linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, <felipe.franciosi@citrix.com>,
	<axboe@fb.com>, <hch@infradead.org>, <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>,
	<rafal.mielniczuk@citrix.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	<jonathan.davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] xen/blkback: separate ring information out of struct xen_blkif
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:55:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56128F54.1090907@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441456782-31318-8-git-send-email-bob.liu@oracle.com>

El 05/09/15 a les 14.39, Bob Liu ha escrit:
> Split per ring information to an new structure:xen_blkif_ring, so that one vbd
> device can associate with one or more rings/hardware queues.
> 
> This patch is a preparation for supporting multi hardware queues/rings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c |  365 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h  |   52 +++--
>  drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c  |  130 +++++++------
>  3 files changed, 295 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
> index 954c002..fd02240 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
> @@ -113,71 +113,71 @@ module_param(log_stats, int, 0644);
>  /* Number of free pages to remove on each call to gnttab_free_pages */
>  #define NUM_BATCH_FREE_PAGES 10
>  
> -static inline int get_free_page(struct xen_blkif *blkif, struct page **page)
> +static inline int get_free_page(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring, struct page **page)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&blkif->free_pages_lock, flags);
> -	if (list_empty(&blkif->free_pages)) {
> -		BUG_ON(blkif->free_pages_num != 0);
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkif->free_pages_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->free_pages_lock, flags);
> +	if (list_empty(&ring->free_pages)) {

I'm afraid the pool of free pages should be per-device, not per-ring.

> +		BUG_ON(ring->free_pages_num != 0);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->free_pages_lock, flags);
>  		return gnttab_alloc_pages(1, page);
>  	}
> -	BUG_ON(blkif->free_pages_num == 0);
> -	page[0] = list_first_entry(&blkif->free_pages, struct page, lru);
> +	BUG_ON(ring->free_pages_num == 0);
> +	page[0] = list_first_entry(&ring->free_pages, struct page, lru);
>  	list_del(&page[0]->lru);
> -	blkif->free_pages_num--;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkif->free_pages_lock, flags);
> +	ring->free_pages_num--;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->free_pages_lock, flags);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void put_free_pages(struct xen_blkif *blkif, struct page **page,
> +static inline void put_free_pages(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring, struct page **page,
>                                    int num)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&blkif->free_pages_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->free_pages_lock, flags);
>  	for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> -		list_add(&page[i]->lru, &blkif->free_pages);
> -	blkif->free_pages_num += num;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkif->free_pages_lock, flags);
> +		list_add(&page[i]->lru, &ring->free_pages);
> +	ring->free_pages_num += num;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->free_pages_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void shrink_free_pagepool(struct xen_blkif *blkif, int num)
> +static inline void shrink_free_pagepool(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring, int num)
>  {
>  	/* Remove requested pages in batches of NUM_BATCH_FREE_PAGES */
>  	struct page *page[NUM_BATCH_FREE_PAGES];
>  	unsigned int num_pages = 0;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&blkif->free_pages_lock, flags);
> -	while (blkif->free_pages_num > num) {
> -		BUG_ON(list_empty(&blkif->free_pages));
> -		page[num_pages] = list_first_entry(&blkif->free_pages,
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->free_pages_lock, flags);
> +	while (ring->free_pages_num > num) {
> +		BUG_ON(list_empty(&ring->free_pages));
> +		page[num_pages] = list_first_entry(&ring->free_pages,
>  		                                   struct page, lru);
>  		list_del(&page[num_pages]->lru);
> -		blkif->free_pages_num--;
> +		ring->free_pages_num--;
>  		if (++num_pages == NUM_BATCH_FREE_PAGES) {
> -			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkif->free_pages_lock, flags);
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->free_pages_lock, flags);
>  			gnttab_free_pages(num_pages, page);
> -			spin_lock_irqsave(&blkif->free_pages_lock, flags);
> +			spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->free_pages_lock, flags);
>  			num_pages = 0;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkif->free_pages_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->free_pages_lock, flags);
>  	if (num_pages != 0)
>  		gnttab_free_pages(num_pages, page);
>  }
>  
>  #define vaddr(page) ((unsigned long)pfn_to_kaddr(page_to_pfn(page)))
>  
> -static int do_block_io_op(struct xen_blkif *blkif);
> -static int dispatch_rw_block_io(struct xen_blkif *blkif,
> +static int do_block_io_op(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring);
> +static int dispatch_rw_block_io(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring,
>  				struct blkif_request *req,
>  				struct pending_req *pending_req);
> -static void make_response(struct xen_blkif *blkif, u64 id,
> +static void make_response(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring, u64 id,
>  			  unsigned short op, int st);
>  
>  #define foreach_grant_safe(pos, n, rbtree, node) \
> @@ -198,19 +198,19 @@ static void make_response(struct xen_blkif *blkif, u64 id,
>   * bit operations to modify the flags of a persistent grant and to count
>   * the number of used grants.
>   */
> -static int add_persistent_gnt(struct xen_blkif *blkif,
> +static int add_persistent_gnt(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring,
>  			       struct persistent_gnt *persistent_gnt)
>  {
>  	struct rb_node **new = NULL, *parent = NULL;
>  	struct persistent_gnt *this;
>  
> -	if (blkif->persistent_gnt_c >= xen_blkif_max_pgrants) {
> -		if (!blkif->vbd.overflow_max_grants)
> -			blkif->vbd.overflow_max_grants = 1;
> +	if (ring->persistent_gnt_c >= xen_blkif_max_pgrants) {
> +		if (!ring->blkif->vbd.overflow_max_grants)
> +			ring->blkif->vbd.overflow_max_grants = 1;

The same for the pool of persistent grants, it should be per-device and
not per-ring.

And I think this issue is far worse than the others, because a frontend
might use a persistent grant on different queues, forcing the backend
map the grant several times for each queue, this is not acceptable IMO.

Roger.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-05 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-05 12:39 [PATCH v3 0/9] xen-block: support multi hardware-queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] xen-blkfront: convert to blk-mq APIs Bob Liu
2015-09-23 20:31   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-23 21:12     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] xen-block: add document for mutli hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-09-23 20:32   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-10-02 16:04   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-02 16:12     ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2015-10-02 16:22       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-02 23:55         ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] xen/blkfront: separate per ring information out of device info Bob Liu
2015-10-02 17:02   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-03  0:34     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:17       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-10  8:30     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-19  9:42       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] xen/blkfront: pseudo support for multi hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-10-05 10:52   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:28     ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] xen/blkfront: convert per device io_lock to per ring ring_lock Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:13   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:34     ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] xen/blkfront: negotiate the number of hw queues/rings with backend Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:40   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:39     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 11:46       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 12:19         ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] xen/blkback: separate ring information out of struct xen_blkif Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:55   ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2015-10-07 10:41     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-10  4:08     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-19  9:36       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-19 10:03         ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:55   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] xen/blkback: pseudo support for multi hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:08   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:50     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 11:49       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] xen/blkback: get number of hardware queues/rings from blkfront Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:15   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:54     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-02  9:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] xen-block: support multi hardware-queues/rings Rafal Mielniczuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56128F54.1090907@citrix.com \
    --to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=felipe.franciosi@citrix.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafal.mielniczuk@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).