* [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel @ 2015-11-05 11:47 Laurent Vivier 2015-11-06 21:09 ` Scott Wood 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Laurent Vivier @ 2015-11-05 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: benh, paulus; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Laurent Vivier When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel on a ppc64 host. VDSO64L fails: VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong format This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the first object as output format. As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the VDSO objects. Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile index effca94..618c420 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ $(obj-vdso64): %.o: %.S # actual build commands quiet_cmd_vdso64ld = VDSO64L $@ - cmd_vdso64ld = $(CC) $(c_flags) -Wl,-T $^ -o $@ + cmd_vdso64ld = $(LD) $(LDFLAGS) $(ldflags-y) -T $^ -o $@ quiet_cmd_vdso64as = VDSO64A $@ cmd_vdso64as = $(CC) $(a_flags) -c -o $@ $< -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-05 11:47 [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel Laurent Vivier @ 2015-11-06 21:09 ` Scott Wood 2015-11-06 22:22 ` Laurent Vivier ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Scott Wood @ 2015-11-06 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Vivier; +Cc: benh, paulus, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: > When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally > fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- > compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel > on a ppc64 host. > > VDSO64L fails: > > VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg > /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: > file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 > /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong format > > This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with > "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the > "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the > first object as output format. > > As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel > objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the > VDSO objects. I cross-compile ppc64 kernels and have not seen this problem. I do need to pass in -m64 as part of $(CC) if it's not the toolchain default, which is not nice, but the proper fix for that is to add -m64 in the makefiles -- and if I don't it fails way before VDSO. Why is GCC building ppc64 object files but telling the linker --oformat elf32- powerpcle? Are different options somehow being passed to GCC in one case versus the other? -Scott ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-06 21:09 ` Scott Wood @ 2015-11-06 22:22 ` Laurent Vivier 2015-11-06 23:24 ` Scott Wood 2015-11-06 22:55 ` Segher Boessenkool 2015-11-06 23:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Laurent Vivier @ 2015-11-06 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Scott Wood; +Cc: benh, paulus, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel Le 06/11/2015 22:09, Scott Wood a écrit : > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally >> fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- >> compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel >> on a ppc64 host. >> >> VDSO64L fails: >> >> VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg >> /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: >> file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 >> /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong format >> >> This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with >> "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the >> "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the >> first object as output format. >> >> As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel >> objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the >> VDSO objects. > > I cross-compile ppc64 kernels and have not seen this problem. I do need to > pass in -m64 as part of $(CC) if it's not the toolchain default, which is not > nice, but the proper fix for that is to add -m64 in the makefiles -- and if I > don't it fails way before VDSO. > > Why is GCC building ppc64 object files but telling the linker --oformat elf32- > powerpcle? Are different options somehow being passed to GCC in one case > versus the other? In fact, for all the other parts of the kernel, gcc is called with "-mlittle-endian -m64", ld with "-EL -m elf64lppc", and thus generates the good objects and calls ld with the good options ("elf64lppc"). I think gcc is never used to link, only to compile. This, I think, comes from: arch/powerpc/Makefile: ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN),y) override CC += -mlittle-endian override LD += -EL ... ifeq ($(HAS_BIARCH),y) override CC += -m$(CONFIG_WORD_SIZE) override LD += -m elf$(CONFIG_WORD_SIZE)$(LDEMULATION) But in the case of vdso64, ld command is gcc: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/Makefile: cmd_vdso64ld = $(CC) $(c_flags) -Wl,-T $^ -o $@ So to link, we use "gcc -mlittle-endian -m64" and strace of "gcc -mlittle-endian -m64" gives me: "/usr/libexec/gcc/ppc64-redhat-linux/5.1.1/collect2", [ ... "--oformat", "elf32-powerpcle", "-m", "elf64lppc",... So the format used to link is by default "elf32-powerpcle" (with the emulation elf64lppc given by "-mlittle-endian -m64", I agree it seems strange). I think this is coming from the configuration of my gcc, "-dumpspecs" gives me: *link_target: %{mlittle|mlittle-endian: --oformat elf32-powerpcle;mbig|mbig-endian:;mcall-i960-old: --oformat elf32-powerpcle;:} When "ld" is called without "--oformat" it takes the format of the first processed object ("elf64-powerpcle" in our case, it's why it works for the other binaries of the kernel). So at this point, I can: 1- either fix my compiler, 2- or fix the vdso64 linker