Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA management driver

From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
	Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
	"jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA management driver
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:20:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56378D38.9050509@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+XCkaPD_Bop_BaTfEVP2YuOQ+=ChFvyLN47jps2NcZSA@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/2/2015 10:57 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Please make this more specific. It doesn't match your example either.
> Unless "1.0" type versioning is tightly controlled and defined,
> version numbers are usually not a good practice.
Is there a good example I can look or a wiki about the device-tree 
naming conventions?

I'm more of an ACPI person than DTS.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a 
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project