Re: [PATCH 0/9] Serial slave device bus

["H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>]

Hi Marcel,

> Am 10.01.2017 um 13:02 schrieb Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>:
> 
> Hi Nikolaus,
> 
>>> Here goes another attempt at a serial device bus (aka uart slaves, tty
>>> slaves, etc.).
>>> 
>>> After some discussions with Dmitry at LPC, I decided to move away from
>>> extending serio and moved back to making a new bus type instead. He didn't
>>> think using serio was a good fit, and serio has a number of peculiarities
>>> in regards to sysfs and it's driver model. I don't think we want to inherit
>>> those for serial slave devices.
>>> 
>>> This version sits on top of tty_port rather than uart_port as Alan
>>> requested. Once I created a struct tty rather than moving everything
>>> needed to tty_port, it became a lot easier and less invasive to the tty
>>> core code.
>>> 
>>> I have hacked up versions of the BT ldisc and TI ST drivers moved over to
>>> use the serdev bus. I have BT working on the HiKey board which has TI BT.
>>> With the serdev bus support, it eliminates the need for the TI userspace
>>> UIM daemon.
>>> 
>>> This series and the mentioned drivers can be found here[1].
>>> 
>>> Rob
>>> 
>>> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git serial-bus-v2
>>> 
>>> Alan Cox (1):
>>> tty_port: allow a port to be opened with a tty that has no file handle
>>> 
>>> Rob Herring (8):
>>> tty: move the non-file related parts of tty_release to new
>>>  tty_release_struct
>>> tty_port: make tty_port_register_device wrap
>>>  tty_port_register_device_attr
>>> tty: constify tty_ldisc_receive_buf buffer pointer
>>> tty_port: Add port client functions
>>> dt/bindings: Add a serial/UART attached device binding
>>> serdev: Introduce new bus for serial attached devices
>>> serdev: add a tty port controller driver
>>> tty_port: register tty ports with serdev bus
>>> 
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/serial/slave-device.txt    |  34 ++
>>> MAINTAINERS                                        |   8 +
>>> drivers/char/Kconfig                               |   1 +
>>> drivers/tty/Makefile                               |   1 +
>>> drivers/tty/serdev/Kconfig                         |  16 +
>>> drivers/tty/serdev/Makefile                        |   5 +
>>> drivers/tty/serdev/core.c                          | 388 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c                | 244 +++++++++++++
>>> drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c                           |  19 +-
>>> drivers/tty/tty_io.c                               |  44 ++-
>>> drivers/tty/tty_port.c                             |  60 +++-
>>> include/linux/serdev.h                             | 227 ++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/tty.h                                |  12 +-
>>> 13 files changed, 1017 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/slave-device.txt
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/tty/serdev/Kconfig
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/tty/serdev/Makefile
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/serdev.h
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 2.10.1
>>> 
>> 
>> First of all many thanks for making another proposal!
>> 
>> Instead of looking into the implementation details of your code I have
>> hacked my w2sg0004 GPS driver (which works based on my proposed uart_slave
>> driver) so that it makes use of your new serdev API.
>> 
>> Here are some observations which I hope they give directions where your
>> work can be improved:
>> 
>> 1. it was quite easy to convert the driver to a serdev_device_driver :)
>> 
>> The general driver structure could be taken unchanged and it was mainly
>> platform_device -> serdev_device_driver and replacing my notification
>> handlers by serdev_device_ops.
>> 
>> Communication with the chip seems to work well. At least if it is unexpectedly
>> turned on the driver receives the wrong NMEA records and turns the GPS
>> chip off. That is the core of our power management scheme and why
>> we need a serdev driver for this chip at all.
>> 
>> So the general API for getting read/write access to the serial interface
>> (and setting baud rate) from a device driver seems to be fine!
>> 
>> 
>> 2. When I try to open the tty from user space to fetch the serial data I
>> just get
>> 
>> root@letux:~# cat /dev/ttyO1
>> [  659.290618] ttyO ttyO1: tty_open: tty->count(2) != #fd's(1)
>> [  665.257232] ttyO ttyO1: tty_release: tty->count(2) != #fd's(1)
>> ^C
>> root@letux:~#
>> 
>> So it does not seem to be possible to read the data from the tty any more.
>> 
>> Maybe there can be some function serdev_device_set_shared(dev, flag).
>> If set to exclusive the /dev node would be hidden from user-space.
> 
> I would welcome hiding the /dev node completely as an option. That is especially useful for systems where an upstream driver exists and hooks it up directly into the Bluetooth subsystem already.

Yes, that is why I would like to see it hidden/exposed as an option.

I don't really care if it is done by some DT property or such a function.

> 
>> 3. for completely implementing my w2sg0004 driver (and two others) it would
>> be nice to have additional serdev_device_ops:
>> 
>> a) to be notified about user-space clients doing open/close on the tty
>> b) and/or to be notified about user-space tcsetattr or TIOCMSET (for DTR)
>> 
>> There may be other means (ldisc?) to get these notifications, but that
>> needs the serdev driver to register with two different subsystems.
>> 
>> Another approach could be to completely rewrite the driver so that it wraps
>> and hides the /dev/ttyO1 and registers its own /dev/gps tty port for user-space
>> communication. Then it would be notified for all user-space and serial
>> interface activities as a man-in-the-middle.
>> 
>> But I expect that it delays the communication and is quite some overhead.
> 
> My important thing to fix with GPS devices is that we can enumerate them from userspace daemons correctly. So it either becomes its own GPS subsystem or we need sysfs attributes like DEVTYPE clearly identifying them as GPS devices (similar to what we did with network interfaces).
> 
> So the question is really if a driver only needs to do power management on open() and close() or if it also has to translate or transform the packets. There are devices who speak NMEA and all is good.

The device I want to upstream the driver speaks NMEA but should be powered down unless accessed...

> And there are others that get plain raw data and need extra work in a daemon to translate it into NMEA or some form of position information.

Indeed and that should also be possible.
In that case you likely must follow the man-in-the-middle approach,
quite similar to how Rob has updated the ti-st driver. I have seen code
where it creates some /dev/hci (if I remember correctly).

BR,
Nikolaus