command. As all the others objects of the kernel are generated and linked correctly with this build env, there is no reason to not choose 2- as 1- is much more complex (at leasts for me = rebuild gcc whereas I just want to build the kernel). But, more generally, what I'm wondering is why we are using CC instead of LD to link objects... Laurent ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-06 22:22 ` Laurent Vivier @ 2015-11-06 23:24 ` Scott Wood 2015-11-07 11:35 ` Laurent Vivier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Scott Wood @ 2015-11-06 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Vivier; +Cc: benh, paulus, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 23:22 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 06/11/2015 22:09, Scott Wood a écrit : > > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally > > > fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- > > > compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel > > > on a ppc64 host. > > > > > > VDSO64L fails: > > > > > > VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg > > > /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: > > > file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 > > > /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong format > > > > > > This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with > > > "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the > > > "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the > > > first object as output format. > > > > > > As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel > > > objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the > > > VDSO objects. > > > > I cross-compile ppc64 kernels and have not seen this problem. I do need > > to > > pass in -m64 as part of $(CC) if it's not the toolchain default, which is > > not > > nice, but the proper fix for that is to add -m64 in the makefiles -- and > > if I > > don't it fails way before VDSO. > > > > Why is GCC building ppc64 object files but telling the linker --oformat > > elf32- > > powerpcle? Are different options somehow being passed to GCC in one case > > versus the other? > > In fact, for all the other parts of the kernel, gcc is called with > "-mlittle-endian -m64", ld with "-EL -m elf64lppc", and thus generates > the good objects and calls ld with the good options ("elf64lppc"). I > think gcc is never used to link, only to compile. > This, I think, comes from: > > arch/powerpc/Makefile: > > ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN),y) > override CC += -mlittle-endian > override LD += -EL > ... > ifeq ($(HAS_BIARCH),y) > override CC += -m$(CONFIG_WORD_SIZE) > override LD += -m elf$(CONFIG_WORD_SIZE)$(LDEMULATION) OK, that works if I completely remove the CC environment setting rather than just remove the -m64 from it. It looks like that's been there longer than I've been building 64-bit kernels, so I wonder what originally prompted me to add the environment setting. Yes, the kernel itself is linked with ld rather than gcc, but that's unusual. There's nothing wrong with using gcc to link. > So at this point, I can: > > 1- either fix my compiler, > 2- or fix the vdso64 linker command. Do #1, as that's where the bug is, and if you work around it you'll have the same problem building other projects if they happen to specify the endianness explicitly. -Scott ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-06 23:24 ` Scott Wood @ 2015-11-07 11:35 ` Laurent Vivier 2015-11-10 0:29 ` Michael Ellerman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Laurent Vivier @ 2015-11-07 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Scott Wood; +Cc: benh, paulus, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel Le 07/11/2015 00:24, Scott Wood a écrit : > On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 23:22 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> Le 06/11/2015 22:09, Scott Wood a écrit : >>> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>>> When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally >>>> fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- >>>> compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel >>>> on a ppc64 host. >>>> >>>> VDSO64L fails: >>>> >>>> VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg >>>> /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: >>>> file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 >>>> /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong format >>>> >>>> This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with >>>> "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the >>>> "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the >>>> first object as output format. >>>> >>>> As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel >>>> objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the >>>> VDSO objects. >>> >>> I cross-compile ppc64 kernels and have not seen this problem. I do need >>> to >>> pass in -m64 as part of $(CC) if it's not the toolchain default, which is >>> not >>> nice, but the proper fix for that is to add -m64 in the makefiles -- and >>> if I >>> don't it fails way before VDSO. >>> >>> Why is GCC building ppc64 object files but telling the linker --oformat >>> elf32- >>> powerpcle? Are different options somehow being passed to GCC in one case >>> versus the other? >> >> In fact, for all the other parts of the kernel, gcc is called with >> "-mlittle-endian -m64", ld with "-EL -m elf64lppc", and thus generates >> the good objects and calls ld with the good options ("elf64lppc"). I >> think gcc is never used to link, only to compile. >> This, I think, comes from: >> >> arch/powerpc/Makefile: >> >> ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN),y) >> override CC += -mlittle-endian >> override LD += -EL >> ... >> ifeq ($(HAS_BIARCH),y) >> override CC += -m$(CONFIG_WORD_SIZE) >> override LD += -m elf$(CONFIG_WORD_SIZE)$(LDEMULATION) > > OK, that works if I