linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
To: nicolas saenz julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	kw@linux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI: brcmstb: Add ACPI config space quirk
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 11:23:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c39cf29-a08f-48d1-b873-ce0fda763d66@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44ad79081412af289c68e74cdecb6a2baa2e873c.camel@kernel.org>

Hi,

On 8/30/21 3:36 AM, nicolas saenz julienne wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
> sorry for the late reply, I've been on vacation.
> 
> On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 02:15 -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf2(struct pci_bus *bus,
>> +					unsigned int devfn, int where)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
>> +	void __iomem *base = cfg->win;
>> +	int idx;
>> +	u32 up;
>> +
>> +	/* Accesses to the RC go right to the RC registers if slot==0 */
>> +	if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
>> +		return PCI_SLOT(devfn) ? NULL : base + where;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Assure the link is up before sending requests downstream. This is done
>> +	 * to avoid sending transactions to EPs that don't exist. Link flap
>> +	 * conditions/etc make this race more probable. The resulting unrecoverable
>> +	 * SERRORs will result in the machine crashing.
>> +	 */
>> +	up = readl(base + PCIE_MISC_PCIE_STATUS);
>> +	if (!(up & PCIE_MISC_PCIE_STATUS_PCIE_DL_ACTIVE_MASK))
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	if (!(up & PCIE_MISC_PCIE_STATUS_PCIE_PHYLINKUP_MASK))
>> +		return NULL;
> 
> Couldn't this be integrated in the original brcm_pcie_map_conf()? IIUC there is
> nothing ACPI specific about it. It'd also make for less code duplication.

That is where I started with this, but it wasn't the linkup check/etc 
which caused me to hoist it but the fact that if ACPI quirks are enabled 
they end up statically built into the kernel. While if this host bridge 
is enabled, it can end up being a module, and the resulting mess I 
created trying to satisfy the CONFIG variations. I'm not much of a fan 
of copy/paste programming, but that IMHO ended up being the cleanest here.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-30 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-26  7:15 [PATCH v3 0/4] CM4 ACPI PCIe quirk Jeremy Linton
2021-08-26  7:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: brcmstb: Break register definitions into separate header Jeremy Linton
2021-08-30  8:37   ` nicolas saenz julienne
2021-08-26  7:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI: brcmstb: Add ACPI config space quirk Jeremy Linton
2021-08-30  8:36   ` nicolas saenz julienne
2021-08-30 16:23     ` Jeremy Linton [this message]
2021-08-30 16:27       ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-30 17:17         ` nicolas saenz julienne
2021-10-05 15:32   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-05 15:57     ` Jeremy Linton
2021-10-05 19:43       ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-05 22:25         ` Jeremy Linton
2021-10-06  2:07           ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-22 17:04             ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-22 17:17               ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-22 17:29                 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-22 17:57                   ` Pali Rohár
2021-08-26  7:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Add Broadcom bcm2711 MCFG quirk Jeremy Linton
2021-08-30  8:37   ` nicolas saenz julienne
2021-09-13 16:12   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-10-05 15:10   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-05 15:43     ` Jeremy Linton
2021-10-05 22:31       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-05 23:32         ` Jeremy Linton
2021-10-05 20:02   ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-05 22:44     ` Jeremy Linton
2021-08-26  7:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] MAINTAINERS: Widen brcmstb PCIe file scope Jeremy Linton
2021-08-30  8:38   ` nicolas saenz julienne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c39cf29-a08f-48d1-b873-ce0fda763d66@arm.com \
    --to=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).