linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] locking/mutex: Add waiter parameter to mutex_optimistic_spin()
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:03:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C2673F.6070202@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160212220249.GA16417@linux-uzut.site>

On 02/12/2016 05:02 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> This patch adds a new waiter parameter to the mutex_optimistic_spin()
>> function to prepare it to be used by a waiter-spinner that doesn't
>> need to go into the OSQ as there can only be one waiter-spinner which
>> is the head of the waiting queue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c |   55 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
>> index 0551c21..3c41448 100644
>> --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
>> +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
>> @@ -273,11 +273,15 @@ static inline int 
>> mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
>>
>> /*
>>  * Atomically try to take the lock when it is available
>> + *
>> + * For waiter-spinner, the count needs to be set to -1 first which 
>> will be
>> + * cleared to 0 later on if the list becomes empty. For regular 
>> spinner,
>> + * the count will be set to 0.
>>  */
>> -static inline bool mutex_try_to_acquire(struct mutex *lock)
>> +static inline bool mutex_try_to_acquire(struct mutex *lock, int waiter)
>> {
>>     return !mutex_is_locked(lock) &&
>> -        (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1);
>> +        (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->count, 1, waiter ? -1 : 0) == 
>> 1);
>> }
>
> This can be a really hot path, could we get rid of the waiter check 
> and just
> introduce mutex_tro_to_acquire_waiter() or such and set the counter to 
> -1 there?
>
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr

It is hot in the sense that the lock cacheline is highly contested. On 
x86, the ?: statement will most likely be translated to a cmov 
instruction before doing the cmpxchg. The cmov instruction won't affect 
the amount of cacheline contention on that lock cacheline. So I don't 
see there is any problem here.

Cheers,
Longman

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-16  0:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-12 17:32 [PATCH v2 0/4] locking/mutex: Enable optimistic spinning of lock waiter Waiman Long
2016-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] locking/mutex: Add waiter parameter to mutex_optimistic_spin() Waiman Long
2016-02-12 20:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-12 22:14     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-13 12:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-13 18:14         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-16  2:15       ` Jason Low
2016-02-16  2:22         ` Jason Low
2016-02-16  8:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17  1:40             ` Waiman Long
2016-02-15 22:06     ` Waiman Long
2016-02-12 20:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-15 23:55     ` Waiman Long
2016-02-16  3:00       ` Jason Low
2016-02-16  3:30         ` Waiman Long
2016-02-12 22:02   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-12 22:09     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-16  0:03     ` Waiman Long [this message]
2016-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] locking/mutex: Enable optimistic spinning of woken task in wait queue Waiman Long
2016-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] locking/mutex: Avoid missed wakeup of mutex waiter Waiman Long
2016-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/fair: Abort wakeup when task is no longer in a sleeping state Waiman Long
2016-02-12 20:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-12 21:22     ` Waiman Long
2016-02-13 12:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-16  8:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] locking/mutex: Enable optimistic spinning of lock waiter Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17  1:39   ` Waiman Long
2016-03-22  3:19   ` Waiman Long
2016-03-22  9:59     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C2673F.6070202@hpe.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).