completely remove the CC environment setting rather than > just remove the -m64 from it. It looks like that's been there longer than > I've been building 64-bit kernels, so I wonder what originally prompted me to > add the environment setting. > > Yes, the kernel itself is linked with ld rather than gcc, but that's unusual. > There's nothing wrong with using gcc to link. > >> So at this point, I can: >> >> 1- either fix my compiler, >> 2- or fix the vdso64 linker command. > > Do #1, as that's where the bug is, and if you work around it you'll have the > same problem building other projects if they happen to specify the endianness > explicitly. Thank you Scott. With the help of the comment from Segher, I can choose #1 now :) Laurent ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-07 11:35 ` Laurent Vivier @ 2015-11-10 0:29 ` Michael Ellerman 2015-11-10 7:54 ` Laurent Vivier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2015-11-10 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Vivier, Scott Wood; +Cc: paulus, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 12:35 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 07/11/2015 00:24, Scott Wood a écrit : > > On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 23:22 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > Le 06/11/2015 22:09, Scott Wood a écrit : > > > > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > > > When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally > > > > > fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- > > > > > compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel > > > > > on a ppc64 host. > > > > > > > > > > VDSO64L fails: > > > > > > > > > > VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg > > > > > /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: > > > > > file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 > > > > > /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong format > > > > > > > > > > This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with > > > > > "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the > > > > > "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the > > > > > first object as output format. > > > > > > > > > > As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel > > > > > objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the > > > > > VDSO objects. > > > > > So at this point, I can: > > > > > > 1- either fix my compiler, > > > 2- or fix the vdso64 linker command. > > > Thank you Scott. With the help of the comment from Segher, I can choose > #1 now :) What distro/toolchain did you hit this on? I actually wrote this same patch a while back, but from memory it broke in some configurations. So I never merged it. I'll see if I can find my notes and work out exactly why it didn't work, maybe we should merge it anyway, even though the real bug is a toolchain bug. cheers ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-10 0:29 ` Michael Ellerman @ 2015-11-10 7:54 ` Laurent Vivier 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Laurent Vivier @ 2015-11-10 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Ellerman, Scott Wood; +Cc: paulus, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel Le 10/11/2015 01:29, Michael Ellerman a écrit : > On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 12:35 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> Le 07/11/2015 00:24, Scott Wood a écrit : >>> On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 23:22 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>>> Le 06/11/2015 22:09, Scott Wood a écrit : >>>>> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>>>>> When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally >>>>>> fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- >>>>>> compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel >>>>>> on a ppc64 host. >>>>>> >>>>>> VDSO64L fails: >>>>>> >>>>>> VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg >>>>>> /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: >>>>>> file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 >>>>>> /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong format >>>>>> >>>>>> This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with >>>>>> "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the >>>>>> "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the >>>>>> first object as output format. >>>>>> >>>>>> As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel >>>>>> objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the >>>>>> VDSO objects. >>> >>>> So at this point, I can: >>>> >>>> 1- either fix my compiler, >>>> 2- or fix the vdso64 linker command. >>> >> Thank you Scott. With the help of the comment from Segher, I can choose >> #1 now :) > > What distro/toolchain did you hit this on? fedora 23. > I actually wrote this same patch a while back, but from memory it broke in some > configurations. So I never merged it. I'll see if I can find my notes and work > out exactly why it didn't work, maybe we should merge it anyway, even though > the real bug is a toolchain bug. On fedora, there is also a bug in binutils configuration where ld is not able to manage ppc64le binaries on ppc64 host, but I've already sent a fix for that and it is now in rawhide (will be in fedora 24). