SECTIONS
>                         TEXT_TEXT
>                         SCHED_TEXT
>                         LOCK_TEXT
> +                       KPROBES_TEXT
>                         HYPERVISOR_TEXT
>                         IDMAP_TEXT
>                         *(.fixup)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 94d98cd..01bf525 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,28 @@
>
>  static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> +static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
> +{

The function name isn't very descriptive. Why not follow x86 with
"kprobes_fault"?

> +       int ret = 0;
> +
> +       /* kprobe_running() needs smp_processor_id() */

But we could already be running on a different core from the one that
triggered the fault, so isn't this racy?

> +       if (!user_mode(regs)) {
> +               preempt_disable();
> +               if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, esr))
> +                       ret = 1;
> +               preempt_enable();
> +       }
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 4/7] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support David Long
@ 2015-08-12 14:29   ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2015-08-12 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Long
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

Hi David,

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:41AM +0100, David Long wrote:
> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
> 
> Kprobes needs simulation of instructions that cannot be stepped
> from different memory location, e.g.: those instructions
> that uses PC-relative addressing. In simulation, the behaviour
> of the instruction is implemented using a copy of pt_regs.
> 
> Following instruction catagories are simulated:
>  - All branching instructions(conditional, register, and immediate)
>  - Literal access instructions(load-literal, adr/adrp)
> 
> Conditional execution is limited to branching instructions in
> ARM v8. If conditions at PSTATE do not match the condition fields
> of opcode, the instruction is effectively NOP. Kprobes considers
> this case as 'miss'.
> 
> Thanks to Will Cohen for assorted suggested changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e68aa0c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm64/kernel/probes-condn-check.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited
> + *
> + * Copied from: arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-common.c
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> + * General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * Description:
> + *
> + *  AArch64 and AArch32 shares same conditional(CNZV) flags encoding.
> + *  This file implements conditional check helpers compatible with
> + *  both AArch64 and AArch32 modes. Uprobes on v8 can handle both 32-bit
> + *  & 64-bit user-space instructions, so we abstract the common functions
> + *  in this file. While AArch64 and AArch32 specific instruction handling
> + *  are implemented in separate files, this file contains common bits.
> + */
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <asm/probes.h>
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_eq(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       return pstate & PSR_Z_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_ne(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       return (~pstate) & PSR_Z_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_cs(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       return pstate & PSR_C_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_cc(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       return (~pstate) & PSR_C_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_mi(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       return pstate & PSR_N_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_pl(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       return (~pstate) & PSR_N_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_vs(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       return pstate & PSR_V_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_vc(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       return (~pstate) & PSR_V_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_hi(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);       /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
> +       return pstate & PSR_C_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_ls(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);       /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
> +       return (~pstate) & PSR_C_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_ge(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       pstate ^= (pstate << 3);        /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
> +       return (~pstate) & PSR_N_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_lt(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       pstate ^= (pstate << 3);        /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
> +       return pstate & PSR_N_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_gt(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       /*PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
> +       unsigned long temp = pstate ^ (pstate << 3);
> +
> +       temp |= (pstate << 1);  /*PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
> +       return (~temp) & PSR_N_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_le(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       /*PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
> +       unsigned long temp = pstate ^ (pstate << 3);
> +
> +       temp |= (pstate << 1);  /*PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
> +       return temp & PSR_N_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long __kprobes __check_al(unsigned long pstate)
> +{
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +kprobes_pstate_check_t * const kprobe_condition_checks[16] = {
> +       &__check_eq, &__check_ne, &__check_cs, &__check_cc,
> +       &__check_mi, &__check_pl, &__check_vs, &__check_vc,
> +       &__check_hi, &__check_ls, &__check_ge, &__check_lt,
> +       &__check_gt, &__check_le, &__check_al, &__check_al
> +};

I *much* prefer this to our current inclusion / compilation of opcode.[ch]
from arch/arm/. Do you think you could put this somewhere like insn.h and
move armv8_deprecated.c over to using it?

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 5/7] arm64: Add trampoline code for kretprobes
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] arm64: Add trampoline code for kretprobes David Long
@ 2015-08-12 14:47   ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2015-08-12 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Long
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

Hi Will,

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:42AM +0100, David Long wrote:
> From: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
> 
> The trampoline code is used by kretprobes to capture a return from a probed
> function.  This is done by saving the registers, calling the handler, and
> restoring the registers.  The code then returns to the original saved caller
> return address.  It is necessary to do this directly instead of using a
> software breakpoint because the code used in processing that breakpoint
> could itself be kprobe'd and cause a problematic reentry into the debug
> exception handler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes_trampoline.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes_trampoline.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..dd0172b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes_trampoline.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +/*
> + * trampoline entry and return code for kretprobes.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/linkage.h>
> +#include <generated/asm-offsets.h>
> +
> +	.text
> +
> +ENTRY(kretprobe_trampoline)
> +
> +	sub sp, sp, #S_FRAME_SIZE
> +
> +	stp x0, x1, [sp, #S_X0]
> +	stp x2, x3, [sp, #S_X2]
> +	stp x4, x5, [sp, #S_X4]
> +	stp x6, x7, [sp, #S_X6]
> +	stp x8, x9, [sp, #S_X8]
> +	stp x10, x11, [sp, #S_X10]
> +	stp x12, x13, [sp, #S_X12]
> +	stp x14, x15, [sp, #S_X14]
> +	stp x16, x17, [sp, #S_X16]
> +	stp x18, x19, [sp, #S_X18]
> +	stp x20, x21, [sp, #S_X20]
> +	stp x22, x23, [sp, #S_X22]
> +	stp x24, x25, [sp, #S_X24]
> +	stp x26, x27, [sp, #S_X26]
> +	stp x28, x29, [sp, #S_X28]
> +	str x30, [sp, #S_LR]
> +	mrs x0, nzcv
> +	str x0, [sp, #S_PSTATE]

I'm slightly wary of this, as it means user_mode(regs) will return true
for the pt_regs passed into the handler. Do we need to force the mode?
What about things like the I bit?

Similarly, why don't you save the stack pointer?

> +
> +	mov x0, sp
> +	bl trampoline_probe_handler
> +	/* Replace trampoline address in lr with actual
> +	   orig_ret_addr return address. */
> +	str x0, [sp, #S_LR]

Why can't the trampoline_probe_handler update the pt_regs directly?

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 7/7] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module David Long
@ 2015-08-12 16:22   ` Steve Capper
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Steve Capper @ 2015-08-12 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Long
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	Sandeepa Prabhu, William Cohen, Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, David Miller, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

On 11 August 2015 at 01:52, David Long <dave.long@linaro.org> wrote:
> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
>
> Add info prints in sample kprobe handlers for ARM64
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
> ---
>  samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

I'm not going through this series backwards, but I did run the kprobe
sample modules first, and nothing happened... (i.e. nothing fired).

The kernel usage of do_fork (which is used as an example by the sample
code) has been changed by:
3033f14a clone: support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

Now everything appears to go through _do_fork rather than do_fork.

