benchmarks

benchmarks

[Jan Koss]

Hello.

Recently, I choosed between FreeBSD and Linux for server,
I found out only such bechmarks:

http://geri.cc.fer.hr/~ivoras/web2/papers/osbench.html

1)may be some one know any other benchmarks?
2)something changed since 2.6.5?

Re: benchmarks

[Michal Piotrowski]

Hi,

On 08/02/06, Jan Koss <kossjan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Recently, I choosed between FreeBSD and Linux for server,
> I found out only such bechmarks:
>
> http://geri.cc.fer.hr/~ivoras/web2/papers/osbench.html
>
> 1)may be some one know any other benchmarks?

http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ - It's _very_ (_very_! :) old benchmark.

Regards,
Michal Piotrowski

Re: Benchmarks

[Randy.Dunlap]

| Hello everyone,
| If someone make some modifications to kernel code and want to know how much
| overead those modifications has caused, what are the benchmarks that one
| should use to calculate the overhead of the added code.
| please cc the reply to me.
| Thanks a lot.

There are a lot of benchmarks out there.
E.g., some are listed at
  http://lbs.sourceforge.net/
and
  http://lse.sourceforge.net/benchmarks/

just depends on what you want/need, like others have said.
-- 
~Randy

Re: Benchmarks

[Jesper Juhl]

On 1/3/06, Avishay Traeger <atraeger@cs.sunysb.edu> wrote:
> Well that would very much depend on what you're changing.  For example,
> if it is a file system modification, then use file system benchmarks.
> However, those same benchmarks would not be appropriate for changes in
> the network stack.  A pre-written benchmark may not even exist.  You
> should use your knowledge of what you are changing to choose an
> appropriate benchmark that will stress that part of the kernel.
>
Or, as is often the case, write a benchmark app yourself to test the
specific thing you've changed.

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

Re: Benchmarks

[Avishay Traeger]

Well that would very much depend on what you're changing.  For example,
if it is a file system modification, then use file system benchmarks.
However, those same benchmarks would not be appropriate for changes in
the network stack.  A pre-written benchmark may not even exist.  You
should use your knowledge of what you are changing to choose an
appropriate benchmark that will stress that part of the kernel.

Avishay Traeger
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/~avishay/

On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 16:34 -0500, Sharma Sushant wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> If someone make some modifications to kernel code and want to know how much
> overead those modifications has caused, what are the benchmarks that one
> should use to calculate the overhead of the added code. 
> please cc the reply to me.
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> --
> Sushant Sharma
> http://cs.unm.edu/~sushant
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Benchmarks

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 16:34 -0500, Sharma Sushant wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> If someone make some modifications to kernel code and want to know how much
> overead those modifications has caused, what are the benchmarks that one
> should use to calculate the overhead of the added code. 
> please cc the reply to me.

it really depends on what area of the kernel you're changing.. there's
no "golden" benchmark that tests the entire kernel and gives one nice
answer... there are however a lot of smaller benchmarks that test a
portion of the kernel....

Benchmarks

[Sharma Sushant]

Hello everyone,
If someone make some modifications to kernel code and want to know how much
overead those modifications has caused, what are the benchmarks that one
should use to calculate the overhead of the added code. 
please cc the reply to me.
Thanks a lot.

--
Sushant Sharma
http://cs.unm.edu/~sushant