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275709 Laurent ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-06 21:09 ` Scott Wood 2015-11-06 22:22 ` Laurent Vivier @ 2015-11-06 22:55 ` Segher Boessenkool 2015-11-06 23:32 ` Segher Boessenkool 2015-11-06 23:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2015-11-06 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Scott Wood; +Cc: Laurent Vivier, paulus, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:09:40PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > Why is GCC building ppc64 object files but telling the linker --oformat elf32- > powerpcle? Are different options somehow being passed to GCC in one case > versus the other? This was changed for GCC 6 in <http://gcc.gnu.org/r227397>, could one of you check if that fixes this problem? If so we'll need to backport it. Segher ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-06 22:55 ` Segher Boessenkool @ 2015-11-06 23:32 ` Segher Boessenkool 2015-11-07 11:32 ` Laurent Vivier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2015-11-06 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Scott Wood; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, paulus, Laurent Vivier, linux-kernel On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:55:49PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:09:40PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > Why is GCC building ppc64 object files but telling the linker --oformat elf32- > > powerpcle? Are different options somehow being passed to GCC in one case > > versus the other? > > This was changed for GCC 6 in <http://gcc.gnu.org/r227397>, could one of > you check if that fixes this problem? If so we'll need to backport it. Actually it already has been backported, r228089. Segher ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-06 23:32 ` Segher Boessenkool @ 2015-11-07 11:32 ` Laurent Vivier 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Laurent Vivier @ 2015-11-07 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Segher Boessenkool, Scott Wood; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, paulus, linux-kernel Le 07/11/2015 00:32, Segher Boessenkool a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:55:49PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:09:40PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: >>> Why is GCC building ppc64 object files but telling the linker --oformat elf32- >>> powerpcle? Are different options somehow being passed to GCC in one case >>> versus the other? >> >> This was changed for GCC 6 in <http://gcc.gnu.org/r227397>, could one of >> you check if that fixes this problem? If so we'll need to backport it. > > Actually it already has been backported, r228089. Thank you, I'm going to see if it can be included in the distro I use. Laurent ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-06 21:09 ` Scott Wood 2015-11-06 22:22 ` Laurent Vivier 2015-11-06 22:55 ` Segher Boessenkool @ 2015-11-06 23:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2015-11-07 11:34 ` Laurent Vivier 2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2015-11-06 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Scott Wood, Laurent Vivier; +Cc: paulus, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 15:09 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally > > fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- > > compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel > > on a ppc64 host. > > > > VDSO64L fails: > > > > VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg > > /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: > > file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 > > /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong > > format > > > > This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with > > "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the > > "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the > > first object as output format. > > > > As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel > > objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the > > VDSO objects. This is LE ? I think that's a bug in binutils or gcc ... I remember we fought that a while ago for the openpower builds. It might have been fixed in upstream toolchain. Cheers, Ben. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel 2015-11-06 23:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2015-11-07 11:34 ` Laurent Vivier 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Laurent Vivier @ 2015-11-07 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Scott Wood; +Cc: paulus, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel Le 07/11/2015 00:12, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit : > On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 15:09 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally >>> fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- >>> compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel >>> on a ppc64 host. >>> >>> VDSO64L fails: >>> >>> VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg >>> /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: >>> file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 >>> /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong >>> format >>> >>> This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with >>> "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the >>> "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the >>> first object as output format. >>> >>> As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel >>> objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the >>> VDSO objects. > > This is LE ? I think that's a bug in binutils or gcc ... I remember we > fought that a while ago for the openpower builds. It might have been > fixed in upstream toolchain. Yes, Segher has given me the commit id. It is just what I need. Laurent ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-10 7:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-11-05 11:47 [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel Laurent Vivier 2015-11-06 21:09 ` Scott Wood 2015-11-06 22:22 ` Laurent Vivier 2015-11-06 23:24 ` Scott Wood 2015-11-07 11:35 ` Laurent Vivier 2015-11-10 0:29 ` Michael Ellerman 2015-11-10 7:54 ` Laurent Vivier 2015-11-06 22:55 ` Segher Boessenkool 2015-11-06 23:32 ` Segher Boessenkool 2015-11-07 11:32 ` Laurent Vivier 2015-11-06 23:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2015-11-07 11:34 ` Laurent Vivier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).