[PATCH][V2] PCI: Fix a potential uninitentional integer overflow issue

[PATCH][V2] PCI: Fix a potential uninitentional integer overflow issue

[Colin King]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The shift of 1 by align_order is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic
and the result is assigned to a resource_size_t type variable that
is a 64 bit unsigned integer on 64 bit platforms. Fix an overflow
before widening issue by making the 1 a ULL.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: 07d8d7e57c28 ("PCI: Make specifying PCI devices in kernel parameters reusable")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---

V2: Use ULL instead of BIT_ULL(), fix spelling mistake and capitalize first
    word of patch subject.

---
 drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 3ef63a101fa1..248044a7ef8c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -6214,7 +6214,7 @@ static resource_size_t pci_specified_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev,
 			if (align_order == -1)
 				align = PAGE_SIZE;
 			else
-				align = 1 << align_order;
+				align = 1ULL << align_order;
 			break;
 		} else if (ret < 0) {
 			pr_err("PCI: Can't parse resource_alignment parameter: %s\n",
-- 
2.28.0

Re: [PATCH][V2] PCI: Fix a potential uninitentional integer overflow issue

[Logan Gunthorpe]

On 2020-11-10 3:10 p.m., Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> The shift of 1 by align_order is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic
> and the result is assigned to a resource_size_t type variable that
> is a 64 bit unsigned integer on 64 bit platforms. Fix an overflow
> before widening issue by making the 1 a ULL.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> Fixes: 07d8d7e57c28 ("PCI: Make specifying PCI devices in kernel parameters reusable")

I think this should probably be

Fixes: 32a9a682bef2 ("PCI: allow assignment of memory resources with a
specified alignment")

That is the commit where the original bug was introduced. 644a544fd9bcd
then extends the code a little bit and 07d8d7e57c28 only refactors it
into a reusable function. If we want this in older stable kernels then
we will probably need to make different patches for the other two vintages.

> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Besides that, the change makes sense to me.

Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>

Thanks,

Logan

Re: [PATCH][V2] PCI: Fix a potential uninitentional integer overflow issue

[Bjorn Helgaas]

[+cc Dan]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:10:48PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> The shift of 1 by align_order is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic
> and the result is assigned to a resource_size_t type variable that
> is a 64 bit unsigned integer on 64 bit platforms. Fix an overflow
> before widening issue by making the 1 a ULL.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> Fixes: 07d8d7e57c28 ("PCI: Make specifying PCI devices in kernel parameters reusable")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Applied to pci/misc for v5.11 with Logan's Reviewed-by and also the
Fixes: correction.

I first applied the patch below to bounds-check the alignment as noted
by Dan.

> ---
> 
> V2: Use ULL instead of BIT_ULL(), fix spelling mistake and capitalize first
>     word of patch subject.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 3ef63a101fa1..248044a7ef8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -6214,7 +6214,7 @@ static resource_size_t pci_specified_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  			if (align_order == -1)
>  				align = PAGE_SIZE;
>  			else
> -				align = 1 << align_order;
> +				align = 1ULL << align_order;
>  			break;
>  		} else if (ret < 0) {
>  			pr_err("PCI: Can't parse resource_alignment parameter: %s\n",

commit d6ca242c448f ("PCI: Bounds-check command-line resource alignment requests")
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date:   Thu Nov 5 14:51:36 2020 -0600

    PCI: Bounds-check command-line resource alignment requests
    
    32-bit BARs are limited to 2GB size (2^31).  By extension, I assume 64-bit
    BARs are limited to 2^63 bytes.  Limit the alignment requested by the
    "pci=resource_alignment=" command-line parameter to 2^63.
    
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007123045.GS4282@kadam
    Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
    Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 8b9bea8ba751..26c1b2d0bacd 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -6197,19 +6197,21 @@ static resource_size_t pci_specified_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev,
 	while (*p) {
 		count = 0;
 		if (sscanf(p, "%d%n", &align_order, &count) == 1 &&
-							p[count] == '@') {
+		    p[count] == '@') {
 			p += count + 1;
+			if (align_order > 63) {
+				pr_err("PCI: Invalid requested alignment (order %d)\n",
+				       align_order);
+				align_order = PAGE_SHIFT;
+			}
 		} else {
-			align_order = -1;
+			align_order = PAGE_SHIFT;
 		}
 
 		ret = pci_dev_str_match(dev, p, &p);
 		if (ret == 1) {
 			*resize = true;
-			if (align_order == -1)
-				align = PAGE_SIZE;
-			else
-				align = 1 << align_order;
+			align = 1 << align_order;
 			break;
 		} else if (ret < 0) {
 			pr_err("PCI: Can't parse resource_alignment parameter: %s\n",

Re: [PATCH][V2] PCI: Fix a potential uninitentional integer overflow issue

[Colin Ian King]

On 14/11/2020 21:53, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Dan]
> 
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:10:48PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> The shift of 1 by align_order is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic
>> and the result is assigned to a resource_size_t type variable that
>> is a 64 bit unsigned integer on 64 bit platforms. Fix an overflow
>> before widening issue by making the 1 a ULL.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
>> Fixes: 07d8d7e57c28 ("PCI: Make specifying PCI devices in kernel parameters reusable")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Applied to pci/misc for v5.11 with Logan's Reviewed-by and also the
> Fixes: correction.
> 
> I first applied the patch below to bounds-check the alignment as noted
> by Dan.
> 
>> ---
>>
>> V2: Use ULL instead of BIT_ULL(), fix spelling mistake and capitalize first
>>     word of patch subject.
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index 3ef63a101fa1..248044a7ef8c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -6214,7 +6214,7 @@ static resource_size_t pci_specified_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev,
>>  			if (align_order == -1)
>>  				align = PAGE_SIZE;
>>  			else
>> -				align = 1 << align_order;
>> +				align = 1ULL << align_order;
>>  			break;
>>  		} else if (ret < 0) {
>>  			pr_err("PCI: Can't parse resource_alignment parameter: %s\n",
> 
> commit d6ca242c448f ("PCI: Bounds-check command-line resource alignment requests")
> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Date:   Thu Nov 5 14:51:36 2020 -0600
> 
>     PCI: Bounds-check command-line resource alignment requests
>     
>     32-bit BARs are limited to 2GB size (2^31).  By extension, I assume 64-bit
>     BARs are limited to 2^63 bytes.  Limit the alignment requested by the
>     "pci=resource_alignment=" command-line parameter to 2^63.
>     
>     Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007123045.GS4282@kadam
>     Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 8b9bea8ba751..26c1b2d0bacd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -6197,19 +6197,21 @@ static resource_size_t pci_specified_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  	while (*p) {
>  		count = 0;
>  		if (sscanf(p, "%d%n", &align_order, &count) == 1 &&
> -							p[count] == '@') {
> +		    p[count] == '@') {
>  			p += count + 1;
> +			if (align_order > 63) {
> +				pr_err("PCI: Invalid requested alignment (order %d)\n",
> +				       align_order);
> +				align_order = PAGE_SHIFT;
> +			}
>  		} else {
> -			align_order = -1;
> +			align_order = PAGE_SHIFT;
>  		}
>  
>  		ret = pci_dev_str_match(dev, p, &p);
>  		if (ret == 1) {
>  			*resize = true;
> -			if (align_order == -1)
> -				align = PAGE_SIZE;
> -			else
> -				align = 1 << align_order;
> +			align = 1 << align_order;
>  			break;
>  		} else if (ret < 0) {
>  			pr_err("PCI: Can't parse resource_alignment parameter: %s\n",
> 

Thanks.