linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: introduce KVM_X86_QUIRK_TSC_HOST_ACCESS
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:15:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e77e912-893b-0c8f-a9a6-b43eaee24ed3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <638a2919cf7c11c55108776beecafdd8e2da2995.camel@redhat.com>

On 30/11/20 15:11, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 14:54 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 30/11/20 14:35, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>> This quirk reflects the fact that we currently treat MSR_IA32_TSC
>>> and MSR_TSC_ADJUST access by the host (e.g qemu) in a way that is different
>>> compared to an access from the guest.
>>>
>>> For host's MSR_IA32_TSC read we currently always return L1 TSC value, and for
>>> host's write we do the tsc synchronization.
>>>
>>> For host's MSR_TSC_ADJUST write, we don't make the tsc 'jump' as we should
>>> for this msr.
>>>
>>> When the hypervisor uses the new TSC GET/SET state ioctls, all of this is no
>>> longer needed, thus leave this enabled only with a quirk
>>> which the hypervisor can disable.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
>>
>> This needs to be covered by a variant of the existing selftests testcase
>> (running the same guest code, but different host code of course).
> Do you think that the test should go to the kernel's kvm unit tests,
> or to kvm-unit-tests project?

The latter already has x86_64/tsc_msrs_test.c (which I created in 
preparation for this exact change :)).

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30 13:35 [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Precise TSC migration Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: implement KVM_SET_TSC_PRECISE/KVM_GET_TSC_PRECISE Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 14:33   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 15:58     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 17:01       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-01 19:43   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 11:11     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 13:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: introduce KVM_X86_QUIRK_TSC_HOST_ACCESS Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 13:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 14:11     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 14:15       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-11-30 15:33         ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Precise TSC migration (summary) Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 16:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Precise TSC migration Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-30 16:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 19:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-12-01 12:30   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-01 19:48     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-12-03 11:39       ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-03 20:18         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-12-07 13:00           ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-01 13:48   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01 15:02     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-12-03 11:51       ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-01 14:01   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01 16:19     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-03 11:57       ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-01 19:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 11:41   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-03 12:47   ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5e77e912-893b-0c8f-a9a6-b43eaee24ed3@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).