I'll send a fixup shortly, but if anyone else is running these modules
and worrying about a lack of events... worry less :-).

Cheers,
--
Steve

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 1/7] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature
  2015-08-11 17:31   ` Will Deacon
@ 2015-08-13  3:50     ` David Long
  2015-08-18  9:38       ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-13  3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

On 08/11/15 13:31, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:38AM +0100, David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
>>
>> Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature for arm64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/Kconfig              |  1 +
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 25 +++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c      | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index 318175f..ef5d726 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ config ARM64
>>   	select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
>>   	select HAVE_PERF_REGS
>>   	select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
>> +	select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
>>   	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
>>   	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>>   	select IRQ_DOMAIN
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> index d6dd9fd..8f440e9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> @@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ struct pt_regs {
>>   	u64 syscallno;
>>   };
>>
>> +#define MAX_REG_OFFSET (sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) - sizeof(u64))
>
> Can you not use offset_of(struct user_pt_regs, pstate) here?

Yes, "offsetof" actually though.  I've just made that change.

>> +
>>   #define arch_has_single_step()	(1)
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> @@ -146,6 +148,29 @@ struct pt_regs {
>>   #define user_stack_pointer(regs) \
>>   	(!compat_user_mode(regs) ? (regs)->sp : (regs)->compat_sp)
>>
>> +/**
>> + * regs_get_register() - get register value from its offset
>> + * @regs:	   pt_regs from which register value is gotten
>> + * @offset:    offset number of the register.
>> + *
>> + * regs_get_register returns the value of a register whose offset from @regs.
>> + * The @offset is the offset of the register in struct pt_regs.
>> + * If @offset is bigger than MAX_REG_OFFSET, this returns 0.
>> + */
>> +static inline u64 regs_get_register(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> +					      unsigned int offset)
>> +{
>> +	if (unlikely(offset > MAX_REG_OFFSET))
>> +		return 0;
>> +	return *(u64 *)((u64)regs + offset);
>> +}
>
> Is this guaranteed only to be called on kernel-mode regs, or do we need
> to deal with compat tasks too?

If I understand the question I think it's fine that it only deals with 
kernel-mode registers.  The implemenation is functionally similar to the 
other five architectures that implement it.

>> +
>> +/* Valid only for Kernel mode traps. */
>> +static inline unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +	return regs->sp;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static inline unsigned long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>   {
>>   	return regs->regs[0];
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>> index d882b83..f6199a5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,83 @@
>>   #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>>   #include <trace/events/syscalls.h>
>>
>> +#define ARM_pstate	pstate
>> +#define ARM_pc		pc
>> +#define ARM_sp		sp
>> +#define ARM_x30		regs[30]
>> +#define ARM_x29		regs[29]
>> +#define ARM_x28		regs[28]
>> +#define ARM_x27		regs[27]
>> +#define ARM_x26		regs[26]
>> +#define ARM_x25		regs[25]
>> +#define ARM_x24		regs[24]
>> +#define ARM_x23		regs[23]
>> +#define ARM_x22		regs[22]
>> +#define ARM_x21		regs[21]
>> +#define ARM_x20		regs[20]
>> +#define ARM_x19		regs[19]
>> +#define ARM_x18		regs[18]
>> +#define ARM_x17		regs[17]
>> +#define ARM_x16		regs[16]
>> +#define ARM_x15		regs[15]
>> +#define ARM_x14		regs[14]
>> +#define ARM_x13		regs[13]
>> +#define ARM_x12		regs[12]
>> +#define ARM_x11		regs[11]
>> +#define ARM_x10		regs[10]
>> +#define ARM_x9		regs[9]
>> +#define ARM_x8		regs[8]
>> +#define ARM_x7		regs[7]
>> +#define ARM_x6		regs[6]
>> +#define ARM_x5		regs[5]
>> +#define ARM_x4		regs[4]
>> +#define ARM_x3		regs[3]
>> +#define ARM_x2		regs[2]
>> +#define ARM_x1		regs[1]
>> +#define ARM_x0		regs[0]
>
> I've said it before, but I really don't like these macros. I'd rather
> rework the following REG_OFFSET_NAME to be GPR_OFFSET_NAME which could
> prefix the "x" in the name field.

OK, I've ripped that out and replaced REG_OFFSET_NAME with 
GPR_OFFSET_NAME, for the numbered registers.  I'm using REGS_OFFSET_NAME 
(defined for all architectures in my earlier cleanup patch) for the 
non-numbered registers.

>
>> +
>> +#define REG_OFFSET_NAME(r) \
>> +	{.name = #r, .offset = offsetof(struct pt_regs, ARM_##r)}
>> +#define REG_OFFSET_END {.name = NULL, .offset = 0}
>> +
>> +const struct pt_regs_offset regs_offset_table[] = {
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x0),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x1),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x2),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x3),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x4),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x5),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x6),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x7),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x8),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x9),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x10),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x11),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x12),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x13),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x14),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x15),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x16),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x17),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x18),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x19),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x20),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x21),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x22),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x23),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x24),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x25),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x26),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x27),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x28),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x29),
>> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x30),
>
> Does this interact badly with perf tools, which expect to pass "lr" for
> x30? (see tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h).
>

Possibly, I can test that when I'm back from my short vacation this 
week.  The lr/x30 thing seems to be a recurring issue.  Perhaps it is 
best simply to add a reundant entry for x30 as "lr".  It's simple enough 
to do, although just slightly ugly looking as it would have to be done 
without a macro.  Would one ever use "x31" in place of "sp"?

Conversions in the other direction would have to use one or the other of 
course.

> Will
>

-dl

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c
  2015-08-11 18:00   ` Will Deacon
@ 2015-08-13  4:23     ` David Long
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-08-13  4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

On 08/11/15 14:00, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:39AM +0100, David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
>>
>> Certain instructions are hard to execute correctly out-of-line (as in
>> kprobes).  Test functions are added to insn.[hc] to identify these.  The
>> instructions include any that use PC-relative addressing, change the PC,
>> or change interrupt masking. For efficiency and simplicity test
>> functions are also added for small collections of related instructions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c      | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
>> index 30e50eb..66bfb21 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
>> @@ -223,8 +223,13 @@ static __always_inline bool aarch64_insn_is_##abbr(u32 code) \
>>   static __always_inline u32 aarch64_insn_get_##abbr##_value(void) \
>>   { return (val); }
>>
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(adr_adrp,	0x1F000000, 0x10000000)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(prfm_lit,	0xFF000000, 0xD8000000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(str_reg,	0x3FE0EC00, 0x38206800)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldr_reg,	0x3FE0EC00, 0x38606800)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldr_lit,	0xBF000000, 0x18000000)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldrsw_lit,	0xFF000000, 0x98000000)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(exclusive,	0x3F000000, 0x08000000)
>
> Hmm, so this class also pulls in load-acquire and store-release, which
> we *should* be able to single-step, no? Maybe it's worth splitting this
> category up (or at least changing aarch64_insn_is_exclusive to be more
> permissive).

I was not confident that this was the case. After reading the relevant 
parts of the v8 ARM yet again I think I see your point.

