linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add device HID for future AMD I2C controller
  2016-03-10 11:34 [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add device HID for future AMD I2C controller Xiangliang Yu
@ 2016-03-10  8:32 ` Jarkko Nikula
  2016-03-10 22:48   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2016-03-12 16:03   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Nikula @ 2016-03-10  8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xiangliang Yu, rjw, lenb, andriy.shevchenko, mika.westerberg, wsa
  Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-i2c, SPG_Linux_Kernel

On 03/10/2016 01:34 PM, Xiangliang Yu wrote:
> Add device HID AMDI0010 to match the AMD ACPI Vendor ID (AMDI) that
> was registered in http://www.uefi.org/acpi_id_list, and the I2C
> controller on future AMD paltform will use the HID instead of AMD0010.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu <Xiangliang.Yu@amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c                     | 1 +
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 +
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> index d507cf6..d0aad06 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_apd_device_ids[] = {
>   	/* Generic apd devices */
>   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE
>   	{ "AMD0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) },
> +	{ "AMDI0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) },
>   	{ "AMD0020", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) },
>   	{ "AMD0030", },
>   #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> index 438f1b4..d656657 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id dw_i2c_acpi_match[] = {
>   	{ "80860F41", 0 },
>   	{ "808622C1", 0 },
>   	{ "AMD0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK },
> +	{ "AMDI0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK },
>   	{ "AMDI0510", 0 },
>   	{ "APMC0D0F", 0 },
>   	{ }
> --
I guess these changes don't necessarily need to go together? Although I 
think chances to get a conflict is pretty low.

For i2c-designware:
Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add device HID for future AMD I2C controller
@ 2016-03-10 11:34 Xiangliang Yu
  2016-03-10  8:32 ` Jarkko Nikula
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xiangliang Yu @ 2016-03-10 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rjw, lenb, andriy.shevchenko, jarkko.nikula, mika.westerberg, wsa
  Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-i2c, SPG_Linux_Kernel, Xiangliang Yu

Add device HID AMDI0010 to match the AMD ACPI Vendor ID (AMDI) that
was registered in http://www.uefi.org/acpi_id_list, and the I2C
controller on future AMD paltform will use the HID instead of AMD0010.

Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu <Xiangliang.Yu@amd.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c                     | 1 +
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
index d507cf6..d0aad06 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_apd_device_ids[] = {
 	/* Generic apd devices */
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE
 	{ "AMD0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) },
+	{ "AMDI0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) },
 	{ "AMD0020", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) },
 	{ "AMD0030", },
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
index 438f1b4..d656657 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id dw_i2c_acpi_match[] = {
 	{ "80860F41", 0 },
 	{ "808622C1", 0 },
 	{ "AMD0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK },
+	{ "AMDI0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK },
 	{ "AMDI0510", 0 },
 	{ "APMC0D0F", 0 },
 	{ }
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add device HID for future AMD I2C controller
  2016-03-10  8:32 ` Jarkko Nikula
@ 2016-03-10 22:48   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2016-03-12 16:03   ` Wolfram Sang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2016-03-10 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jarkko Nikula
  Cc: Xiangliang Yu, lenb, andriy.shevchenko, mika.westerberg, wsa,
	linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-i2c, SPG_Linux_Kernel

On Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:32:04 AM Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 01:34 PM, Xiangliang Yu wrote:
> > Add device HID AMDI0010 to match the AMD ACPI Vendor ID (AMDI) that
> > was registered in http://www.uefi.org/acpi_id_list, and the I2C
> > controller on future AMD paltform will use the HID instead of AMD0010.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu <Xiangliang.Yu@amd.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c                     | 1 +
> >   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 +
> >   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> > index d507cf6..d0aad06 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_apd_device_ids[] = {
> >   	/* Generic apd devices */
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE
> >   	{ "AMD0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) },
> > +	{ "AMDI0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) },
> >   	{ "AMD0020", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) },
> >   	{ "AMD0030", },
> >   #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > index 438f1b4..d656657 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id dw_i2c_acpi_match[] = {
> >   	{ "80860F41", 0 },
> >   	{ "808622C1", 0 },
> >   	{ "AMD0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK },
> > +	{ "AMDI0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK },
> >   	{ "AMDI0510", 0 },
> >   	{ "APMC0D0F", 0 },
> >   	{ }
> > --
> I guess these changes don't necessarily need to go together? Although I 
> think chances to get a conflict is pretty low.
> 
> For i2c-designware:
> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>

OK, queued up for 4.6, thanks!

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add device HID for future AMD I2C controller
  2016-03-10  8:32 ` Jarkko Nikula
  2016-03-10 22:48   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2016-03-12 16:03   ` Wolfram Sang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2016-03-12 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jarkko Nikula
  Cc: Xiangliang Yu, rjw, lenb, andriy.shevchenko, mika.westerberg,
	linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-i2c, SPG_Linux_Kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1866 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:32:04AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 01:34 PM, Xiangliang Yu wrote:
> >Add device HID AMDI0010 to match the AMD ACPI Vendor ID (AMDI) that
> >was registered in http://www.uefi.org/acpi_id_list, and the I2C
> >controller on future AMD paltform will use the HID instead of AMD0010.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu <Xiangliang.Yu@amd.com>
> >---
> >  drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c                     | 1 +
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> >index d507cf6..d0aad06 100644
> >--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> >+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> >@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_apd_device_ids[] = {
> >  	/* Generic apd devices */
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE
> >  	{ "AMD0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) },
> >+	{ "AMDI0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) },
> >  	{ "AMD0020", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) },
> >  	{ "AMD0030", },
> >  #endif
> >diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> >index 438f1b4..d656657 100644
> >--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> >+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> >@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id dw_i2c_acpi_match[] = {
> >  	{ "80860F41", 0 },
> >  	{ "808622C1", 0 },
> >  	{ "AMD0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK },
> >+	{ "AMDI0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK },
> >  	{ "AMDI0510", 0 },
> >  	{ "APMC0D0F", 0 },
> >  	{ }
> >--
> I guess these changes don't necessarily need to go together? Although I
> think chances to get a conflict is pretty low.

I would have preferred seperate patches, too.

> For i2c-designware:
> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>

For the record:

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-12 16:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-10 11:34 [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add device HID for future AMD I2C controller Xiangliang Yu
2016-03-10  8:32 ` Jarkko Nikula
2016-03-10 22:48   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-12 16:03   ` Wolfram Sang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).