linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] crypto: nx-sha256/512: respect sg limit bounds when building sg lists
@ 2015-08-08  6:47 Jan Stancek
  2015-08-11 14:06 ` Herbert Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2015-08-08  6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-crypto
  Cc: linux-kernel, leosilva, mhcerri, fin, herbert, davem, jstancek

Commit 000851119e80 changed sha256/512 update functions to
pass more data to nx_build_sg_list(), which ends with
sg list overflows and usually with update functions failing
for data larger than max_sg_len * NX_PAGE_SIZE.

This happens because:
- both "total" and "to_process" are updated, which leads to
  "to_process" getting overflowed for some data lengths
  For example:
    In first iteration "total" is 50, and let's assume "to_process"
    is 30 due to sg limits. At the end of first iteration "total" is
    set to 20. At start of 2nd iteration "to_process" overflows on:
      to_process = total - to_process;
- "in_sg" is not reset to nx_ctx->in_sg after each iteration
- nx_build_sg_list() is hitting overflow because the amount of data
  passed to it would require more than sgmax elements
- as consequence of previous item, data stored in overflowed sg list
  may no longer be aligned to SHA*_BLOCK_SIZE

This patch changes sha256/512 update functions so that "to_process"
respects sg limits and never tries to pass more data to
nx_build_sg_list() to avoid overflows. "to_process" is calculated
as minimum of "total" and sg limits at start of every iteration.

Fixes: 000851119e80 ("crypto: nx - Fix SHA concurrence issue and sg
                      limit bounds")

Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Cc: Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa <leosilva@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Henrique Cerri <mhcerri@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Fionnuala Gunter <fin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha256.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha512.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha256.c b/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha256.c
index 08f8d5cd6334..becb738c897b 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha256.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha256.c
@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 	struct sha256_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
 	struct nx_crypto_ctx *nx_ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(&desc->tfm->base);
 	struct nx_csbcpb *csbcpb = (struct nx_csbcpb *)nx_ctx->csbcpb;
-	struct nx_sg *in_sg;
 	struct nx_sg *out_sg;
 	u64 to_process = 0, leftover, total;
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
@@ -97,7 +96,6 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 	NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_INTERMEDIATE;
 	NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_CONTINUATION;
 
-	in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
 	max_sg_len = min_t(u64, nx_ctx->ap->sglen,
 			nx_driver.of.max_sg_len/sizeof(struct nx_sg));
 	max_sg_len = min_t(u64, max_sg_len,
@@ -114,17 +112,12 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 	}
 
 	do {
-		/*
-		 * to_process: the SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE data chunk to process in
-		 * this update. This value is also restricted by the sg list
-		 * limits.
-		 */
-		to_process = total - to_process;
-		to_process = to_process & ~(SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
+		int used_sgs = 0;
+		struct nx_sg *in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
 
 		if (buf_len) {
 			data_len = buf_len;
-			in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(nx_ctx->in_sg,
+			in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg,
 						 (u8 *) sctx->buf,
 						 &data_len,
 						 max_sg_len);
@@ -133,15 +126,27 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 				rc = -EINVAL;
 				goto out;
 			}
+			used_sgs = in_sg - nx_ctx->in_sg;
 		}
 
+		/* to_process: SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE aligned chunk to be
+		 * processed in this iteration. This value is restricted
+		 * by sg list limits and number of sgs we already used
+		 * for leftover data. (see above)
+		 * In ideal case, we could allow NX_PAGE_SIZE * max_sg_len,
+		 * but because data may not be aligned, we need to account
+		 * for that too. */
+		to_process = min_t(u64, total,
+			(max_sg_len - 1 - used_sgs) * NX_PAGE_SIZE);
+		to_process = to_process & ~(SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
+
 		data_len = to_process - buf_len;
 		in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg, (u8 *) data,
 					 &data_len, max_sg_len);
 
 		nx_ctx->op.inlen = (nx_ctx->in_sg - in_sg) * sizeof(struct nx_sg);
 
-		to_process = (data_len + buf_len);
+		to_process = data_len + buf_len;
 		leftover = total - to_process;
 