>
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(stp_post,	0x7FC00000, 0x28800000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ldp_post,	0x7FC00000, 0x28C00000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(stp_pre,	0x7FC00000, 0x29800000)
>> @@ -264,19 +269,29 @@ __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ands,	0x7F200000, 0x6A000000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(bics,	0x7F200000, 0x6A200000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(b,		0xFC000000, 0x14000000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(bl,	0xFC000000, 0x94000000)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(b_bl,	0x7C000000, 0x14000000)
>
> Why do we need this when we already have checks for b and bl?

I was trying to avoid doing multiple checks for different variants of 
similar instructions.

>
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(cb,	0x7E000000, 0x34000000)
>
> Likewise for cbz and cbnz...
>
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(cbz,	0x7F000000, 0x34000000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(cbnz,	0x7F000000, 0x35000000)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(tb,	0x7E000000, 0x36000000)
>
> ... there's a pattern here!
>

^^

>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(tbz,	0x7F000000, 0x36000000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(tbnz,	0x7F000000, 0x37000000)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(b_bl_cb_tb, 0x5C000000, 0x14000000)
>
> I must be missing something :)

^^

>
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(bcond,	0xFF000010, 0x54000000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(svc,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4000001)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(hvc,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4000002)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(smc,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4000003)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(brk,	0xFFE0001F, 0xD4200000)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(exception,	0xFF000000, 0xD4000000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(hint,	0xFFFFF01F, 0xD503201F)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(br,	0xFFFFFC1F, 0xD61F0000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(blr,	0xFFFFFC1F, 0xD63F0000)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(br_blr,	0xFFDFFC1F, 0xD61F0000)
>>   __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ret,	0xFFFFFC1F, 0xD65F0000)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(msr_imm,	0xFFF8F01F, 0xD500401F)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(msr_reg,	0xFFF00000, 0xD5100000)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(set_clr_daif, 0xFFFFF0DF, 0xD50340DF)
>> +__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(rd_wr_daif, 0xFFDFFFE0, 0xD51B4220)
>
> I think I'd rather have separate decoders to decode the register field
> of an mrs/msr instruction than overload each encoding here.
>
> Anyway, on the whole this looks pretty good, I'd just prefer not to build
> compound instruction checks at the encoding level (even though it looks
> like you did a good job on the values).
>

OK, easy enough to just add to the if statements where these are getting 
used.  May be getting a little bloated looking there though.

-dl


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support
  2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
  2015-08-12 13:37   ` Will Deacon
@ 2015-08-13 11:42   ` Steve Capper
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Steve Capper @ 2015-08-13 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Long
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	Sandeepa Prabhu, William Cohen, Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, David Miller, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

Hi David,

On 11 August 2015 at 01:52, David Long <dave.long@linaro.org> wrote:
> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
>
> Add support for basic kernel probes(kprobes) and jump probes
> (jprobes) for ARM64.
>
> Kprobes utilizes software breakpoint and single step debug
> exceptions supported on ARM v8.
>
> A software breakpoint is placed at the probe address to trap the
> kernel execution into the kprobe handler.
>
> ARM v8 supports enabling single stepping before the break exception
> return (ERET), with next PC in exception return address (ELR_EL1). The
> kprobe handler prepares an executable memory slot for out-of-line
> execution with a copy of the original instruction being probed, and
> enables single stepping. The PC is set to the out-of-line slot address
> before the ERET. With this scheme, the instruction is executed with the
> exact same register context except for the PC (and DAIF) registers.
>
> Debug mask (PSTATE.D) is enabled only when single stepping a recursive
> kprobe, e.g.: during kprobes reenter so that probed instruction can be
> single stepped within the kprobe handler -exception- context.
> The recursion depth of kprobe is always 2, i.e. upon probe re-entry,
> any further re-entry is prevented by not calling handlers and the case
> counted as a missed kprobe).
>
> Single stepping from the x-o-l slot has a drawback for PC-relative accesses
> like branching and symbolic literals access as the offset from the new PC
> (slot address) may not be ensured to fit in the immediate value of
> the opcode. Such instructions need simulation, so reject
> probing them.
>
> Instructions generating exceptions or cpu mode change are rejected
> for probing.
>
> Instructions using Exclusive Monitor are rejected too.
>
> System instructions are mostly enabled for stepping, except MSR/MRS
> accesses to "DAIF" flags in PSTATE, which are not safe for
> probing.
>
> Thanks to Steve Capper and Pratyush Anand for several suggested
> Changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>

Please remove my SoB, we can replace it with a Reviewed-by hopefully soon :-).


> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                      |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h |   5 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h        |  62 ++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h         |  50 +++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h         |   3 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile              |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c      |  35 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c       |  68 ++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h       |  28 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c             | 537 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h             |  24 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S         |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                   |  25 ++
>  13 files changed, 829 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
>

[...]

> +
> +void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +       struct kprobe *p, *cur;
> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
> +       unsigned long addr = instruction_pointer(regs);
> +
> +       kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> +       cur = kprobe_running();
> +
> +       p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *) addr);
> +
> +       if (p) {
> +               if (cur) {
> +                       if (reenter_kprobe(p, regs, kcb))
> +                               return;
> +               } else if (!p->ainsn.check_condn ||
> +                          p->ainsn.check_condn(p, regs)) {
> +                       /* Probe hit and conditional execution check ok. */
> +                       set_current_kprobe(p);
> +                       kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
> +
> +                       /*
> +                        * If we have no pre-handler or it returned 0, we
> +                        * continue with normal processing.  If we have a
> +                        * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it prepped
> +                        * for calling the break_handler below on re-entry,
> +                        * so get out doing nothing more here.
> +                        *
> +                        * pre_handler can hit a breakpoint and can step thru
> +                        * before return, keep PSTATE D-flag enabled until
> +                        * pre_handler return back.
> +                        */
> +                       if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs)) {
> +                               kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
> +                               setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
> +                               return;
> +                       }
> +               } else {
> +                       /*
> +                        * Breakpoint hit but conditional check failed,
> +                        * so just skip the instruction (NOP behaviour)
> +                        */
> +                       skip_singlestep_missed(kcb, regs);
> +                       return;

Sorry, I'm still unconvinced by this. :-(

I had a play with kprobes on my x86 box and my arm64 devboard running
this series.

On x86, I had the following two consecutive instructions from do_fork:

ffffffff810a0972:       f7 c7 00 00 80 00       test   $0x800000,%edi
ffffffff810a0978:       75 42                   jne
ffffffff810a09bc <do_fork+0x7c>

I had the kprobes set up as follows:
# cat kprobe_events
p:kprobes/probe1 0xffffffff810a0972
p:kprobes/probe2 0xffffffff810a0978

Now on my arm64 devboard in do_fork, I was interested in the following
two consecutive instructions:
ffffffc0000bbf54:       f9402ba1        ldr     x1, [x29,#80]
ffffffc0000bbf58:       37b80215        tbnz    w21, #23,
ffffffc0000bbf98 <_do_fork+0x80>

Which had kprobes set up thusly:
# cat kprobe_events
p:kprobes/armprobe1 0xffffffc0000bbf54
p:kprobes/armprobe2 0xffffffc0000bbf58

The last instruction in each pair corresponds to the same line of C
code in _do_fork:
"        if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_UNTRACED)) {"
So I would expect them to behave very similarly on both systems.

