linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
To: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Cc: brendanhiggins@google.com, frowand.list@gmail.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 kunit-next 3/4] kunit: subtests should be indented 4 spaces according to TAP
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:11:08 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b41e9fe-aa9e-698b-d356-0227e6f2021c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003252202360.25268@localhost>

On 3/25/20 4:03 PM, Alan Maguire wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, shuah wrote:
> 
>> On 3/13/20 8:44 AM, Alan Maguire wrote:
>>> Introduce KUNIT_INDENT macro which corresponds to 4-space indentation,
>>> and use it to modify indentation from tab to 4 spaces.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>>> ---
>>>    include/kunit/test.h                |  7 +++-
>>>    lib/kunit/assert.c                  | 79
>>>    +++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>    lib/kunit/test.c                    |  6 +--
>>>    tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 10 ++---
>>>    4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
>>> index f7b2ed4c..d49cdb4 100644
>>> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
>>> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
>>> @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ struct kunit_resource {
>>>    /* Size of log associated with test. */
>>>    #define KUNIT_LOG_SIZE	512
>>>    
>>> +/* TAP specifies subtest indentation of 4 spaces. */
>>> +#define KUNIT_INDENT	"    "
>>> +#define KUNIT_INDENT2	KUNIT_INDENT KUNIT_INDENT
>>
>> Sorry for a late comment on this.
>>
>> What's the reason to do it this way? Why wouldn't you define
>> it as 8 spaces long string?
>>
> 
> I could have I suppose; I thought it makes it a bit easier
> to read as above (though it did generate a checkpatch
> warning; I thought readability was more important in this
> case, but I can alter if needed).
>   
Please do. Couple of things. KUNIT_INDENT2 doesn't really
tell me much. Same with KUNIT_INDENT

Please make the names more descriptive. Something along the
lines of

KUNIT_INDENT_4SPACE
KUNIT_INDENT_8SPACE

>> Also can you please make sure to run checkpatch --strict on the
>> patches you send?
>>
> 
> Sure! There were also some other line-too-long warnings
> generated as a result of this patch, but when I fixed those
> checkpatch complained about splitting strings across multiple
> lines.  The only way out was to reduce the amount of information
> in the log messages, which I didn't want to do.  In future I can
> note checkpatch warnings that I couldn't find a way to fix in the
> commit message if that would help?
> 

I understand. This is an error though. I am willing to ignore line-too
long warnings for the most part. I don't like to see errors in general.

thanks,
-- Shuah




  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-25 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-13 14:44 [PATCH v7 kunit-next 0/4] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results Alan Maguire
2020-03-13 14:44 ` [PATCH v7 kunit-next 1/4] kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display Alan Maguire
2020-03-13 14:44 ` [PATCH v7 kunit-next 2/4] kunit: add log test Alan Maguire
2020-03-13 14:44 ` [PATCH v7 kunit-next 3/4] kunit: subtests should be indented 4 spaces according to TAP Alan Maguire
2020-03-14  0:00   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-03-25 20:05   ` shuah
2020-03-25 22:03     ` Alan Maguire
2020-03-25 22:11       ` shuah [this message]
2020-03-13 14:44 ` [PATCH v7 kunit-next 4/4] kunit: update documentation to describe debugfs representation Alan Maguire
2020-03-14  0:03 ` [PATCH v7 kunit-next 0/4] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6b41e9fe-aa9e-698b-d356-0227e6f2021c@kernel.org \
    --to=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).