 		/*
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha512.c b/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha512.c
index aff0fe58eac0..b6e183d58d73 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha512.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha512.c
@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 	struct sha512_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
 	struct nx_crypto_ctx *nx_ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(&desc->tfm->base);
 	struct nx_csbcpb *csbcpb = (struct nx_csbcpb *)nx_ctx->csbcpb;
-	struct nx_sg *in_sg;
 	struct nx_sg *out_sg;
 	u64 to_process, leftover = 0, total;
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
@@ -97,7 +96,6 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 	NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_INTERMEDIATE;
 	NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_CONTINUATION;
 
-	in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
 	max_sg_len = min_t(u64, nx_ctx->ap->sglen,
 			nx_driver.of.max_sg_len/sizeof(struct nx_sg));
 	max_sg_len = min_t(u64, max_sg_len,
@@ -114,18 +112,12 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 	}
 
 	do {
-		/*
-		 * to_process: the SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE data chunk to process in
-		 * this update. This value is also restricted by the sg list
-		 * limits.
-		 */
-		to_process = total - leftover;
-		to_process = to_process & ~(SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
-		leftover = total - to_process;
+		int used_sgs = 0;
+		struct nx_sg *in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
 
 		if (buf_len) {
 			data_len = buf_len;
-			in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(nx_ctx->in_sg,
+			in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg,
 						 (u8 *) sctx->buf,
 						 &data_len, max_sg_len);
 
@@ -133,8 +125,20 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 				rc = -EINVAL;
 				goto out;
 			}
+			used_sgs = in_sg - nx_ctx->in_sg;
 		}
 
+		/* to_process: SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE aligned chunk to be
+		 * processed in this iteration. This value is restricted
+		 * by sg list limits and number of sgs we already used
+		 * for leftover data. (see above)
+		 * In ideal case, we could allow NX_PAGE_SIZE * max_sg_len,
+		 * but because data may not be aligned, we need to account
+		 * for that too. */
+		to_process = min_t(u64, total,
+			(max_sg_len - 1 - used_sgs) * NX_PAGE_SIZE);
+		to_process = to_process & ~(SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
+
 		data_len = to_process - buf_len;
 		in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg, (u8 *) data,
 					 &data_len, max_sg_len);
@@ -146,7 +150,7 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		to_process = (data_len + buf_len);
+		to_process = data_len + buf_len;
 		leftover = total - to_process;
 
 		/*
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] crypto: nx-sha256/512: respect sg limit bounds when building sg lists
  2015-08-08  6:47 [PATCH] crypto: nx-sha256/512: respect sg limit bounds when building sg lists Jan Stancek
@ 2015-08-11 14:06 ` Herbert Xu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2015-08-11 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Stancek; +Cc: linux-crypto, linux-kernel, leosilva, mhcerri, fin, davem

On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 08:47:28AM +0200, Jan Stancek wrote:
> Commit 000851119e80 changed sha256/512 update functions to
> pass more data to nx_build_sg_list(), which ends with
> sg list overflows and usually with update functions failing
> for data larger than max_sg_len * NX_PAGE_SIZE.
> 
> This happens because:
> - both "total" and "to_process" are updated, which leads to
>   "to_process" getting overflowed for some data lengths
>   For example:
>     In first iteration "total" is 50, and let's assume "to_process"
>     is 30 due to sg limits. At the end of first iteration "total" is
>     set to 20. At start of 2nd iteration "to_process" overflows on:
>       to_process = total - to_process;
> - "in_sg" is not reset to nx_ctx->in_sg after each iteration
> - nx_build_sg_list() is hitting overflow because the amount of data
>   passed to it would require more than sgmax elements
> - as consequence of previous item, data stored in overflowed sg list
>   may no longer be aligned to SHA*_BLOCK_SIZE
> 
> This patch changes sha256/512 update functions so that "to_process"
> respects sg limits and never tries to pass more data to
> nx_build_sg_list() to avoid overflows. "to_process" is calculated
> as minimum of "total" and sg limits at start of every iteration.
> 
> Fixes: 000851119e80 ("crypto: nx - Fix SHA concurrence issue and sg
>                       limit bounds")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa <leosilva@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Marcelo Henrique Cerri <mhcerri@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Fionnuala Gunter <fin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>

Patch applied with stable cc.  Thanks a lot!
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-11 14:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-08  6:47 [PATCH] crypto: nx-sha256/512: respect sg limit bounds when building sg lists Jan Stancek
2015-08-11 14:06 ` Herbert Xu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).