Now on x86, if I take a look at kprobe_profile:
# cat kprobe_profile
  probe1                                                    72               0
  probe2                                                    72               0

And for arm64:
# cat kprobe_profile
  armprobe1                                                 40               0
  armprobe2                                                  0               0

For both systems I would expect the counts of the two probes to be
identical as both instructions are "hit".
On x86 this appears to be the case, but not for arm64.

I know arm and arm64 are the same; but I do think their behaviour
should match x86 in this regard.
(i.e. I believe arm should be changed too).

Cheers,
--
Steve

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 1/7] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature
  2015-08-13  3:50     ` David Long
@ 2015-08-18  9:38       ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2015-08-18  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Long
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

Hi David,

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 04:50:40AM +0100, David Long wrote:
> On 08/11/15 13:31, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:38AM +0100, David Long wrote:
> >> +	REG_OFFSET_NAME(x30),
> >
> > Does this interact badly with perf tools, which expect to pass "lr" for
> > x30? (see tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h).
> >
> 
> Possibly, I can test that when I'm back from my short vacation this 
> week.  The lr/x30 thing seems to be a recurring issue.  Perhaps it is 
> best simply to add a reundant entry for x30 as "lr".  It's simple enough 
> to do, although just slightly ugly looking as it would have to be done 
> without a macro.  Would one ever use "x31" in place of "sp"?

No; "sp" should always be "sp". Let me know how you get on with perf. I
couldn't quite tie the two ends together, but it does look like it expects
"lr" to work.

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support
  2015-08-12 13:37   ` Will Deacon
@ 2015-12-08  6:05     ` David Long
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Long @ 2015-12-08  6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, William Cohen, Steve Capper,
	Jon Medhurst (Tixy),
	Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy, davem, Mark Brown, linux-kernel

On 08/12/15 09:37, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for the patch. Took me a while to get through it and I suspect
> I missed things, but comments inline all the same.
>

Sorry for the big delay in responding.  You did have a fair few 
questions though.  I'm still chasing down a couple answers.

> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:40AM +0100, David Long wrote:
>> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
>>
>> Add support for basic kernel probes(kprobes) and jump probes
>> (jprobes) for ARM64.
>>
>> Kprobes utilizes software breakpoint and single step debug
>> exceptions supported on ARM v8.
>>
>> A software breakpoint is placed at the probe address to trap the
>> kernel execution into the kprobe handler.
>>
>> ARM v8 supports enabling single stepping before the break exception
>> return (ERET), with next PC in exception return address (ELR_EL1). The
>> kprobe handler prepares an executable memory slot for out-of-line
>> execution with a copy of the original instruction being probed, and
>> enables single stepping. The PC is set to the out-of-line slot address
>> before the ERET. With this scheme, the instruction is executed with the
>> exact same register context except for the PC (and DAIF) registers.
>>
>> Debug mask (PSTATE.D) is enabled only when single stepping a recursive
>> kprobe, e.g.: during kprobes reenter so that probed instruction can be
>> single stepped within the kprobe handler -exception- context.
>> The recursion depth of kprobe is always 2, i.e. upon probe re-entry,
>> any further re-entry is prevented by not calling handlers and the case
>> counted as a missed kprobe).
>>
>> Single stepping from the x-o-l slot has a drawback for PC-relative accesses
>> like branching and symbolic literals access as the offset from the new PC
>> (slot address) may not be ensured to fit in the immediate value of
>> the opcode. Such instructions need simulation, so reject
>> probing them.
>>
>> Instructions generating exceptions or cpu mode change are rejected
>> for probing.
>>
>> Instructions using Exclusive Monitor are rejected too.
>>
>> System instructions are mostly enabled for stepping, except MSR/MRS
>> accesses to "DAIF" flags in PSTATE, which are not safe for
>> probing.
>
> I can imagine other MSR instructions that aren't safe for probing too
> For example, disabling the MMU. Maybe we should just blanket-ban these
> guys for now?
>

Yeah, done.

>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
>> index 40ec68a..92d7cea 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
>> @@ -90,6 +90,11 @@
>>
>>   #define CACHE_FLUSH_IS_SAFE            1
>>
>> +/* kprobes BRK opcodes with ESR encoding  */
>> +#define BRK64_ESR_MASK         0xFFFF
>> +#define BRK64_ESR_KPROBES      0x0004
>> +#define BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES   (AARCH64_BREAK_MON | (BRK64_ESR_KPROBES << 5))
>
> These are probably due some slight renaming with the BRK clean-up we've
> got queued for 4.3.

I've made a minor change that I think addresses this.

>
>>   /* AArch32 */
>>   #define DBG_ESR_EVT_BKPT       0x4
>>   #define DBG_ESR_EVT_VECC       0x5
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..af31c4d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
>> +/*
>> + * arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
>> + * General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _ARM_KPROBES_H
>> +#define _ARM_KPROBES_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
>> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
>> +
>> +#define __ARCH_WANT_KPROBES_INSN_SLOT
>> +#define MAX_INSN_SIZE                  1
>> +#define MAX_STACK_SIZE                 128
>> +
>> +#define flush_insn_slot(p)             do { } while (0)
>> +#define kretprobe_blacklist_size       0
>> +
>> +#include <asm/probes.h>
>> +
>> +struct prev_kprobe {
>> +       struct kprobe *kp;
>> +       unsigned int status;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Single step context for kprobe */
>> +struct kprobe_step_ctx {
>> +#define KPROBES_STEP_NONE      0x0
>> +#define KPROBES_STEP_PENDING   0x1
>> +       unsigned long ss_status;
>
> Why not bool ss_pending?
>

Presumably this was to allow for other possible states, which turned out 
to be uneeded.  I've changed it to a bool.

