linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"Pan, Miaoqing" <miaoqing@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	ath9k-devel <ath9k-devel@qualcomm.com>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Miaoqing Pan <miaoqing@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: ath9k gpio request
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 23:10:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57546409.70506@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d1nxt3y9.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>

On Saturday 04 June 2016 08:07 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (Fixing top posting)
>
> "Pan, Miaoqing" <miaoqing@qti.qualcomm.com> writes:
>
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/reg.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/reg.h
>>>> @@ -1122,8 +1122,8 @@ enum {
>>>>    #define AR9300_NUM_GPIO                          16
>>>>    #define AR9330_NUM_GPIO                                 16
>>>>    #define AR9340_NUM_GPIO                                 23
>>>> -#define AR9462_NUM_GPIO                                 10
>>>> -#define AR9485_NUM_GPIO                                 12
>>>> +#define AR9462_NUM_GPIO                                 14
>>>> +#define AR9485_NUM_GPIO                                 11
>>>>    #define AR9531_NUM_GPIO                                 18
>>>>    #define AR9550_NUM_GPIO                                 24
>>>>    #define AR9561_NUM_GPIO                                 23
>>>> @@ -1139,8 +1139,8 @@ enum {
>>>>    #define AR9300_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000F4FF
>>>>    #define AR9330_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000F4FF
>>>>    #define AR9340_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F
>>>> -#define AR9462_GPIO_MASK                        0x000003FF
>>>> -#define AR9485_GPIO_MASK                        0x00000FFF
>>>> +#define AR9462_GPIO_MASK                        0x00003FFF
>>>> +#define AR9485_GPIO_MASK                        0x000007FF
>>>>    #define AR9531_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F
>>>>    #define AR9550_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F
>>>>    #define AR9561_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F
>>>
>>> solves the problem.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
>>
>> Done, https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9151847/
>
> But the patch 9151847 is different from what Sudip tested above? Why?
>
> And if you modify something _after_ the reporter has tested the patch
> clearly document what you changed and why. I do not want find hidden
> changes like this, even more so when the patch is going to a 4.7-rc
> release.
>
> Sudip, could you also test patch 9151847, please? You can download the
> patch from the patchwork link above.

This is also ok. Please add my
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

and maybe a Reported-by tag is also appropriate in this case.


Regards
Sudip

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-05 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-30  3:22 linux-next: Tree for May 30 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-30 14:04 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-05-31  7:31   ` ath9k gpio request Kalle Valo
2016-05-31  7:35     ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-06-01  6:54       ` Pan, Miaoqing
2016-06-01 11:12         ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-06-01 12:18           ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-06-02  8:02             ` Pan, Miaoqing
2016-06-02  9:01               ` Janusz Dziedzic
2016-06-02 11:39               ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-06-03  5:33                 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-03  5:49                   ` Pan, Miaoqing
2016-06-04 14:37                     ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-05 17:40                       ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2016-06-07 11:43                         ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-06  1:51                       ` Pan, Miaoqing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57546409.70506@gmail.com \
    --to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miaoqing@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=miaoqing@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).