From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"senozhatsky@chromium.org" <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
"linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: protect kernel from panic due to non-canonical pointer dereference
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:31:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d987403-a7bf-8996-d639-c99edeaabcdf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y02sENwhtpsx5yhP@smile.fi.intel.com>
On 10/17/2022 12:25 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:16:11PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
>> While debugging a separate issue, it was found that an invalid string
>> pointer could very well contain a non-canical address, such as
>> 0x7665645f63616465. In that case, this line of defense isn't enough
>> to protect the kernel from crashing due to general protection fault
>>
>> if ((unsigned long)ptr < PAGE_SIZE || IS_ERR_VALUE(ptr))
>> return "(efault)";
>>
>> So instead, use kern_addr_valid() to validate the string pointer.
>
> How did you check that value of the (invalid string) pointer?
>
In the bug scenario, the invalid string pointer was an out-of-bound
string pointer. While the OOB referencing is fixed, the lingering issue
is that the kernel ought to be able to protect itself, as the pointer
contains a non-canonical address. That said, I realized that not all
architecture implement meaningful kern_addr_valid(), so this line
if ((unsigned long)ptr < PAGE_SIZE || IS_ERR_VALUE(ptr))
is still need. I'll send v2.
thanks,
-jane
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-17 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 19:16 [PATCH] vsprintf: protect kernel from panic due to non-canonical pointer dereference Jane Chu
2022-10-17 19:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 19:31 ` Jane Chu [this message]
2022-10-18 12:45 ` Petr Mladek
2022-10-18 18:56 ` Jane Chu
2022-10-18 19:28 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-10-18 19:58 ` Jane Chu
2022-10-18 20:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-18 20:30 ` Jane Chu
2022-10-18 20:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-19 10:43 ` Haakon Bugge
2022-10-19 11:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-19 18:36 ` Jane Chu
2022-10-19 19:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-19 20:16 ` Jane Chu
2022-10-20 7:44 ` Petr Mladek
2022-10-20 9:18 ` Petr Mladek
2022-10-20 13:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d987403-a7bf-8996-d639-c99edeaabcdf@oracle.com \
--to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).