>> +       unsigned long match_addr;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* per-cpu kprobe control block */
>> +struct kprobe_ctlblk {
>> +       unsigned int kprobe_status;
>> +       unsigned long saved_irqflag;
>> +       struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
>> +       struct kprobe_step_ctx ss_ctx;
>> +       struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
>> +       char jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
>> +};
>> +
>> +void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *);
>> +int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr);
>> +int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>> +                            unsigned long val, void *data);
>> +int kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
>> +int kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
>> +
>> +#endif /* _ARM_KPROBES_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..7f5a27f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
>> +/*
>> + * arch/arm64/include/asm/probes.h
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
>> + * General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +#ifndef _ARM_PROBES_H
>> +#define _ARM_PROBES_H
>> +
>> +struct kprobe;
>> +struct arch_specific_insn;
>> +
>> +typedef u32 kprobe_opcode_t;
>> +typedef unsigned long (kprobes_pstate_check_t)(unsigned long);
>> +typedef unsigned long
>> +(probes_condition_check_t)(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *);
>> +typedef void
>> +(probes_prepare_t)(struct kprobe *, struct arch_specific_insn *);
>> +typedef void (kprobes_handler_t) (u32 opcode, long addr, struct pt_regs *);
>> +
>> +enum pc_restore_type {
>> +       NO_RESTORE,
>> +       RESTORE_PC,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct kprobe_pc_restore {
>> +       enum pc_restore_type type;
>> +       unsigned long addr;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* architecture specific copy of original instruction */
>> +struct arch_specific_insn {
>> +       kprobe_opcode_t *insn;
>> +       kprobes_pstate_check_t *pstate_cc;
>> +       probes_condition_check_t *check_condn;
>> +       probes_prepare_t *prepare;
>> +       kprobes_handler_t *handler;
>> +       /* restore address after step xol */
>> +       struct kprobe_pc_restore restore;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> index 8f440e9..aadf61a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> @@ -206,7 +206,8 @@ static inline int valid_user_regs(struct user_pt_regs *regs)
>>          return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> -#define instruction_pointer(regs)      ((unsigned long)(regs)->pc)
>> +#define instruction_pointer(regs)      ((regs)->pc)
>> +#define stack_pointer(regs)            ((regs)->sp)
>
> We already have kernel_stack_pointer (I think you added it in patch 1),
> so can't you just use that?
>

Yup, done.

>>   #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>>   extern unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
>> index 426d076..1319872 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_PM)            += sleep.o suspend.o
>>   arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)           += cpuidle.o
>>   arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)         += jump_label.o
>>   arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)               += kgdb.o
>> +arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES)            += kprobes.o kprobes-arm64.o
>>   arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)                        += efi.o efi-stub.o efi-entry.o
>>   arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)                        += pci.o
>>   arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARMV8_DEPRECATED)   += armv8_deprecated.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>> index b056369..486ee94 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/hardirq.h>
>>   #include <linux/init.h>
>>   #include <linux/ptrace.h>
>> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
>>   #include <linux/stat.h>
>>   #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>>
>> @@ -228,6 +229,7 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>>                                 struct pt_regs *regs)
>>   {
>>          siginfo_t info;
>> +       bool handler_found = false;
>>
>>          /*
>>           * If we are stepping a pending breakpoint, call the hw_breakpoint
>> @@ -251,15 +253,21 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>>                   */
>>                  user_rewind_single_step(current);
>>          } else {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
>> +               if (kprobe_single_step_handler(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
>> +                       handler_found = true;
>> +#endif
>>                  if (call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
>
> Is this because you need to called first? If so, maybe we could extend the
> step hook to take an optional priority and reject duplicate entries with
> the same value?
>

This is because I had a comment from Masami Hiramatsu (on Feb. 18) on 
the v5 version of the patches, explicitly recommending against using the 
general hook mechanism in that version of the patch.  It was stated that 
it could add a lot of unexpected dependencies, which might be probed 
code.  Locking code was of particular concern.

> Even then, it's not clear that you do always want to be called first. For
> example, if the instruction you're single-stepping in the x-o-l buffer
> triggers a hardware watchpoint, then you probably want to handle the
> watchpoint single-step exception before the kprobe.
>
>> -                       return 0;
>> -
>> -               pr_warning("Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1\n");
>> -               /*
>> -                * Re-enable stepping since we know that we will be
>> -                * returning to regs.
>> -                */
>> -               set_regs_spsr_ss(regs);
>> +                       handler_found = true;
>> +
>> +               if (!handler_found) {
>> +                       pr_warn("Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1\n");
>> +                       /*
>> +                        * Re-enable stepping since we know that we will be
>> +                        * returning to regs.
>> +                        */
>> +                       set_regs_spsr_ss(regs);
>> +               }
>>          }
>>
>>          return 0;
>> @@ -315,8 +323,15 @@ static int brk_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>>                  };
>>
>>                  force_sig_info(SIGTRAP, &info, current);
>> -       } else if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
>> -               pr_warning("Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1\n");
>> +       }
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
>> +       else if ((esr & BRK64_ESR_MASK) == BRK64_ESR_KPROBES) {
>> +               if (kprobe_breakpoint_handler(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
>> +                       return -EFAULT;
>> +       }
>> +#endif
>> +       else if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
>> +               pr_warn("Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1\n");
>
> Same here.
>

[ see above response ]

> Also, we now use BRK to implement BUG(), but I *think* that's ok because
> you reject kprobes on exception generating instructions.
>

Noted and agreed.

>>                  return -EFAULT;
>>          }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..f958c52
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
>> +/*
>> + * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
>> + * General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <asm/kprobes.h>
>> +#include <asm/insn.h>
>> +
>> +#include "kprobes-arm64.h"
>> +
>> +static bool __kprobes aarch64_insn_is_steppable(u32 insn)
>> +{
>> +       if (aarch64_get_insn_class(insn) == AARCH64_INSN_CLS_BR_SYS) {
>> +               if (aarch64_insn_is_branch(insn))
>> +                       return false;
>> +
>> +               /* modification of daif creates issues */
>> +               if (aarch64_insn_is_daif_access(insn))
>> +                       return false;
>> +
>> +               if (aarch64_insn_is_exception(insn))
>> +                       return false;
>> +
>> +               if (aarch64_insn_is_hint(insn))
>> +                       return aarch64_insn_is_nop(insn);
>> +
>> +               return true;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if (aarch64_insn_uses_literal(insn))
>> +               return false;
>> +
>> +       if (aarch64_insn_is_exclusive(insn))
>> +               return false;
>> +
>> +       return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return:
>> + *   INSN_REJECTED     If instruction is one not allowed to kprobe,
>> + *   INSN_GOOD         If instruction is supported and uses instruction slot,
>> + *   INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT If instruction is supported but doesn't use its slot.
>> + */
>> +enum kprobe_insn __kprobes
>> +arm_kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi)
>> +{
>> +       /*
>> +        * Instructions reading or modifying the PC won't work from the XOL
>> +        * slot.
>> +        */
>> +       if (aarch64_insn_is_steppable(insn))
>> +               return INSN_GOOD;
>> +       else
>> +               return INSN_REJECTED;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..87e7891
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
>> +/*
>> + * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.h
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
>> + * General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_ARM64_H
>> +#define _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_ARM64_H
>> +
>> +enum kprobe_insn {
>> +       INSN_REJECTED,
>> +       INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT,
>> +       INSN_GOOD,
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum kprobe_insn __kprobes
>> +arm_kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi);
>> +
>> +#endif /* _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_ARM64_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..601d2c6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,537 @@
>> +/*
>> + * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>> + *
>> + * Kprobes support for ARM64
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
>> + * Author: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
>> + * General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
>> +#include <linux/stringify.h>
>> +#include <asm/traps.h>
>> +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>> +#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
>> +#include <asm/system_misc.h>
>> +#include <asm/insn.h>
>> +
>> +#include "kprobes.h"
>> +#include "kprobes-arm64.h"
>> +
>> +#define MIN_STACK_SIZE(addr)   min((unsigned long)MAX_STACK_SIZE,      \
>> +       (unsigned long)current_thread_info() + THREAD_START_SP - (addr))
>
> You can avoid the cast by using task_stack_page(current).
>

That looks like it returns a pointer to a struct instead of the needed 
integer value.

