linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
@ 2016-08-25  8:20 SF Markus Elfring
  2016-08-25  8:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions SF Markus Elfring
  2016-08-25  8:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Delete an unnecessary initialisation in led_proc_write() SF Markus Elfring
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2016-08-25  8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux, David S. Miller
  Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors, Julia Lawall, Paolo Bonzini

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:05:45 +0200

A few update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.

Markus Elfring (2):
  Use kmalloc_array()
  Delete an unnecessary initialisation in led_proc_write()

 arch/sparc/kernel/led.c          | 4 ++--
 arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c          | 4 +++-
 arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c | 6 ++++--
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions
  2016-08-25  8:20 [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Fine-tuning for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring
@ 2016-08-25  8:22 ` SF Markus Elfring
  2016-08-29  9:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
  2016-08-25  8:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Delete an unnecessary initialisation in led_proc_write() SF Markus Elfring
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2016-08-25  8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux, David S. Miller
  Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors, Julia Lawall, Paolo Bonzini

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:52:44 +0200

* Multiplications for the size determination of memory allocations
  indicated that array data structures should be processed.
  Thus reuse the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".

  This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

* Replace the specifications of data types by pointer dereferences
  to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
  the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/led.c          | 2 +-
 arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c          | 4 +++-
 arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c | 6 ++++--
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
index 3ae36f3..7444e4a 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static ssize_t led_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
 	if (count > LED_MAX_LENGTH)
 		count = LED_MAX_LENGTH;
 
-	buf = kmalloc(sizeof(char) * (count + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
+	buf = kmalloc_array(count + 1, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!buf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c
index a9973bb..b88e97b 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -166,7 +166,9 @@ static int __init check_nmi_watchdog(void)
 	if (!atomic_read(&nmi_active))
 		return 0;
 
-	prev_nmi_count = kmalloc(nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL);
+	prev_nmi_count = kmalloc_array(nr_cpu_ids,
+				       sizeof(*prev_nmi_count),
+				       GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!prev_nmi_count) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto error;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c
index fe8b8ee..25b7a14 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c
@@ -580,8 +580,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(utrap_install, utrap_entry_t, type,
 			unsigned long *p = current_thread_info()->utraps;
 
 			current_thread_info()->utraps =
-				kmalloc((UT_TRAP_INSTRUCTION_31+1)*sizeof(long),
-					GFP_KERNEL);
+				kmalloc_array(UT_TRAP_INSTRUCTION_31 + 1,
+					      sizeof(*current_thread_info()
+						     ->utraps),
+					      GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!current_thread_info()->utraps) {
 				current_thread_info()->utraps = p;
 				return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Delete an unnecessary initialisation in led_proc_write()
  2016-08-25  8:20 [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Fine-tuning for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring
  2016-08-25  8:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions SF Markus Elfring
@ 2016-08-25  8:24 ` SF Markus Elfring
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2016-08-25  8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux, David S. Miller
  Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors, Julia Lawall, Paolo Bonzini

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:55:22 +0200

The local variable "buf" will be set to an appropriate value a bit later.
Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/led.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
index 7444e4a..d6671af 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int led_proc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 static ssize_t led_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
 			      size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
 {
-	char *buf = NULL;
+	char *buf;
 
 	if (count > LED_MAX_LENGTH)
 		count = LED_MAX_LENGTH;
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions
  2016-08-25  8:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions SF Markus Elfring
@ 2016-08-29  9:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
  2016-08-29 10:36     ` SF Markus Elfring
  2016-08-29 11:57     ` walter harms
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-08-29  9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SF Markus Elfring, sparclinux, David S. Miller
  Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors, Julia Lawall



On 25/08/2016 10:22, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static ssize_t led_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>  	if (count > LED_MAX_LENGTH)
>  		count = LED_MAX_LENGTH;
>  
> -	buf = kmalloc(sizeof(char) * (count + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	buf = kmalloc_array(count + 1, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!buf)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  

Here it's probably best to just remove sizeof(char) completely, as it's
1 by definition.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions
  2016-08-29  9:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2016-08-29 10:36     ` SF Markus Elfring
  2016-08-29 11:57     ` walter harms
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2016-08-29 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: sparclinux, David S. Miller, LKML, kernel-janitors, Julia Lawall

>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static ssize_t led_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>>  	if (count > LED_MAX_LENGTH)
>>  		count = LED_MAX_LENGTH;
>>  
>> -	buf = kmalloc(sizeof(char) * (count + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	buf = kmalloc_array(count + 1, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
>>  	if (!buf)
>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>  
> 
> Here it's probably best to just remove sizeof(char) completely,
> as it's 1 by definition.

Would you like to be prepared anyhow that the shown buffer variable
could eventually store other data than ordinary single byte characters?

Regards,
Markus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions
  2016-08-29  9:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
  2016-08-29 10:36     ` SF Markus Elfring
@ 2016-08-29 11:57     ` walter harms
  2016-08-29 16:38       ` Paolo Bonzini
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: walter harms @ 2016-08-29 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: SF Markus Elfring, sparclinux, David S. Miller, LKML,
	kernel-janitors, Julia Lawall



Am 29.08.2016 11:47, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> 
> 
> On 25/08/2016 10:22, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
>> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static ssize_t led_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>>  	if (count > LED_MAX_LENGTH)
>>  		count = LED_MAX_LENGTH;
>>  
>> -	buf = kmalloc(sizeof(char) * (count + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	buf = kmalloc_array(count + 1, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
>>  	if (!buf)
>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>  
> 
> Here it's probably best to just remove sizeof(char) completely, as it's
> 1 by definition.
> 
> Paolo


I would not do so, if you ever change buf to something else it would break,
having a sizeof(*buf) here is harmless and a known pattern.

re,
 wh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions
  2016-08-29 11:57     ` walter harms
@ 2016-08-29 16:38       ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-08-29 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wharms
  Cc: SF Markus Elfring, sparclinux, David S. Miller, LKML,
	kernel-janitors, Julia Lawall



On 29/08/2016 13:57, walter harms wrote:
> > > -	buf = kmalloc(sizeof(char) * (count + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +	buf = kmalloc_array(count + 1, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >  	if (!buf)
> > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > >  
> > 
> > Here it's probably best to just remove sizeof(char) completely, as it's
> > 1 by definition.
> 
> I would not do so, if you ever change buf to something else it would break,
> having a sizeof(*buf) here is harmless and a known pattern.

Fair enough, it's not code I maintain.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-29 16:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-25  8:20 [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Fine-tuning for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25  8:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-29  9:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-29 10:36     ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-29 11:57     ` walter harms
2016-08-29 16:38       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-25  8:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Delete an unnecessary initialisation in led_proc_write() SF Markus Elfring

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).