linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
	"Christopher Covington" <cov@codeaurora.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>, <harba@codeaurora.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>, Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>,
	<astone@redhat.com>, Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
	Charles Garcia Tobin <charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com>,
	<rjwysocki@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/3] irqchip: qcom: Add IRQ combiner driver
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:41:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <587CDB96.9000906@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8587b5ab-59b1-feb7-09d9-7ade6d433a4c@arm.com>

On 2017/1/16 22:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 16/01/17 14:07, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> On 2017-01-03 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Agustin Vega-Frias
>>> <agustinv@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is there any more feedback on this beyond Lorenzo's suggestion to drop
>>>> the conditional check on the first patch?
>>>> How can we move forward on this series?
>>> Essentially, I need to convince myself that patches [1-2/3] are fine
>>> which hasn't happened yet.
>> Pinging again. Do you have any questions that might help with your
>> review? I have some minor changes I have to make to the driver itself
>> (patch 3) and I'd like to submit any changes you might want along with
>> those.
> I'd like to add that these two initial patches are now a prerequisite
> for Hanjun's series, so it'd be good to have an idea of where we're
> going on that front.

Is it helpful to test patch [1-2/3] on x86 machines (with different firmware) and
an IA64 machine (surely a different version of firmware :) ) with Lorenzo's suggestion
of removing  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI for is_gsi()? If yes, I can do that as
I have such machines.

Thanks
Hanjun

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-16 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-14 22:10 [PATCH V9 0/3] irqchip: qcom: Add IRQ combiner driver Agustin Vega-Frias
2016-12-14 22:10 ` [PATCH V9 1/3] ACPI: Generic GSI: Do not attempt to map non-GSI IRQs during bus scan Agustin Vega-Frias
2016-12-16 16:24   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-12-16 16:30     ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-01-17 12:15   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-17 15:04     ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2016-12-14 22:10 ` [PATCH V9 2/3] ACPI: Add support for ResourceSource/IRQ domain mapping Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-01-17 12:47   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-17 15:07     ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-01-18  1:40       ` Hanjun Guo
2016-12-14 22:10 ` [PATCH V9 3/3] irqchip: qcom: Add IRQ combiner driver Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-01-05 16:48   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-06 13:17     ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-01-09 15:25       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-03 15:19 ` [PATCH V9 0/3] " Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-01-03 21:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-01-04 12:37     ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-01-16 14:07     ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-01-16 14:14       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-16 14:41         ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2017-01-16 14:53           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-01-17 12:10             ` Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=587CDB96.9000906@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=agustinv@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ahs3@redhat.com \
    --cc=astone@redhat.com \
    --cc=charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com \
    --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
    --cc=harba@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mlangsdo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rjwysocki@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).