> That said, I don't fully understand what this is for. Given that we don't
> probe the exception text, we should always have at least MAX_STACK_SIZE
> pushed on the stack thanks to the pt_regs structure, so when does this
> condition ever evaluate to something less?
>

Looks like this is borrowed from the x86 code. The end purpose is to 
save the saved stack while running a jprobe handler, so the real 
jprobe'd function then gets uncorrupted data (e.g.: from callee-owned 
parameters passed on the stack).  I think the goal of the define is to 
ensure we don't memcpy more of the relevant stack than actually exists 
at this point.

>> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
>> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
>> +{
>> +       /* prepare insn slot */
>> +       p->ainsn.insn[0] = p->opcode;
>> +
>> +       flush_icache_range((uintptr_t) (p->ainsn.insn),
>> +                          (uintptr_t) (p->ainsn.insn) + MAX_INSN_SIZE);
>
> Hmm, is this right? MAX_INSN_SIZE is 1, so I don't think you're flushing
> enough (but in reality you'll flush a whole cacheline and get away with
> it).
>

Yes, fixed.

>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * Needs restoring of return address after stepping xol.
>> +        */
>> +       p->ainsn.restore.addr = (unsigned long) p->addr +
>> +         sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
>> +       p->ainsn.restore.type = RESTORE_PC;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>> +{
>> +       kprobe_opcode_t insn;
>> +       unsigned long probe_addr = (unsigned long)p->addr;
>
> x86 has some complications to deal with multiple kprobes on the same
> address afaict. Do we care about that at all?
>

I think basic kprobes handles that all in architecture-independent code. 
Are you referring to the kretprobe trampoline handler's searching of the 
list of recursive kretprobes to find the real return address?  That code 
lives in trampoline_probe_handler() in patch #6 of this series.

>> +       /* copy instruction */
>> +       insn = *p->addr;
>
> Instructions are always little-endian, so I think you need an le32_to_cpu
> here to work on a big-endian kernel. I suspect you may have a few other
> endianness bugs lurking, so it would be worth testing this in big-endian
> (you can run a big-endian kvm guest easily enough under kvmtool).
>

OK.  I found a couple more cases.  I have been getting some help testing 
this on real hardware (although more help would be good).

>> +       p->opcode = insn;
>> +
>> +       if (in_exception_text(probe_addr))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       /* decode instruction */
>> +       switch (arm_kprobe_decode_insn(insn, &p->ainsn)) {
>> +       case INSN_REJECTED:     /* insn not supported */
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       case INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT: /* insn need simulation */
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       case INSN_GOOD: /* instruction uses slot */
>> +               p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
>> +               if (!p->ainsn.insn)
>> +                       return -ENOMEM;
>> +               break;
>> +       };
>> +
>> +       /* prepare the instruction */
>> +       arch_prepare_ss_slot(p);
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __kprobes patch_text(kprobe_opcode_t *addr, u32 opcode)
>> +{
>> +       void *addrs[1];
>> +       u32 insns[1];
>> +
>> +       addrs[0] = (void *)addr;
>> +       insns[0] = (u32)opcode;
>> +
>> +       return aarch64_insn_patch_text_sync(addrs, insns, 1);
>
> Any reason not to use aarch64_insn_patch_text here?
>

If I understand this correctly then, no.  I've made the change.

>> +}
>> +
>> +/* arm kprobe: install breakpoint in text */
>> +void __kprobes arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>> +{
>> +       patch_text(p->addr, BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* disarm kprobe: remove breakpoint from text */
>> +void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>> +{
>> +       patch_text(p->addr, p->opcode);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>> +{
>> +       if (p->ainsn.insn) {
>> +               free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.insn, 0);
>> +               p->ainsn.insn = NULL;
>> +       }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
>> +{
>> +       kcb->prev_kprobe.kp = kprobe_running();
>> +       kcb->prev_kprobe.status = kcb->kprobe_status;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes restore_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
>> +{
>> +       __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, kcb->prev_kprobe.kp);
>> +       kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe.status;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>> +{
>> +       __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The D-flag (Debug mask) is set (masked) upon exception entry.
>
> To avoid confusing the casual reader, can we specify that we're talking
> about *debug* exception entry, please?
>

OK

>> + * Kprobes needs to clear (unmask) D-flag -ONLY- in case of recursive
>> + * probe i.e. when probe hit from kprobe handler context upon
>> + * executing the pre/post handlers. In this case we return with
>> + * D-flag clear so that single-stepping can be carried-out.
>> + *
>> + * Leave D-flag set in all other cases.
>> + */
>> +static void __kprobes
>> +spsr_set_debug_flag(struct pt_regs *regs, int mask)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned long spsr = regs->pstate;
>> +
>> +       if (mask)
>> +               spsr |= PSR_D_BIT;
>> +       else
>> +               spsr &= ~PSR_D_BIT;
>> +
>> +       regs->pstate = spsr;
>> +}
>
> This continues to melt my brain, but I think it's the right thing to do
> as long as the krpobes recursion is bound (as you stated in the commit
> log).
>

It always takes me a while to get the whole exception/interrupt 
processing scenario straight in my head when I return to thinking about 
it.  Glad I'm not the only one.  Many thanks again to William Cohen for 
his contributions to this.

>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Interrupts need to be disabled before single-step mode is set, and not
>> + * reenabled until after single-step mode ends.
>> + * Without disabling interrupt on local CPU, there is a chance of
>> + * interrupt occurrence in the period of exception return and  start of
>> + * out-of-line single-step, that result in wrongly single stepping
>> + * the interrupt handler.
>
> *into* the interrupt handler.
>

Fixed.

> Curious: what happens if the instruction aborts for some other reason?
> I assume we forbid probing copy_from_user etc?
>

I will test this.

>> + */
>> +static void __kprobes kprobes_save_local_irqflag(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> +
>> +       kcb->saved_irqflag = regs->pstate;
>> +       regs->pstate |= PSR_I_BIT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> +
>> +       if (kcb->saved_irqflag & PSR_I_BIT)
>> +               regs->pstate |= PSR_I_BIT;
>> +       else
>> +               regs->pstate &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes
>> +set_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
>> +{
>> +       kcb->ss_ctx.ss_status = KPROBES_STEP_PENDING;
>> +       kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = addr + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes clear_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
>> +{
>> +       kcb->ss_ctx.ss_status = KPROBES_STEP_NONE;
>> +       kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes
>> +skip_singlestep_missed(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +       /* set return addr to next pc to continue */
>> +       instruction_pointer(regs) += sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes setup_singlestep(struct kprobe *p,
>> +                                      struct pt_regs *regs,
>> +                                      struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, int reenter)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned long slot;
>> +
>> +       if (reenter) {
>> +               save_previous_kprobe(kcb);
>> +               set_current_kprobe(p);
>> +               kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_REENTER;
>> +       } else {
>> +               kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if (p->ainsn.insn) {
>> +               /* prepare for single stepping */
>> +               slot = (unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn;
>> +
>> +               set_ss_context(kcb, slot);      /* mark pending ss */
>> +
>> +               if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
>> +                       spsr_set_debug_flag(regs, 0);
>> +
>> +               /* IRQs and single stepping do not mix well. */
>> +               kprobes_save_local_irqflag(regs);
>> +               kernel_enable_single_step(regs);
>> +               instruction_pointer(regs) = slot;
>
> Have you tried this with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA=y? I'm not sure that the
> buffer will be executable in that case.
>

I tested this on 4.3-rc2 and setting DEBUG_RODATA did not change 
anything. Kprobe's are processed correctly.

>> +       } else  {
>> +               BUG();
>> +       }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __kprobes reenter_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
>> +                                   struct pt_regs *regs,
>> +                                   struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
>> +{
>> +       switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
>> +       case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
>> +       case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
>> +               if (!p->ainsn.check_condn || p->ainsn.check_condn(p, regs)) {
>> +                       kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
>> +                       setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 1);
>> +               } else  {
>> +                       /* condition check failed, skip stepping */
>> +                       skip_singlestep_missed(kcb, regs);
>> +               }
>> +               break;
>> +       case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
>> +       case KPROBE_REENTER:
>> +               pr_warn("Unrecoverable kprobe detected at %p.\n", p->addr);
>> +               dump_kprobe(p);
>> +               BUG();
>> +               break;
>> +       default:
>> +               WARN_ON(1);
>> +               return 0;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes
>> +post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +       struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
>> +
>> +       if (!cur)
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       /* return addr restore if non-branching insn */
>> +       if (cur->ainsn.restore.type == RESTORE_PC) {
>> +               instruction_pointer(regs) = cur->ainsn.restore.addr;
>> +               if (!instruction_pointer(regs))
>> +                       BUG();
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /* restore back original saved kprobe variables and continue */
>> +       if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER) {
>> +               restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
>> +               return;
>> +       }
>> +       /* call post handler */
>> +       kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE;
>> +       if (cur->post_handler)  {
>> +               /* post_handler can hit breakpoint and single step
>> +                * again, so we enable D-flag for recursive exception.
>> +                */
>> +               cur->post_handler(cur, regs, 0);
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       reset_current_kprobe();
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr)
>> +{
>> +       struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
>> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> +
>> +       switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
>> +       case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
>> +       case KPROBE_REENTER:
>> +               /*
>> +                * We are here because the instruction being single
>> +                * stepped caused a page fault. We reset the current
>> +                * kprobe and the ip points back to the probe address
>> +                * and allow the page fault handler to continue as a
>> +                * normal page fault.
>> +                */
>> +               instruction_pointer(regs) = (unsigned long)cur->addr;
>> +               if (!instruction_pointer(regs))
>> +                       BUG();
>> +               if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
>> +                       restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
>> +               else
>> +                       reset_current_kprobe();
>> +
>> +               break;
>> +       case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
>> +       case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
>> +               /*
>> +                * We increment the nmissed count for accounting,
>> +                * we can also use npre/npostfault count for accounting
>> +                * these specific fault cases.
>> +                */
>> +               kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(cur);
>> +
>> +               /*
>> +                * We come here because instructions in the pre/post
>> +                * handler caused the page_fault, this could happen
>> +                * if handler tries to access user space by
>> +                * copy_from_user(), get_user() etc. Let the
>> +                * user-specified handler try to fix it first.
>> +                */
>> +               if (cur->fault_handler && cur->fault_handler(cur, regs, fsr))
>> +                       return 1;
>> +
>> +               /*
>> +                * In case the user-specified fault handler returned
>> +                * zero, try to fix up.
>> +                */
>> +               if (fixup_exception(regs))
>> +                       return 1;
>
> Won't this get dealt with in do_page_fault if we just return 1? (i.e.
> __do_kernel_fault would get called, which would then call fixup_exception).
>

I will experiment with this.

>> +
>> +               break;
>> +       }
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>> +                                      unsigned long val, void *data)
>> +{
>> +       return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> static? (or inline into kprobe_breakpoint_handler)
>

I made it static.

>> +{
>> +       struct kprobe *p, *cur;
>> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
>> +       unsigned long addr = instruction_pointer(regs);
>> +
>> +       kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> +       cur = kprobe_running();
>
> I keep getting this confused with current. Can you give it a better name
> please?
>

I changed it to cur_kprobe.  Hopefully that's less confusing.

>> +
>> +       p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *) addr);
>> +
>> +       if (p) {
>> +               if (cur) {
>> +                       if (reenter_kprobe(p, regs, kcb))
>> +                               return;
>> +               } else if (!p->ainsn.check_condn ||
>> +                          p->ainsn.check_condn(p, regs)) {
>> +                       /* Probe hit and conditional execution check ok. */
>> +                       set_current_kprobe(p);
>> +                       kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
>> +
>> +                       /*
>> +                        * If we have no pre-handler or it returned 0, we
>> +                        * continue with normal processing.  If we have a
>> +                        * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it prepped
>> +                        * for calling the break_handler below on re-entry,
>> +                        * so get out doing nothing more here.
>> +                        *
>> +                        * pre_handler can hit a breakpoint and can step thru
>> +                        * before return, keep PSTATE D-flag enabled until
>> +                        * pre_handler return back.
>> +                        */
>> +                       if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs)) {
>> +                               kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
>> +                               setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
>> +                               return;
>> +                       }
>> +               } else {
>> +                       /*
>> +                        * Breakpoint hit but conditional check failed,
>> +                        * so just skip the instruction (NOP behaviour)
>> +                        */
>> +                       skip_singlestep_missed(kcb, regs);
>
> Why is this necessary? (i.e. why doesn't the condition get honoured
> during the single-step?).
>

I believe this was primarily to prevent recording of an event when the 
instruction is not executed due to the CC.  There is some recent debate, 
though, as to whether that is the desired behavior.  It matches the 
32-bit ARM behavior, so the issue ultimately could involve changing the 
behavior of existing 32-bit ARM code.

>> +                       return;
>> +               }
>> +       } else if (*(kprobe_opcode_t *) addr != BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES) {
>> +               /*
>> +                * The breakpoint instruction was removed right
>> +                * after we hit it.  Another cpu has removed
>> +                * either a probepoint or a debugger breakpoint
>> +                * at this address.  In either case, no further
>> +                * handling of this interrupt is appropriate.
>> +                * Return back to original instruction, and continue.
>> +                */
>> +               return;
>> +       } else if (cur) {
>> +               /* We probably hit a jprobe.  Call its break handler. */
>> +               if (cur->break_handler && cur->break_handler(cur, regs)) {
>> +                       kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
>> +                       setup_singlestep(cur, regs, kcb, 0);
>> +                       return;
>> +               }
>> +       } else {
>> +               /* breakpoint is removed, now in a race
>> +                * Return back to original instruction & continue.
>> +                */
>
> Can you tidy this up by combining the "do nothing" case with the
> "*(kprobe_opcode_t *) addr != BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES" case?
>

Done.

>> +       }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __kprobes
>> +kprobe_ss_hit(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
>> +{
>> +       if ((kcb->ss_ctx.ss_status == KPROBES_STEP_PENDING)
>> +           && (kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr == addr)) {
>> +               clear_ss_context(kcb);  /* clear pending ss */
>> +               return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
>> +       }
>> +       /* not ours, kprobes should ignore it */
>> +       return DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __kprobes
>> +kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
>> +{
>> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> +       int retval;
>> +
>> +       /* return error if this is not our step */
>> +       retval = kprobe_ss_hit(kcb, instruction_pointer(regs));
>> +
>> +       if (retval == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
>> +               kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(regs);
>> +               kernel_disable_single_step();
>> +
>> +               if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
>> +                       spsr_set_debug_flag(regs, 1);
>> +
>> +               post_kprobe_handler(kcb, regs);
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return retval;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __kprobes
>> +kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
>> +{
>> +       kprobe_handler(regs);
>> +       return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __kprobes setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +       struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
>> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> +       long stack_ptr = stack_pointer(regs);
>> +
>> +       kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs;
>> +       memcpy(kcb->jprobes_stack, (void *)stack_ptr,
>> +              MIN_STACK_SIZE(stack_ptr));
>> +
>> +       instruction_pointer(regs) = (long)jp->entry;
>> +       preempt_disable();
>> +       return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __kprobes jprobe_return(void)
>> +{
>> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * Jprobe handler return by entering break exception,
>> +        * encoded same as kprobe, but with following conditions
>> +        * -a magic number in x0 to identify from rest of other kprobes.
>> +        * -restore stack addr to original saved pt_regs
>> +        */
>> +       asm volatile ("ldr x0, [%0]\n\t"
>> +                     "mov sp, x0\n\t"
>> +                     "ldr x0, =" __stringify(JPROBES_MAGIC_NUM) "\n\t"
>
> This feels flakey to me and I worry that we could end up invoking the
> jprobe_return handler thanks to a kprobe with the right "magic" value in
> x0 and a race with the kprobe getting removed.
>
> Why can't we do what x86 does and check the originating PC falls inside
> the return code?

I've changed the code to test for the saved pc being equal to the 
location of the "brk" instruction in jprobe_return(), and ripped out 
JPROBES_MAGIC_NUM.

>
>> +                     "BRK %1\n\t"
>> +                     "NOP\n\t"
>
> No need to capitalise these two instructions. Also, what's the nop for?
>

OK.  The nop is probably leftover from concerns about prefetching 
causing issues.  I removed nop's from the original kprobes xol code 
after feedback (from you I think). Not sure now if that was for arm or 
arm64.  At any rate, I've removed this nop.

>> +                     :
>> +                     : "r"(&kcb->jprobe_saved_regs.sp),
>
> Why do you need to do this indirectly? (as opposed to just moving straight
> to sp).

I don't see how you can load the sp directly, it's not a valid target of 
a ldr instruction.

>
>> +                     "I"(BRK64_ESR_KPROBES)
>> +                     : "memory");
>
> unreachable()?
>

Not sure what the complaint is here.  I don't think there's any code 
after the break, except probably an unreachable return the compiler 
adds.  Am I missing something?

>> +}
>> +
>> +int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> +       long stack_addr = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs.sp;
>> +       long orig_sp = stack_pointer(regs);
>> +       struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
>> +
>> +       if (regs->regs[0] == JPROBES_MAGIC_NUM) {
>
> Change the polarity with early return and lose a level of indentation below.
>

Done.

>> +               if (orig_sp != stack_addr) {
>> +                       struct pt_regs *saved_regs =
>> +                           (struct pt_regs *)kcb->jprobe_saved_regs.sp;
>> +                       pr_err("current sp %lx does not match saved sp %lx\n",
>> +                              orig_sp, stack_addr);
>> +                       pr_err("Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
>> +                       show_regs(saved_regs);
>> +                       pr_err("Current registers\n");
>> +                       show_regs(regs);
>> +                       BUG();
>> +               }
>> +               *regs = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
>> +               memcpy((void *)stack_addr, kcb->jprobes_stack,
>> +                      MIN_STACK_SIZE(stack_addr));
>> +               preempt_enable_no_resched();
>> +               return 1;
>> +       }
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __init arch_init_kprobes(void)
>> +{
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e98ad60
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>> +/*
>> + * arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
>> + * General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_H
>> +#define _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_H
>> +
>> +#define JPROBES_MAGIC_NUM      0xa5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5
>> +
>> +/* Move this out to appropriate header file */
>> +int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> +
>> +#endif /* _ARM_KERNEL_KPROBES_H */
>
> I don't think this warrants an extra header. Use uaccess.h and stick
> the magic number somewhere else if you still need it.

I've moved the define to kprobes-arm64.h and removed the new include 
file. I added an explicit #include of asm/uaccess.h to get it to 
successfully compile again.

>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>> index 9807333..1fa6adc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ SECTIONS
>>                          TEXT_TEXT
>>                          SCHED_TEXT
>>                          LOCK_TEXT
>> +                       KPROBES_TEXT
>>                          HYPERVISOR_TEXT
>>                          IDMAP_TEXT
>>                          *(.fixup)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> index 94d98cd..01bf525 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,28 @@
>>
>>   static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
>> +static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
>> +{
>
> The function name isn't very descriptive. Why not follow x86 with
> "kprobes_fault"?

I'm guessing the original author followed other exmaples.  7 of 8 
architectures name it notify_page_fault, x86 is the only one that uses 
kprobes_fault.  Do we still feel it's better to follow the x86 example, 
or is it better to stick with the majority example?

>
>> +       int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +       /* kprobe_running() needs smp_processor_id() */
>
> But we could already be running on a different core from the one that
> triggered the fault, so isn't this racy?
>

This code looks the same on x86, arm, and probably other platforms. 
Wouldn't one of those have shown a problem if this was an issue?

>> +       if (!user_mode(regs)) {
>> +               preempt_disable();
>> +               if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, esr))
>> +                       ret = 1;
>> +               preempt_enable();
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
>
> Will
>

-dl

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-08  6:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-11  0:52 [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
2015-08-11 17:31   ` Will Deacon
2015-08-13  3:50     ` David Long
2015-08-18  9:38       ` Will Deacon
2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c David Long
2015-08-11 18:00   ` Will Deacon
2015-08-13  4:23     ` David Long
2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
2015-08-12 13:37   ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08  6:05     ` David Long
2015-08-13 11:42   ` Steve Capper
2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support David Long
2015-08-12 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] arm64: Add trampoline code for kretprobes David Long
2015-08-12 14:47   ` Will Deacon
2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes) David Long
2015-08-11  0:52 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module David Long
2015-08-12 16:22   ` Steve Capper
2015-08-11 16:56 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support Will Deacon
2015-08-11 17:03   ` David Long
2015-08-11 17:36     ` Will Deacon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).